Useless wrote:FroffiesMcVeigh wrote:Useless wrote:footys the winner wrote:Who is gone useless?
didn't the old mate that got weeks get the sack?
Where'd you hear that?
on this forum.
Forgot this a great source for the truth.
by FroffiesMcVeigh » Thu May 15, 2014 1:31 pm
Useless wrote:FroffiesMcVeigh wrote:Useless wrote:footys the winner wrote:Who is gone useless?
didn't the old mate that got weeks get the sack?
Where'd you hear that?
on this forum.
by Lame Choice » Thu May 15, 2014 2:38 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:
I think it is a great rule and should be there to stay. What does it matter if the association doesn't field its strongest side. To me the whole point of association footy is to give the youngsters (under 28) exposure to a higher level of footy. Nobody remembers 2 weeks after the event who won or what the scores were.
From the Tigers I would be surprised if anyone other than Pym, Hood, Beard (U21) and maybe Shimmin made the squad.
by RooShootOhh » Thu May 15, 2014 3:40 pm
by Lame Choice » Thu May 15, 2014 4:00 pm
RooShootOhh wrote:Possible team line up with rules (And Form) as they are:
FF - Dawson Nikolus Feeley
HF - Allmond Hardiman Howell
C - Pym Stribling Robertson
HB - Earl O'Brien Birchmore
FB - Pearson Mark Clements
RK - Dowdell Montgomery Seccafien
INT - Hood Greenshields Michael T.Leighton
Obviously the squad might be bigger, but good representation by most clubs.
Tried to avoid just loading up on good midfielders playing out of position
Thoughts???
by Swamp Donkey » Thu May 15, 2014 4:13 pm
Lame Choice wrote:RooShootOhh wrote:Possible team line up with rules (And Form) as they are:
FF - Dawson Nikolus Feeley
HF - Allmond Hardiman Howell
C - Pym Stribling Robertson
HB - Earl O'Brien Birchmore
FB - Pearson Mark Clements
RK - Dowdell Montgomery Seccafien
INT - Hood Greenshields Michael T.Leighton
Obviously the squad might be bigger, but good representation by most clubs.
Tried to avoid just loading up on good midfielders playing out of position
Thoughts???
I doubt Big Nik will play. Solly in.
by Nocyrils » Thu May 15, 2014 7:32 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:Lame Choice wrote:RooShootOhh wrote:Possible team line up with rules (And Form) as they are:
FF - Dawson Nikolus Feeley
HF - Allmond Hardiman Howell
C - Pym Stribling Robertson
HB - Earl O'Brien Birchmore
FB - Pearson Mark Clements
RK - Dowdell Montgomery Seccafien
INT - Hood Greenshields Michael T.Leighton
Obviously the squad might be bigger, but good representation by most clubs.
Tried to avoid just loading up on good midfielders playing out of position
Thoughts???
I doubt Big Nik will play. Solly in.
Ash Duncan in
by Ace of Spades » Thu May 15, 2014 10:26 pm
by hotspur » Thu May 15, 2014 10:30 pm
by RooShootOhh » Thu May 15, 2014 11:20 pm
by footys the winner » Fri May 16, 2014 7:50 am
hotspur wrote:Explains why they have so much cash to splash on players. Don't all the A grade get some sort of payment?
$200 a registered player will buy a few $1000 a game participants.
by Ace of Spades » Fri May 16, 2014 8:30 am
RooShootOhh wrote:Ace, I got told it includes Club membership which has entry to home games and/or tea vouchers or something like that.
Hotspur, know your lads have never played for nothing, something about a pot and kettle springs to mind!
by OnSong » Fri May 16, 2014 10:10 am
Ace of Spades wrote:RooShootOhh wrote:Ace, I got told it includes Club membership which has entry to home games and/or tea vouchers or something like that.
Hotspur, know your lads have never played for nothing, something about a pot and kettle springs to mind!
I think it said a couple games free entry if you paid on time perhaps. It made our lads appreciate the $70 subs in any case!
by Mythical Creature » Fri May 16, 2014 10:20 am
Ace of Spades wrote:RooShootOhh wrote:Ace, I got told it includes Club membership which has entry to home games and/or tea vouchers or something like that.
Hotspur, know your lads have never played for nothing, something about a pot and kettle springs to mind!
I think it said a couple games free entry if you paid on time perhaps. It made our lads appreciate the $70 subs in any case!
by hotspur » Fri May 16, 2014 10:37 am
by Skip Dimes » Fri May 16, 2014 11:32 am
by OnSong » Fri May 16, 2014 11:39 am
Mythical Creature wrote:Ace of Spades wrote:RooShootOhh wrote:Ace, I got told it includes Club membership which has entry to home games and/or tea vouchers or something like that.
Hotspur, know your lads have never played for nothing, something about a pot and kettle springs to mind!
I think it said a couple games free entry if you paid on time perhaps. It made our lads appreciate the $70 subs in any case!
That $70 bucks should make us appreciate our $55 subs then!
by Mr Beefy » Fri May 16, 2014 12:20 pm
by Skip Dimes » Fri May 16, 2014 12:25 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:I reckon $200 is the lower end of the scale for city clubs. What are the subs supposed to cover?
by Mr Beefy » Fri May 16, 2014 12:31 pm
by Arry Gablett » Fri May 16, 2014 1:59 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |