Re: Glenelg Senior Coach 2014
Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 3:37 pm
Good call. The two best decisions this off season were to not take on Rehn at Glenelg and Collins at South.
Because we want Glenelg to be shitter than us for evermaxyoz wrote:Hooray - I don't give a rats arse about any of you other lots clubs or your sh!t coaches, so why are you so interested in ours?
dedja wrote:15688 posts so my dick's bigger ...
Anyway, congrats to Nick and all the best.
Ian wrote:Because we want Glenelg to be shitter than us for evermaxyoz wrote:Hooray - I don't give a rats arse about any of you other lots clubs or your sh!t coaches, so why are you so interested in ours?
dedja wrote:Yep, the short lived Don Scott era was certainly a pain in the arse ...
Booney wrote:"The whole thing is 150% false" - said Stevens.
woodublieve12 wrote:Booney wrote:"The whole thing is 150% false" - said Stevens.
Hypnotist: You are all very good players
Team: We are all very good players.
Hypnotist: You will beat Shelbyville.
Team: We will beat Shelbyville.
Hypnotist: You will give 110 percent.
Team: That's impossible no one can give more than 100 percent. By definition that's the most any one can give.
i love the simpsons...
luketorrens wrote:After watching my sister stay, leave, keep going back into an abusive relationship, this bloke needs to go if proven guilty in court. It takes women years and about 5 attempts to leave before the finally leave an abusive man. This is not cool for Glenelg or the SANFL. Unlikely that police would follow through with charges unless the evidence is there.
heater31 wrote:luketorrens wrote:After watching my sister stay, leave, keep going back into an abusive relationship, this bloke needs to go if proven guilty in court. It takes women years and about 5 attempts to leave before the finally leave an abusive man. This is not cool for Glenelg or the SANFL. Unlikely that police would follow through with charges unless the evidence is there.
You would think if proven to be guilty he would not be able to complete his Glenelg obligations anyway.
luketorrens wrote:heater31 wrote:luketorrens wrote:After watching my sister stay, leave, keep going back into an abusive relationship, this bloke needs to go if proven guilty in court. It takes women years and about 5 attempts to leave before the finally leave an abusive man. This is not cool for Glenelg or the SANFL. Unlikely that police would follow through with charges unless the evidence is there.
You would think if proven to be guilty he would not be able to complete his Glenelg obligations anyway.
My sister's ex got a suspended sentence and I think a good behaviour bond so could continue to work but there is no place in the SANFL for a coach whose been found guilty of domestic violence. Glenelg probably should start considering their option. Police don't waste the time of the courts for nothing. They will have evidence.