SA Footy

Booney wrote:

CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.

Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.

And you lot go on about copping it on these threads...

kickinit wrote:Didn't you know that it is all PAFC fault.

Finally... Clarity at long last

Booney wrote:

CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.

Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.

How f***ing hard is it for a Port supporter to keep to the point that they're quoting on? Seriously! SANFL agreed to Ports second One Club Proposal. Of which a major part of it was that Magpies wouldn't be a Power reserves. In the following couple of years Port started moving 'disgruntled players straight back to the Magpies, not to the lowest SANFL club on the table as was the rule. Shortly after that the PAFC pushed very strongly to turn the Magpies into a Power reserves team, disregarding the promise to the Magpies members and the SANFL only a few years before.
So don't put it on the SANFL clubs or the presidents that voted for allowing bastardised AFL reserves teams in, blame your f***ing board that turned turtle on its word once again. They pushed for it and they drove the agenda.
The arguments put forward on here by Port supporters are pathetic in the attempt or verging on a schizophrenic disorder.
F***! If the club I played for promised me that we'd stay as a stand alone SANFL team and three years later I find out they've lied I'd f***ing walk out too.

Macca19 wrote:Beard was ordinary

Not sure what game you were watching? Certainly didn't have his best day but was by no means ordinary. Not dirty that he left Port, are you?

Some would say that Soberaj was best for the Magpies...

CUTTERMAN wrote:

Booney wrote:

CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.

Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.

How f***ing hard is it for a Port supporter to keep to the point that they're quoting on? Seriously! SANFL agreed to Ports second One Club Proposal. Of which a major part of it was that Magpies wouldn't be a Power reserves. In the following couple of years Port started moving 'disgruntled players straight back to the Magpies, not to the lowest SANFL club on the table as was the rule. Shortly after that the PAFC pushed very strongly to turn the Magpies into a Power reserves team, disregarding the promise to the Magpies members and the SANFL only a few years before.
So don't put it on the SANFL clubs or the presidents that voted for allowing bastardised AFL reserves teams in, blame your f***ing board that turned turtle on its word once again. They pushed for it and they drove the agenda.
The arguments put forward on here by Port supporters are pathetic in the attempt or verging on a schizophrenic disorder.
F***! If the club I played for promised me that we'd stay as a stand alone SANFL team and three years later I find out they've lied I'd f***ing walk out too.

Another history lesson, according to Cutterman. Thanks mate.

You weren't in front of the stand calling us "cheating wharfie scum" and then telling us "it's your first year in the league", were you? Can't see how you can have it both ways. Anywho, that's Sturt fans for you......

Anyway, Aaron Young very good in the middle, Robbie Young made the most of his opportunities kicking well in front of goal, Summerton again prolific in the midfield and Clurey held the back half together.

Must have been a few folks out early on the park, not one Beagledoogle-spaniel sausage on the ground!

Nup not me. But maybe the bloke has a point.

Sturt certainly had their chances but Port's structure held them up well on the counter attack. I would be pretty confident Sturt can beat Port even with their current line up, which will only be weaker come finals time.

Crowd 2,561

pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?

You are aware that there are more former Sturt juniors on Port's AFL list than former Port juniors on Sturt's list aren't you?
How many "one club" juniors are on your AFL list? Is this number greater than, less than or equal to the number of Sturt juniors?

SANFLnut wrote:

pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?

You are aware that there are more former Sturt juniors on Port's AFL list than former Port juniors on Sturt's list aren't you?
How many "one club" juniors are on your AFL list? Is this number greater than, less than or equal to the number of Sturt juniors?

3 Sturt Monfries Wingard Hombsch and 2 Port Sam Gray Ebert. Not a good argument though as theres a lot of Port lads they would have drafted if they could have. They have 5 Eagles lads on their list and I reckon the Crows have a few as well.

maxi wrote:Not a good argument though as theres a lot of Port lads they would have drafted if they could have.

What stopped them?

Have you seen the Magpies over the last decade or so?

Booney wrote:

CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.

Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.

Oh I see those blokes walked out on Port due to Sturt voting yes.
Strewth, the reserves entering our comp has resulted in a lot of screwed up posts on this board. Just throw all reason out the window as long as your yapping in favour of the Power or Crows.

As for the match, I thought Sturt had their chances. The ball spent a lot of time up our end for little result in that final quarter. Hopefully learn from the loss.

They're stuck on the Kockian default setting Theri of blaming everybody else. But they do the heavy lifting.....cough

pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?

If the best sturt players had gone to Magpies, they would be in the best players every week too

ORDoubleBlues wrote:

pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?

If the best sturt players had gone to Magpies, they would be in the best players every week too

Obviously the umpires agreed!

ORDoubleBlues wrote:

pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?

If the best sturt players had gone to Magpies, they would be in the best players every week too

And in the reserves and not playing in a GF today