by Dols » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:33 pm
by Big Phil » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:36 pm
Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
by Tech1 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:48 pm
Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
by Dols » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:50 pm
show me where that is different for PA?Tech1 wrote:Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
Wrong again
"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."
by heater31 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:51 pm
Dols wrote:show me where that is different for PA?Tech1 wrote:Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
Wrong again
"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."
by Dols » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:52 pm
ian callinan played AFL footy last yearheater31 wrote:Dols wrote:show me where that is different for PA?Tech1 wrote:Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
Wrong again
"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."
Steven Summerton played SANFL league football last season and he is now the bloody captain of the Port Power B grade
by JK » Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:55 pm
by Tech1 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:01 pm
Dols wrote:show me where that is different for PA?Tech1 wrote:Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
Wrong again
"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:02 pm
Dols wrote:show me where that is different for PA?Tech1 wrote:Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
Wrong again
"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."
by Dols » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:07 pm
you can't recruit players that already play for you, they are retained. The same recruiting condition apply. That's why MarlonTech1 wrote:Dols wrote:show me where that is different for PA?Tech1 wrote:Dols wrote:Crows had the same opportunity to sign SANFL players as top up players on $400 a game, so what's the difference? I know what's the difference history and credibility, none of which Adelaide has.
Wrong again
"Should it be necessary, Adelaide may access further ‘top up’ players from community football. These players are not to have played at SANFL level for a minimum of 18 months and will receive $400 per match."
You're not playing with a full deck are you. I just replied to your post, it's pretty straight forward, you where able to keep a bunch of players that played SANFL last year one an ex afl player maybe two ex afl players now on "$400 a game", not just the one leadership player, just like the crows have with Ian Callinan. You decided to keep Slattery as your leadership player and then pay Summerton "$400" a game, because he wasn't 28 yet and didn't qualify to be one.
by Tech1 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:13 pm
by dedja » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:13 pm
Dols wrote:glad you put the + in there.NO-MERCY wrote:Power reserves to win by 60+
by Big Phil » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:15 pm
dedja wrote:Dols wrote:glad you put the + in there.NO-MERCY wrote:Power reserves to win by 60+
Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?
by Dols » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:15 pm
call them what you want #weareportadelaidededja wrote:Dols wrote:glad you put the + in there.NO-MERCY wrote:Power reserves to win by 60+
Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?
by sjt » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:17 pm
by the joker » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:37 pm
by Big Phil » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:43 pm
the joker wrote:There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies
by the joker » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:44 pm
im not sure. But he could get 1500+ to play country. So 400 is way off the markBig Phil wrote:the joker wrote:There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies
Isn't he on a back-ended contract where he will be earning over $100K in 2016?
by Dols » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:45 pm
according to the official figures he is!!! When he turns 28 he will be on much more. Back ended deal!!!!!the joker wrote:There's no way Summo is only on 400 a week at the magpies
by The Dark Knight » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:20 pm
Big Phil wrote:dedja wrote:Dols wrote:glad you put the + in there.NO-MERCY wrote:Power reserves to win by 60+
Did you notice he called them Power Reserves?
Well, they certainly aren't the old Magpies he once loved...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |