by Rik E Boy » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:15 pm
by whatcha got there? » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:18 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:"I didn't see it coming.", the words of a 15 year employee of Pacific Brands (King Gee, Yakka, Bonds and many others) who has suddenly found herself unemployed becuase the company can pay Chinese workers peanuts to make the same product.
Despite the fact that this company is making money they are 'downsizing' and going off shore. With the financial crisis providing the smokescreen, 1850 workers got the chop. For anyone else who currently is working in manufacturing TRAIN UP NOW. This s***t has been going on for the last two decades, there is no future in manufacturing in this country. I got out in 1996 and you should consider doing the same.
"I didn't see it coming"? You are going to get screwed, that's what's coming so TRAIN UP.
regards,
REB
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
by aceman » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:55 pm
whatcha got there? wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:"I didn't see it coming.", the words of a 15 year employee of Pacific Brands (King Gee, Yakka, Bonds and many others) who has suddenly found herself unemployed becuase the company can pay Chinese workers peanuts to make the same product.
Despite the fact that this company is making money they are 'downsizing' and going off shore. With the financial crisis providing the smokescreen, 1850 workers got the chop. For anyone else who currently is working in manufacturing TRAIN UP NOW. This s***t has been going on for the last two decades, there is no future in manufacturing in this country. I got out in 1996 and you should consider doing the same.
"I didn't see it coming"? You are going to get screwed, that's what's coming so TRAIN UP.
regards,
REB
i thought bonds was purely an australian company? pfft...that changes my ideas on them.
by whatcha got there? » Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:02 pm
aceman wrote:whatcha got there? wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:"I didn't see it coming.", the words of a 15 year employee of Pacific Brands (King Gee, Yakka, Bonds and many others) who has suddenly found herself unemployed becuase the company can pay Chinese workers peanuts to make the same product.
Despite the fact that this company is making money they are 'downsizing' and going off shore. With the financial crisis providing the smokescreen, 1850 workers got the chop. For anyone else who currently is working in manufacturing TRAIN UP NOW. This s***t has been going on for the last two decades, there is no future in manufacturing in this country. I got out in 1996 and you should consider doing the same.
"I didn't see it coming"? You are going to get screwed, that's what's coming so TRAIN UP.
regards,
REB
i thought bonds was purely an australian company? pfft...that changes my ideas on them.
Until 6 months ago I worked with a wanker who would not believe when told that both Yakka & King Gee along with many others were owned by the same company, he would argue till he went blue in the face so in the end I gave up.
Wish I could find the silly pr^ck again, I'd ask him what he thinks now about who owns who?
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
by Psyber » Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:07 pm
by Sojourner » Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:22 pm
by JAS » Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:40 pm
by Dog_ger » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:48 am
by Psyber » Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:29 am
Sojourner wrote:Why doesnt Kevin Rudd nationalise the company and keep the jobs in Australia?
by mick » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:01 am
Psyber wrote:Sojourner wrote:Why doesnt Kevin Rudd nationalise the company and keep the jobs in Australia?
Because nobody would buy the expensive products when they can get Chinese ones cheaper at K-mart or Target etc.
Or do you think the government should run it at a loss?
by mypaddock » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:02 am
by mick » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:08 am
mypaddock wrote:I'm sure if we really wanted to be, this country could be totally self sufficient due to our comparitively small population, but unfortunately most companies are too greedy and are happy to go offshore to increase their profits.
IMO a mindset/culture change is needed from the grassroots level e.g. high school and to flow through to university etc teaching that business shouldnt just be about growth, growth, growth! Of course you need to be making a profit, but what person/ company needs to be making million/billion dollar profits in exchange for ppl losing their jobs. That is the core problem with how businesses are run these days.
by Rik E Boy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:41 am
mick wrote: I think the first poster (REB) said Pacific was making money, they in fact posted a 6 month loss of $150,000,000. Their problem is that Pacific are saddled with debt, debt laden companies and their employees will face a very uncertain future in the foreseeable future as will debt laden households.
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:44 am
by Booney » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:09 am
Rik E Boy wrote:mick wrote: I think the first poster (REB) said Pacific was making money, they in fact posted a 6 month loss of $150,000,000. Their problem is that Pacific are saddled with debt, debt laden companies and their employees will face a very uncertain future in the foreseeable future as will debt laden households.
Cheers Mick. I was not aware of this. And yes Psyber they all need jobs but regardless of which way you intend to go you do actually need to upskill to make yourself employable. In 1996 all I could do was "push a button". Not much point doing that for 13 years or when that shop shuts I'm middle aged and unemployable.
regards,
REB
by Sojourner » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:13 am
Psyber wrote: Because nobody would buy the expensive products when they can get Chinese ones cheaper at K-mart or Target etc. Or do you think the government should run it at a loss?
by Rik E Boy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:11 am
Booney wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:mick wrote: I think the first poster (REB) said Pacific was making money, they in fact posted a 6 month loss of $150,000,000. Their problem is that Pacific are saddled with debt, debt laden companies and their employees will face a very uncertain future in the foreseeable future as will debt laden households.
Cheers Mick. I was not aware of this. And yes Psyber they all need jobs but regardless of which way you intend to go you do actually need to upskill to make yourself employable. In 1996 all I could do was "push a button". Not much point doing that for 13 years or when that shop shuts I'm middle aged and unemployable.
regards,
REB
Now the button is on a mouse not a pneumatically powered press...
by Dog_ger » Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:16 am
by Psyber » Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:16 pm
I found myself tending to agree with Bill Shorten, who was on TV last night suggesting executive salaries should be limited to 10 or 15 times the base rate of the workers. I really don't think these guys are so good that they would all get very highly paid jobs overseas if they couldn't get the money here, or that people like Sol Trujillo are worth the money it costs to import them.mick wrote: ...PS I do not think it is right under the current circumstances that the directors and executives of this company voted themselves payrises. The problem with private enterprise in the recent past and today, failure is almost rewarded equally as success, hopefully this will change.
by JAS » Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:06 pm
Dog_ger wrote:"Breaking News"
Pacific Brands Bosses Lined their pokets with LARGE payouts a year back....
![]()
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |