by Dog_ger » Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:16 am
by Dog_ger » Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:23 am
by Sojourner » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:15 am
by mypaddock » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:34 am
by TroyGFC » Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:08 pm
Dog_ger wrote:Maybe it's the time,
for the General to throw open the employee lease offer to the General Public...?
I'd have a top of the range Calais for around $100 a week....![]()
by gadj1976 » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:20 pm
by Pidge » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:27 pm
by Psyber » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:27 pm
by mypaddock » Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:29 am
Psyber wrote:I suspect that the present "green" cars - hybrids - will turn out to be an expensive dead end.
I expect he cost of tooling up to produce these vehicles is prohibitive, and so is the cost, in cash terms and environmental terms, of producing the batteries.
I haven't seen costs on replacement batteries yet, but it should start to show up as the pioneer buyers cars start to age.
So, one has to question the point of GM or anyone else gearing up to produce them, since, ultimately, either efficient fuel cells will be developed and take over, or we'll be burning hydrogen or ethanol in engines of the existing type, until we do have the fuel cells.
The federal government could help, now, by using part of the "stimulus package" to reduce the tax take on existing fuels.
Then it could, through tax concessions, assist the funding of converting existing fuel stations and vehicles to alternative fuels from renewable sources.
Ethanol could probably be produced in Australia are comparable cost to existing fuels at current prices, and if we used, say, Thorium fission to provide adequate power for desalination plants we could extract hydrogen from sea water at the same time.
by Psyber » Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:44 am
Agreed...mypaddock wrote: The current "green" cars might be a dead end but if GM is to have a future they can no longer keep producing 6 & 8 cylinder petrol powered vehicles as their main source of revenue.
The future is in more energy efficient vehicles and they need to get on the band wagon soon.
by dinglinga » Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:20 am
Sojourner wrote:GM made a decision to drop the Barina made in Spain and replace it with one made in Korea that has all of a 2 star safety rating which testing reports will cop a fatality at a 40kph hit into a door where someone is seated next to....
People expect that from the bottom end of the market, not from a company that claims to market at the top of the family car market. For Holden to succeed, if they are going to rebadge cars as their own they might want to do what they once did with the Apollo and the Nova and get hold of a decent car to start with, maybe something like a Peugeot or similar.
Why pay full price for rubbish made in Korea when you can go buy the Kia branded version for cheaper which is the same quality at a far less price - albeit crap as well?
by The Ash Man » Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:54 am
Psyber wrote:I suspect that the present "green" cars - hybrids - will turn out to be an expensive dead end.
I expect he cost of tooling up to produce these vehicles is prohibitive, and so is the cost, in cash terms and environmental terms, of producing the batteries.
I haven't seen costs on replacement batteries yet, but it should start to show up as the pioneer buyers cars start to age.
So, one has to question the point of GM or anyone else gearing up to produce them, since, ultimately, either efficient fuel cells will be developed and take over, or we'll be burning hydrogen or ethanol in engines of the existing type, until we do have the fuel cells.
The federal government could help, now, by using part of the "stimulus package" to reduce the tax take on existing fuels.
Then it could, through tax concessions, assist the funding of converting existing fuel stations and vehicles to alternative fuels from renewable sources.
Ethanol could probably be produced in Australia are comparable cost to existing fuels at current prices, and if we used, say, Thorium fission to provide adequate power for desalination plants we could extract hydrogen from sea water at the same time.
by Bully » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:23 am
by smac » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:01 am
Pidge wrote:Do people want to spend $35,000 on a car when they can spend $20,000 on a car which is just as good?
by Sojourner » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:15 am
Bulldog wrote:word is that for GMH to make a 'green' car it would send them bankrupt as the factory out there has no area to build it, would involve mass upgrades of current factorys and install of new ones and being the current finance in the world it will send them bankrupt. Also ford is in the same boat
by Punk Rooster » Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:31 pm
smac wrote:Pidge wrote:Do people want to spend $35,000 on a car when they can spend $20,000 on a car which is just as good?
What car for $20K is as good as a $35k car? Curious about that comment.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 pm
by TroyGFC » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:50 pm
by TroyGFC » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:52 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |