

[Somebody has to go - Melbourne can't sustain so many teams.]
by Psyber » Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:49 pm
by Andy #24 » Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:52 pm
Psyber wrote:A historic day when the Kangaroos reject the prospect of becoming the Gold Coast Kangaroos in favour of their likely future as the North Melbourne Major Mitchell Hopping Mice in the VFL competition.![]()
![]()
[Somebody has to go - Melbourne can't sustain so many teams.]
by Sojourner » Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:58 pm
Psyber wrote:A historic day when the Kangaroos reject the prospect of becoming the Gold Coast Kangaroos in favour of their likely future as the North Melbourne Major Mitchell Hopping Mice in the VFL competition.![]()
![]()
[Somebody has to go - Melbourne can't sustain so many teams.]
by Aerie » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:08 pm
Sojourner wrote:The AFL should introduce a 17th side then cut all welfare payments to clubs then let market forces decide which club drops out of the AFL. If a side really cant afford to be in the big leauge, dropping back to the VFL at least keeps the club alive rather than all their history being cancelled out.
by am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:13 pm
Andy #24 wrote:Psyber wrote:A historic day when the Kangaroos reject the prospect of becoming the Gold Coast Kangaroos in favour of their likely future as the North Melbourne Major Mitchell Hopping Mice in the VFL competition.![]()
![]()
[Somebody has to go - Melbourne can't sustain so many teams.]
Courageous but correct decision by the board. By moving to the Gold Coast they would have remained the same coporate entity but ceased to be the real Kangaroos. Abandoning Arden street would have been abandoning everything that Nth Melb ever stood for to become a marketing tool of the AFL. At least now their club has a chance to survive.
by am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:16 pm
Aerie wrote:Sojourner wrote:The AFL should introduce a 17th side then cut all welfare payments to clubs then let market forces decide which club drops out of the AFL. If a side really cant afford to be in the big leauge, dropping back to the VFL at least keeps the club alive rather than all their history being cancelled out.
Or maybe the clubs should rally together and f*** the AFL (read current administration) off and form a new competition and see whether people follow football clubs or AFL.
by MW » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:53 pm
by Andy #24 » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:14 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:[
but in 10 years time North Melbourne will go the way of the Dodo and University unless it merges with the new Gold Coast team or relocates on its own at the end of next year or 2009 when the survival plan fails to keep up with the increasing costs of running an AFL franchise (*winks* in Dutchy's direction).
by Dutchy » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:18 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:As i said with 8 games guaranteed a week watch the AFL step back and reduce the competitive balance fund to the Melbourne base clubs as it lets survival of the fittest determine who will survive.
by am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:27 pm
by Psyber » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:29 pm
Andy #24 wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:...but in 10 years time North Melbourne will go the way of the Dodo and University unless it merges with the new Gold Coast team or relocates on its own at the end of next year or 2009 when the survival plan fails to keep up with the increasing costs of running an AFL franchise (*winks* in Dutchy's direction).
At what point does it cease to be Nth Melb. Clubs raison d'etre are the members and people that support them. You can move the players and give them new clubrooms, but you can't pick up the supportes and people who made the club what it is and plonk them on the Gold Coast.
It's just the AFL trading the soul of the game for $ once again.
by Hondo » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:38 pm
by am Bays » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:44 pm
Dutchy wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:As i said with 8 games guaranteed a week watch the AFL step back and reduce the competitive balance fund to the Melbourne base clubs as it lets survival of the fittest determine who will survive.
Does anyone here actually understand the CBF?alright get rid of it BUT let us play Collingwood, Essendon, Richmond & Carlton all twice a year like they all get the advantage of doing EVERY year - then flows through to gate receipts, the CBF gives us a monetary rewards for not having these advantages of the draw....
by Aerie » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:51 pm
by Hondo » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:53 pm
by Psyber » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:55 pm
Aerie wrote:Good posts hondo and psyber. Agree with you both. My brain says stiff bickies to the Melbourne clubs and yes, there needs to be less of them for the benefit of a national competition. Look what the SANFL had to go through. My heart says what the NMFC are going through is unfair and I hope they can fight and stay alive and prosper in a national competition and show the true values of a club can still hold sway in the corporate sporting world.
I hope the Kangaroos win this fight.
by Aerie » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:20 pm
Psyber wrote:Aerie wrote:Good posts hondo and psyber. Agree with you both. My brain says stiff bickies to the Melbourne clubs and yes, there needs to be less of them for the benefit of a national competition. Look what the SANFL had to go through. My heart says what the NMFC are going through is unfair and I hope they can fight and stay alive and prosper in a national competition and show the true values of a club can still hold sway in the corporate sporting world.
I hope the Kangaroos win this fight.
Fair enough, but who goes instead? I really don't think there are enough good players nationally to sustain the standard with 16 teams let alone more. Already some teams are demonstrably undermanned.
by Andy #24 » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:23 pm
hondo71 wrote:I hope James Brayshaw isn't letting the emotion get in the way of sensible decision making. Or in the way of personal ambition to become the next Eddie Maguire now that he looks like being in charge after all this is over.
He has actually left the door open (cleverly to give him credit) in terms of positioning the Board so that if a Gold Coast Stadium deal is worked out we may not have heard the last of it. I think what we may have is a delaying tactic especially when you consider they always wanted another year to think about it anyway. 2010 is still 2 years away after all.
AD seems to be a overly-comfortable with the decision (compared to his comments 3 weeks ago) so I wonder if Brayshaw has managed to keep both sides happy for the time being.
You heard it here first
by Dutchy » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:41 pm
by Rushby Hinds » Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:40 am
Andy #24 wrote:Psyber wrote:A historic day when the Kangaroos reject the prospect of becoming the Gold Coast Kangaroos in favour of their likely future as the North Melbourne Major Mitchell Hopping Mice in the VFL competition.![]()
![]()
[Somebody has to go - Melbourne can't sustain so many teams.]
Courageous but correct decision by the board. By moving to the Gold Coast they would have remained the same coporate entity but ceased to be the real Kangaroos. Abandoning Arden street would have been abandoning everything that Nth Melb ever stood for to become a marketing tool of the AFL. At least now their club has a chance to survive.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |