All jokes aside
Is there some kind of underlying culture problem within the Crows.
You have the history of Tippettgate and Steven Trigg
The state Guernsey saga
You've got Dangerfield leaving to go home despite the risk he may not end up at his desired destination, this is despite the fact the Crows would appear on field to be in a better position than any of his suitors.
Bernie Vince leaves in surprising circumstances and becomes an all australian two years later
Player/Club Being investigated by integrity unit
Jaench and his indiscretion
Camporeale despite getting good results does not want to be their head coach
Worsfold look set to move to another state (non home state as well) to take up a role with a club who seem in a far worse situation than the Crows)
CEO now under investigation for prior indiscretion, admittedly nothing to do with Adelaide but he does now represent them.
This has all happened within 3 years and in the case of Camporeale, Worsfold, Dangerfield even more surprising in the wake of the Phil Walsh tragedy, in which footy clubs are generally associated with a 'we'll stick together and create something special' attitude rather than people moving in their own direction
Obviously I am very anti crows but does this make any sense or are they a victim of circumstances.
It's odd that two coaches who can do the top job don't want it. I can understand Dangerfield wanting to head home.
From my perspective, the whole club has a culture issue because it's identity is shaped by marketing campaigns and catchy slogans, as opposed to having a defined 'turf' and celebrating it's history and achievements, and most who support and manage the club don't see a problem with that. Whether there's a player culture problem, only the players can answer that.
Mind you, with Mark 'The Godfather' Riccuito now unofficially running the club with an iron fist, and other intellectual luminaries like Nigel Smart floating around West Lakes I'm not sure I can blame Campo and Woosha.