by jackpot jim » Thu Jul 25, 2013 12:50 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:57 am
by Sky Pilot » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:12 am
jackpot jim wrote:Some like it, Most hate.
Personally, i think there's a place for it if it's implemented properly unlike it is now.
Just watching the ODI between the Windies and Pakistan and Darren Bravo is given Not Out after a caught behind appeal by the whole Pakistani team which means very little as usually as only about 1 in 10 of their appeals are close to being out. Pakistan immediately reviewed the decision. I was surprised that they dont use Hot Spot over there and therefore the decisopn has to be reversed going on the sound and sight of the 3rd umpire viewing the replay.
I was gobsmacked when the decision was overturned and given out based on a faint scratchy type sound as the ball was passing the bat. No deviation was evident.
I thought that for a decision to be overturned that there had to be definitive proof that the original decision was clearly wrong ? How can a faint scratchy sound with no ball deviation be clear proof that the original decision was wrong?
So here we have Hot Spot being used in some countries.
Hot Spot NOT being used in some countries.
DRS NOT being used in any games involving India.
The inconsistencies from country to country with the DRS is joke but what would one expect with the incompetent ICC supposedly in charge of the game.
by heater31 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 12:39 pm
by whufc » Thu Jul 25, 2013 12:56 pm
heater31 wrote:DRS should only ever be in the Hands of the Umpires. Players should have nothing to do with what is and what is not reviewed. Problem solved and everyone is happy bar the Indians probably
by jackpot jim » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:42 pm
Sky Pilot wrote: Is the ICC still housed in India?
by Mr Beefy » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:13 pm
whufc wrote:heater31 wrote:DRS should only ever be in the Hands of the Umpires. Players should have nothing to do with what is and what is not reviewed. Problem solved and everyone is happy bar the Indians probably
Only problem with that is that it would become like the run outs and stumping a where the video review gets used for 99.9% of appeals regardless of how far in or out the batsmen is.
If the umpires were ever in charge there would be seriously no point having them out there and the third umpires just asses every ball
by MAY-Z » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:26 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Some like it, Most hate.
Personally, i think there's a place for it if it's implemented properly unlike it is now.
Just watching the ODI between the Windies and Pakistan and Darren Bravo is given Not Out after a caught behind appeal by the whole Pakistani team which means very little as usually as only about 1 in 10 of their appeals are close to being out. Pakistan immediately reviewed the decision. I was surprised that they dont use Hot Spot over there and therefore the decisopn has to be reversed going on the sound and sight of the 3rd umpire viewing the replay.
I was gobsmacked when the decision was overturned and given out based on a faint scratchy type sound as the ball was passing the bat. No deviation was evident.
I thought that for a decision to be overturned that there had to be definitive proof that the original decision was clearly wrong ? How can a faint scratchy sound with no ball deviation be clear proof that the original decision was wrong?
So here we have Hot Spot being used in some countries.
Hot Spot NOT being used in some countries.
DRS NOT being used in any games involving India.
The inconsistencies from country to country with the DRS is joke but what would one expect with the incompetent ICC supposedly in charge of the game.
by MightyEagles » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:53 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:55 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Some like it, Most hate.
Personally, i think there's a place for it if it's implemented properly unlike it is now.
Just watching the ODI between the Windies and Pakistan and Darren Bravo is given Not Out after a caught behind appeal by the whole Pakistani team which means very little as usually as only about 1 in 10 of their appeals are close to being out. Pakistan immediately reviewed the decision. I was surprised that they dont use Hot Spot over there and therefore the decisopn has to be reversed going on the sound and sight of the 3rd umpire viewing the replay.
I was gobsmacked when the decision was overturned and given out based on a faint scratchy type sound as the ball was passing the bat. No deviation was evident.
I thought that for a decision to be overturned that there had to be definitive proof that the original decision was clearly wrong ? How can a faint scratchy sound with no ball deviation be clear proof that the original decision was wrong?
So here we have Hot Spot being used in some countries.
Hot Spot NOT being used in some countries.
DRS NOT being used in any games involving India.
The inconsistencies from country to country with the DRS is joke but what would one expect with the incompetent ICC supposedly in charge of the game.
by stampy » Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Sat Jul 27, 2013 9:16 pm
stampy wrote:the ICC is a farce, all they do is take it up the arse from the indians everyone knows that
by whufc » Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:23 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:26 pm
by Rik E Boy » Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:28 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:34 pm
by RustyCage » Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:04 am
Jim05 wrote:Its not the technology its the corrupt pricks using it.
A blind man could see that wasnt out, the technology conclusively showed it not out but the third umpire went against technology
by Grahaml » Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:31 am
by JK » Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:34 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Aug 02, 2013 11:27 am
wycbloods wrote:I salute the Indians. They've been right all along. Lets just deal with the umps decisions on the field.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |