SA Footy

Jim05 wrote:Us by 3-4 goals

DOC wrote:Legs by 4 goals

Close enough Jim & DOC !!!
Could I impose upon you both the choice of my X-Lotto numbers for a few weeks fellas ?
Please PM me, we don't wan't to split the prize too many ways.

Luv,
Sabre.

Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players

Jim05 wrote:

mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players

And maybe Lukosius...

Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy. Premiership favs without doubt.

I thought the 1st quarter was befitting of a 1 v 2 contest. Best standard of footy I've seen for ages.

After that, I might go out on a limb and say it was the best standard of footy by one side I've seen live since Centrals were at their peak.

wedgetail wrote:Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy. Premiership favs without doubt.

That's what I noticed when the Legs belted us at the Parade a couple of months ago. Even when they won their Premierships, these were based on a defensive-first philosophy which would have bored even the most ardent Leg supporters. Now they have been given license to run and gun and stun, and are playing without fear of making errors.
2018 is their Premiership to lose

PS.... why are Grigg and Panos not seen as AFL players? Grigg is like a man amongst boys at SANFL level whilst Panos is a Pendlebury clone who kicks more goals … whats not to like?

Aerie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players

And maybe Lukosius...

I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come

northerner wrote:

wedgetail wrote:Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy.
Premiership favs without doubt.

That's what I noticed when the Legs belted us at the Parade a couple of months ago. Even when they won their Premierships, these were based on a defensive-first philosophy which would have bored even the most ardent Leg supporters. Now they have been given license to run and gun and stun, and are playing without fear of making errors.
2018 is their Premiership to lose

PS.... why are Grigg and Panos not seen as AFL players? Grigg is like a man amongst boys at
SANFL level whilst Panos is a Pendlebury clone who kicks more goals … whats not to like?

Dearest 'northerner',
Your outrageously accurate appraisal is most annoying.
Will you please shut the f**k up before we lose what's taken 3 years to build ?
A quick 'whip-around' within the Cheer/Grog Squad has raised $1,369.50 to get you to delete your post before AFL
a*******s see it and destroy us yet again. Please stop being so candid mate. We want another dynasty just like you had.
Is that asking too much? Please, please mate, we're begging you. Stop telling the truth !!!

Luv,
Sabre.

p.s. Pendlebury??? Surely Matty Panos is far more like Robbie Flower !!!

Spargo wrote:

Aerie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players

And maybe Lukosius...

I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come

They have seen plenty of him and like all clubs would rate him highly. I was definitely told they were going to state leagues to check out mature players for their later picks as they need to get some bigger bodies and nouse in there. For clubs at the bottom of the ladder their later picks and mature agers are often the difference

Jim05 wrote:

Spargo wrote:

Aerie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:[quote="mal"]Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players

And maybe Lukosius...

I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come [emoji38]

They have seen plenty of him and like all clubs would rate him highly. I was definitely told they were going to state leagues to check out mature players for their later picks as they need to get some bigger bodies and nouse in there. For clubs at the bottom of the ladder their later picks and mature agers are often the difference[/quote]This may end up frustrating if say we lost a Grigg or Panos type of player due to the Gold Coast being a massive shit factory.

Looking forward to the rape and pillage.

Much sooner lose them (and any other player) interstate rather than locally

JK wrote:Much sooner lose them (and any other player) interstate rather than locally

Can you not just match what the AFL side have to offer and keep them here. Money not an issue.

stan wrote:This may end up frustrating if say we lost a Grigg or Panos type of player due to the Gold Coast being a massive shit factory.

Looking forward to the rape and pillage.

Been there done that... Nick Holman. Ouch!