RB wrote:Vamos wrote:RB wrote:In terms of knockout finals in that time, North have won two to Port's nil. That's what I find unfathomable in terms of Kenny being extended.Dutchy wrote:In the last 8 years Port and North have won the same amount of finals.
Why only 8 years, I mean aren't you talking about Ken's tenure after all?
Kenny's numbers are slightly less mediocre if you include his whole tenure, yes. I used the 8-year period referred to by Dutchy. (Ken's been there so long it does get a bit confusing!!)
Just strikes me as weird that a bloke with Kenny's record in big matches, particularly in recent years, would get extended for a 12th and 13th season.
Wouldn't be contentious to suggest that Ken can't really take Port further, and that after 11 seasons the message has perhaps gone a tad stale and it's time to for change.
He's got 2 years because you can't give him one.
They couldn't not re-sign him cause they're going so well this year.
The strain will come if they go out in straight sets this year then start poorly next year
If that happens he'll be gone in June.