LaughingKookaburra wrote:Crows paying $3.50 next week.... Thought it would be far shorter odds than that.
Ooooooooooookaaaaaaaaay......
by Spargo » Sun Sep 13, 2015 9:50 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Crows paying $3.50 next week.... Thought it would be far shorter odds than that.
by LaughingKookaburra » Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:06 pm
by RustyCage » Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:21 am
by MW » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:36 am
by Spargo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:46 am
MW wrote:The rest certainly helped Waite
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:21 am
Spargo wrote:MW wrote:The rest certainly helped Waite
He's kicked more goals this year than he ever did at Carlton, has performed previously in finals and when on song is near impossible to stop.
North have never said he was going to be the answer or a superstar but yesterday showed again why they got him.
All the talk has been around Higgins being the recruit of the year (his AA squad selection justifiably reflects this) but as far as value, remembering we got Waite for nothing, he's been a deadset steal and shut a few people up.
by Dutchy » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:43 pm
bennymacca wrote:reckon they will cop a hiding in the first final anyway, whoever they play.
Cant say they dont deserve to be there, but they are clearly the worst team in the eight imo.
by HH3 » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:28 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:29 pm
Dutchy wrote:bennymacca wrote:reckon they will cop a hiding in the first final anyway, whoever they play.
Cant say they dont deserve to be there, but they are clearly the worst team in the eight imo.
by stan » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:43 pm
HH3 wrote:Rousey2.jpg
by whufc » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:49 pm
stan wrote:HH3 wrote:Rousey2.jpg
If she plays for North this weekend then they'll win by 20 goals.
by Jim05 » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:58 pm
whufc wrote:stan wrote:HH3 wrote:Rousey2.jpg
If she plays for North this weekend then they'll win by 20 goals.
Nick Dal Santo has the 'i love this but my wife is gonna kill me' face!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Spargo » Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:30 pm
bennymacca wrote:Dutchy wrote:bennymacca wrote:reckon they will cop a hiding in the first final anyway, whoever they play.
Cant say they dont deserve to be there, but they are clearly the worst team in the eight imo.
no doubt about it, they played well. Still reckon it says more about richmond than north that Richmond finished 5th and lost though.
And cheers for pointing out when i was wrong. I guess that makes it cool for me to do the same for you now?
by Grahaml » Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:53 pm
Spargo wrote:bennymacca wrote:Dutchy wrote:bennymacca wrote:reckon they will cop a hiding in the first final anyway, whoever they play.
Cant say they dont deserve to be there, but they are clearly the worst team in the eight imo.
no doubt about it, they played well. Still reckon it says more about richmond than north that Richmond finished 5th and lost though.
And cheers for pointing out when i was wrong. I guess that makes it cool for me to do the same for you now?
All's fair.....
No doubt if we happen to get up this week it will say more about Sydney.
by whufc » Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:57 pm
=))
no doubt about it, they played well. Still reckon it says more about richmond than north that Richmond finished 5th and lost though.
And cheers for pointing out when i was wrong. I guess that makes it cool for me to do the same for you now?
All's fair.....
No doubt if we happen to get up this week it will say more about Sydney.
I get the meaning behind the comment but it's always going to say a lot about a side if they drop two finals in a row under the current system.
But North have done well IMHO. The guys they've picked up in recent years seem to keep proving themselves. But I wonder whether it's doing anything but keeping North competitive. Both ends of the ground are solid but not outstanding. But the midfield is interesting. They have a couple really good inside mids that will always be competitive, especially as long as Goldstein is the benchmark of the competition for rucks. But once the ball is won I wonder who does the damage. Wells SHOULD have been the bloke and with Harvey they could have lit up a premiership midfield. But without that superstar calibre damaging player it all looks a bit too workmanlike. Without getting into the top 5 on draft day it gets harder for any side not named Collingwood, Hawthorn or Sydney to find (or poach) one.
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:42 pm
by whufc » Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:14 pm
bennymacca wrote:How can giving up nothing for a then 26 year old who has kicked 114 goals in the past two years and will be an all australian this year be anything but a great move?
by MW » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:01 am
by stan » Thu Sep 17, 2015 10:12 am
MW wrote:Anyone who thinks getting Betts wasn't a good move is delusional
by Booney » Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:09 am
whufc wrote:stan wrote:HH3 wrote:Rousey2.jpg
If she plays for North this weekend then they'll win by 20 goals.
Nick Dal Santo has the 'i love this but my wife is gonna kill me' face!!!!!!!!!!!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |