by Brodlach » Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:07 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by am Bays » Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:44 am
wenchbarwer wrote:Spargo wrote:am Bays wrote:I’m pretty happy with McGree, his ability to play the Fourth midfielder role has helped us.
He’s the second coming of Trevor Cranston.
He must have got fit since his South Adelaide/Reynella days, was the prototype lumbering, old school ruck then.
by Hazydog » Wed Mar 06, 2024 5:21 pm
am Bays wrote:I’m pretty happy with McGree, his ability to play the Fourth midfielder role has helped us.
Boyd arguably the best in the comp though
by southernbulldog » Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:01 pm
by Hazydog » Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:28 pm
by northerner » Thu Mar 07, 2024 2:50 pm
Hazydog wrote:From The Advertiser..
“ SANFL clubs have expressed concern over the AFL’s game-changing new concussion policy, questioning its fairness in the local league.
While SA’s state league clubs fully understand the need to protect the head and players’ futures, they have questioned the disparity between the AFL’s new 21-day concussion protocol rule for players from the eight stand-alone clubs and 12-day protocol for AFL-listed players from Adelaide and Port Adelaide.
This could prove finals-shaping and premiership-deciding.”
by wenchbarwer » Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:12 pm
northerner wrote:Hazydog wrote:From The Advertiser..
“ SANFL clubs have expressed concern over the AFL’s game-changing new concussion policy, questioning its fairness in the local league.
While SA’s state league clubs fully understand the need to protect the head and players’ futures, they have questioned the disparity between the AFL’s new 21-day concussion protocol rule for players from the eight stand-alone clubs and 12-day protocol for AFL-listed players from Adelaide and Port Adelaide.
This could prove finals-shaping and premiership-deciding.”
Which translates to Port and Crow players EVEN THOSE WHO ARE TOP UPS, miss just one game whilst SANFL players potentially miss three.
by am Bays » Thu Mar 07, 2024 3:22 pm
by Mic » Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:14 pm
Hazydog wrote:From The Advertiser..
“ SANFL clubs have expressed concern over the AFL’s game-changing new concussion policy, questioning its fairness in the local league.
While SA’s state league clubs fully understand the need to protect the head and players’ futures, they have questioned the disparity between the AFL’s new 21-day concussion protocol rule for players from the eight stand-alone clubs and 12-day protocol for AFL-listed players from Adelaide and Port Adelaide.
This could prove finals-shaping and premiership-deciding.”
by whybother » Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:40 am
by Booney » Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:36 am
Hazydog wrote:From The Advertiser..
“ SANFL clubs have expressed concern over the AFL’s game-changing new concussion policy, questioning its fairness in the local league.
While SA’s state league clubs fully understand the need to protect the head and players’ futures, they have questioned the disparity between the AFL’s new 21-day concussion protocol rule for players from the eight stand-alone clubs and 12-day protocol for AFL-listed players from Adelaide and Port Adelaide.
This could prove finals-shaping and premiership-deciding.”
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 10, 2024 5:46 am
Booney wrote:Hazydog wrote:From The Advertiser..
“ SANFL clubs have expressed concern over the AFL’s game-changing new concussion policy, questioning its fairness in the local league.
While SA’s state league clubs fully understand the need to protect the head and players’ futures, they have questioned the disparity between the AFL’s new 21-day concussion protocol rule for players from the eight stand-alone clubs and 12-day protocol for AFL-listed players from Adelaide and Port Adelaide.
This could prove finals-shaping and premiership-deciding.”
sAnFL.
by knowledge » Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:54 pm
Mic wrote:Hazydog wrote:From The Advertiser..
“ SANFL clubs have expressed concern over the AFL’s game-changing new concussion policy, questioning its fairness in the local league.
While SA’s state league clubs fully understand the need to protect the head and players’ futures, they have questioned the disparity between the AFL’s new 21-day concussion protocol rule for players from the eight stand-alone clubs and 12-day protocol for AFL-listed players from Adelaide and Port Adelaide.
This could prove finals-shaping and premiership-deciding.”
Why are the rules different? Do AFL players' heads recover quicker than all other footballers in the country?
by knowledge » Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:01 pm
am Bays wrote:Another classic example of the AFL boffins having NFI when it comes to the structure and systems of off field support provided at SANFL clubs and i dare say the WAFL clubs too
by DOC » Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:25 pm
by Panther Pack » Mon Mar 18, 2024 1:18 pm
by southee » Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:01 pm
Panther Pack wrote:Early days but South are a good chance for the spoon this year. We can't score been a problem for a couple of years and might be worse this year.
by dedja » Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:06 pm
Panther Pack wrote:Early days but South are a good chance for the spoon this year. We can't score been a problem for a couple of years and might be worse this year.
by Big Phil » Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:56 pm
dedja wrote:Panther Pack wrote:Early days but South are a good chance for the spoon this year. We can't score been a problem for a couple of years and might be worse this year.
Bring back Studley?
by Panther Pack » Mon Mar 18, 2024 7:59 pm
dedja wrote:Panther Pack wrote:Early days but South are a good chance for the spoon this year. We can't score been a problem for a couple of years and might be worse this year.
Bring back Studley?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |