by Brodlach » Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:32 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Armchair expert » Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:50 pm
by Eagles2014 » Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:54 pm
Brodlach wrote:Taryn Thomas in strife again after he posted a video of himself driving erratically with the caption “living my best life “
by Spargo » Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:54 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
by Armchair expert » Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:57 pm
Spargo wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
For pushing some Bulldog midget on the shoulder?
by Armchair expert » Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:03 pm
by gadj1976 » Tue Apr 11, 2023 10:05 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
RESIGN IMMEDIATELY MICHAEL CHRISTIAN
by Vamos » Tue Apr 11, 2023 11:39 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
RESIGN IMMEDIATELY MICHAEL CHRISTIAN
I think the AFL have created a monster. A player gets hit in the head = must be reportable. The club takes the matter to tribunal because the act itself isn't dangerous and gets off.
What's the AFL's actual stance on the head being sacrosanct? If it's that a player gets hit in the head, it's reportable, then fix the rules so that the tribunal has no option but to suspend the player. Till then, we'll have this grey area.
by whufc » Wed Apr 12, 2023 7:46 am
gadj1976 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
RESIGN IMMEDIATELY MICHAEL CHRISTIAN
I think the AFL have created a monster. A player gets hit in the head = must be reportable. The club takes the matter to tribunal because the act itself isn't dangerous and gets off.
What's the AFL's actual stance on the head being sacrosanct? If it's that a player gets hit in the head, it's reportable, then fix the rules so that the tribunal has no option but to suspend the player. Till then, we'll have this grey area.
by tigerpie » Wed Apr 12, 2023 8:07 am
whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
RESIGN IMMEDIATELY MICHAEL CHRISTIAN
I think the AFL have created a monster. A player gets hit in the head = must be reportable. The club takes the matter to tribunal because the act itself isn't dangerous and gets off.
What's the AFL's actual stance on the head being sacrosanct? If it's that a player gets hit in the head, it's reportable, then fix the rules so that the tribunal has no option but to suspend the player. Till then, we'll have this grey area.
I think the issue lies in the fact the punishment is far more weighted against the outcome than the action. (i guess that is reflective of the legal system but not sure it works as well in a sports sense)
In the McKay incident, there wasn't a lot of damage done but that action imo was very dangerous and somewhat a non-footballing action. It wasn't a bump (tucked in elbow) , wasn't a tackle it was a raised arm/elbow.
by gadj1976 » Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:14 am
tigerpie wrote:whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Tom Lynch gets off also
RESIGN IMMEDIATELY MICHAEL CHRISTIAN
I think the AFL have created a monster. A player gets hit in the head = must be reportable. The club takes the matter to tribunal because the act itself isn't dangerous and gets off.
What's the AFL's actual stance on the head being sacrosanct? If it's that a player gets hit in the head, it's reportable, then fix the rules so that the tribunal has no option but to suspend the player. Till then, we'll have this grey area.
I think the issue lies in the fact the punishment is far more weighted against the outcome than the action. (i guess that is reflective of the legal system but not sure it works as well in a sports sense)
In the McKay incident, there wasn't a lot of damage done but that action imo was very dangerous and somewhat a non-footballing action. It wasn't a bump (tucked in elbow) , wasn't a tackle it was a raised arm/elbow.
Why didn't he just spoil the ball off the boot? He had the time. But his eyes were on cheezels and intention was to take the body.
by Booney » Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:24 am
Armchair expert wrote:Crows GR guernsey
Looks awesome imo
by Spargo » Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:49 am
Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Crows GR guernsey
Looks awesome imo
Good merch, not sure I like it as a guernsey. My OCD doesn't allow anything that's not symmetrical to please my eye.
by Booney » Wed Apr 12, 2023 9:51 am
Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Crows GR guernsey
Looks awesome imo
Good merch, not sure I like it as a guernsey. My OCD doesn't allow anything that's not symmetrical to please my eye.
A little strange to wear predominantly navy blue when playing Carlton?
by Zelezny Chucks » Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:26 am
by Armchair expert » Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:27 am
Zelezny Chucks wrote:Baffling that McKay gets off for a late hit elbows to the head, yet if he chose to bump and gets him high then he gets a week or two
by Armchair expert » Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:28 am
Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Crows GR guernsey
Looks awesome imo
Good merch, not sure I like it as a guernsey. My OCD doesn't allow anything that's not symmetrical to please my eye.
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:29 am
Carlton will be in white as the away teamSpargo wrote:Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Crows GR guernsey
Looks awesome imo
Good merch, not sure I like it as a guernsey. My OCD doesn't allow anything that's not symmetrical to please my eye.
A little strange to wear predominantly navy blue when playing Carlton?
by Booney » Wed Apr 12, 2023 10:40 am
Armchair expert wrote:Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Crows GR guernsey
Looks awesome imo
Good merch, not sure I like it as a guernsey. My OCD doesn't allow anything that's not symmetrical to please my eye.
I changed my mind after seeing the other side, truly horrific.
by RB » Wed Apr 12, 2023 12:32 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |