Page 70 of 75

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:31 pm
by Mr Fuller
Brodlach wrote:Nathan Krakour and Marlon Motlop training with the Magpies.

Wonder if West get a transfer fee for Motlop ;)

Didnt Krakour walkout on the Power?

http://sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/2386/


The article makes it sound as if Mieklejohn could be a chance to resume with the magpies at some point.

I reckon the Power side will be a fair bit stronger than the Crows side.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:45 pm
by kickinit
Mr Fuller wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Nathan Krakour and Marlon Motlop training with the Magpies.

Wonder if West get a transfer fee for Motlop ;)

Didnt Krakour walkout on the Power?

http://sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/2386/


The article makes it sound as if Mieklejohn could be a chance to resume with the magpies at some point.

I reckon the Power side will be a fair bit stronger than the Crows side.


At what point did you come to this conclusion.

Former Port Magpies captain James Meiklejohn has also been spotted on the training track but a surprise comeback isn’t on the cards.

‘’Jimmy has been back once a week doing some ruckwork with our young players which has been great,’’ Peters said.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:54 pm
by TimmiesChin
daysofourlives wrote:Marlon Motlop at Port too apparently.
So Krakouer and Motlop on 400 when im sure there would be country/amateur clubs offering double that minimum.
Either Port are pissing in their ear about an AFL contract if they perform or they are getting some cash under the table


Not sure the country clubs could give them exposure to (all 18) afl clubs though, which would be a carrot if they are serious.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:09 am
by The Sleeping Giant
Those two have been thoroughly exposed.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 1:08 pm
by beenreal
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Those two have been thoroughly exposed.


As being young and immature?

Word is Freo were looking at Motlop this year but he wanted to come back to SA. Krakouer isn't the first young player to chase the big coin and won't be the last. At 26-27, he's the same age as Monfies when the PAFC recruited him.

Happy to give them a go, first at a Magpies Premiership, then at an AFL list.

8)

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:22 pm
by Booney
beenreal wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Those two have been thoroughly exposed.


As being young and immature?

Word is Freo were looking at Motlop this year but he wanted to come back to SA. Krakouer isn't the first young player to chase the big coin and won't be the last. At 26-27, he's the same age as Monfies when the PAFC recruited him.

Happy to give them a go, first at a Magpies Premiership, then at an AFL list.

8)


I think ( and I agree ) with TSG that Motlop was exposed as not being up to AFL standard, he isn't. Fremantle would have "looked" at potentially dozens of players.

Krakouer I think was up to AFL football, ability wise, mind set and application the jury has reached it's verdict on.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:42 pm
by o five
Motlops a spud. I wouldn`t even have him as a top up player :oops:

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:54 pm
by FOOTY TALK
Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:57 pm
by Dutchy
FOOTY TALK wrote:Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.


ha, quality work by Port...

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:01 pm
by Booney
Dutchy wrote:
FOOTY TALK wrote:Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.


ha, quality work by Motlop...


For accuracy.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 4:30 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Quality work all round

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:41 pm
by Dutchy
Booney wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
FOOTY TALK wrote:Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.


ha, quality work by Motlop...


For accuracy.


Surely Port would have done their due diligence?

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:04 pm
by Dols
FOOTY TALK wrote:Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.

Part of the rules of port coming into comp were that they could not recruit anyone that has been on an afl or state league team in the preceding 18 months.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:37 pm
by SimonH
Dols wrote:
FOOTY TALK wrote:Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.

Part of the rules of port coming into comp were that they could not recruit anyone that has been on an afl or state league team in the preceding 18 months.
But Marlon Motlop was at a state league team in 2013—Peel Thunder. So if that rule existed, Port could never have taken him (and therefore it would have been inappropriate for them to announce he was training with them). No such rule is in the press release version of the rules for the entry of the Pahhhhhhhr seconds into the SANFL competition, quoted in the thread dedicated to that team. I doubt if it exists.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:41 pm
by Dols
SimonH wrote:
Dols wrote:
FOOTY TALK wrote:Motlop already gone apparently forgot to tell port he still contracted to peel thunder and they found out he was training at port and want port to pay a fee and port have said no.

Part of the rules of port coming into comp were that they could not recruit anyone that has been on an afl or state league team in the preceding 18 months.
But Marlon Motlop was at a state league team in 2013—Peel Thunder. So if that rule existed, Port could never have taken him (and therefore it would have been inappropriate for them to announce he was training with them). No such rule is in the press release version of the rules for the entry of the Pahhhhhhhr seconds into the SANFL competition, quoted in the thread dedicated to that team. I doubt if it exists.
not according to Gary Hocking on radio yesterday

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:06 am
by Apachebulldog
Looks like the SANFL and the PAFC make up the rules as they go along anything to give the POWSERVES an already and a further huge advantage over all the SANFL teams.

Comp Integrity gone YES

Comp Compromised YES

SANFL Faaarked YES

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:09 am
by o five
Agree! This really is turning out to be a joke :oops:

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:44 pm
by kickinit
Apachebulldog wrote:Looks like the SANFL and the PAFC make up the rules as they go along anything to give the POWSERVES an already and a further huge advantage over all the SANFL teams.

Comp Integrity gone YES

Comp Compromised YES

SANFL Faaarked YES


apachebulldog needs to stop crying about this YES

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:36 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
o five wrote:Agree! This really is turning out to be a joke :oops:


I fear it will just get worse.

Re: Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:13 am
by blueandwhite
Former Eagle, former Panther,former Magpie....Craig Parry apparently playing for Mclaren Vale in the GSFL....for huge coin..