Page 3 of 7

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:15 pm
by mighty hounds
locky801 wrote:
stan wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Sturt by 4-5 goals.
The Port inclusions will be short of a gallop and take a couple of weeks to hit to their straps. Wouldn’t be surprised if Dixon barely gets a touch in his first start
I can't see Dixon doing much, I mean has only done some running really. Will be blowing hard after a few efforts.



Charlies kicked a lazy 5 so far


The difference in the end. Bloody miss having a key forward. Won't win a flag without one

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:02 pm
by Booney
Old mate Ben Hansen had to be restrained from engaging further with the bowling club partons. Soon after he went to the rooms before 3/4 time but emerged soon after. Once the game finished he left the ground before anyone else.

Funny guy.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:06 pm
by therisingblues
Final Score
Port 12:13-85
Sturt 10:5-65
Charlie, son of Dick, kicked 5.
Sturt were always going to struggle against THAT "Magpies" side, especially with one week's less rest. Apparently a massive Port crowd at their home ground also. Would be interesting to hear how many, exactly, or see some pictures.

Sturt, still in the 5, for now.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:08 pm
by Booney
therisingblues wrote:Final Score
Port 12:13-85
Sturt 10:5-65
Charlie, son of Dick, kicked 5.
Sturt were always going to struggle against THAT "Magpies" side, especially with one week's less rest. Apparently a massive Port crowd at their home ground also. Would be interesting to hear how many, exactly, or see some pictures.

Sturt, still in the 5, for now.


I'd guess 4000+.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:15 pm
by therisingblues
Booney wrote:
therisingblues wrote:Final Score
Port 12:13-85
Sturt 10:5-65
Charlie, son of Dick, kicked 5.
Sturt were always going to struggle against THAT "Magpies" side, especially with one week's less rest. Apparently a massive Port crowd at their home ground also. Would be interesting to hear how many, exactly, or see some pictures.

Sturt, still in the 5, for now.


I'd guess 4000+.

Cheers. I'll go with your estimate. Someone suggested 20.000, so I thought I'd ask.
Sounds like you were there Booney! Not in the bowling club I hope?

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:55 pm
by Brett
Booney wrote:Old mate Ben Hansen had to be restrained from engaging further with the bowling club partons. Soon after he went to the rooms before 3/4 time but emerged soon after. Once the game finished he left the ground before anyone else.

Funny guy.


I think you mean half time after he too a huge fly. He would have been about 20 metres away and didn't even look at the Bowling fogies ? Good story though. Restrained ?

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:01 pm
by Booney
Brett wrote:
Booney wrote:Old mate Ben Hansen had to be restrained from engaging further with the bowling club partons. Soon after he went to the rooms before 3/4 time but emerged soon after. Once the game finished he left the ground before anyone else.

Funny guy.


I think you mean half time after he too a huge fly. He would have been about 20 metres away and didn't even look at the Bowling fogies ? Good story though. Restrained ?


Yes, restrained, dragged away, removed, taken away etc.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:05 pm
by Booney
When did he cause the umpire to take it off Sturt while they were lining up for goal for abusing the umpire?

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:37 pm
by Brett
Booney wrote:
Brett wrote:
Booney wrote:Old mate Ben Hansen had to be restrained from engaging further with the bowling club partons. Soon after he went to the rooms before 3/4 time but emerged soon after. Once the game finished he left the ground before anyone else.

Funny guy.


I think you mean half time after he too a huge fly. He would have been about 20 metres away and didn't even look at the Bowling fogies ? Good story though. Restrained ?


Yes, restrained, dragged away, removed, taken away etc.


Yep and over the fence throwing punches .

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:39 pm
by Brett
Booney wrote:When did he cause the umpire to take it off Sturt while they were lining up for goal for abusing the umpire?


Im trying to decipher this.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:43 pm
by Brett
I think you should provide some feedback to the franchise . Have people on gates to allow them in and suggest a way to stop whinging about no money would be to have facilities open around the ground so people can buy something.

Back to the footy and how good was Frampton today .

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:12 pm
by Booney
Brett wrote:I think you should provide some feedback to the franchise . Have people on gates to allow them in and suggest a way to stop whinging about no money would be to have facilities open around the ground so people can buy something.

Back to the footy and how good was Frampton today .


Like Pearce he didn't actually play.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:55 pm
by Brett
Booney wrote:
Brett wrote:I think you should provide some feedback to the franchise . Have people on gates to allow them in and suggest a way to stop whinging about no money would be to have facilities open around the ground so people can buy something.

Back to the footy and how good was Frampton today .


Like Pearce he didn't actually play.


Umm.............. yeah OK.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:58 pm
by bertiebeatle
Brett wrote:
Booney wrote:
Brett wrote:I think you should provide some feedback to the franchise . Have people on gates to allow them in and suggest a way to stop whinging about no money would be to have facilities open around the ground so people can buy something.

Back to the footy and how good was Frampton today .


Like Pearce he didn't actually play.


Umm.............. yeah OK.


You that cooked in the head to not know who actually played and who didn’t?
Surely you must be related to Wedgie or MW?

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:11 pm
by Wedgie
bertiebeatle wrote:
Brett wrote:
Booney wrote:
Brett wrote:I think you should provide some feedback to the franchise . Have people on gates to allow them in and suggest a way to stop whinging about no money would be to have facilities open around the ground so people can buy something.

Back to the footy and how good was Frampton today .


Like Pearce he didn't actually play.


Umm.............. yeah OK.


You that cooked in the head to not know who actually played and who didn’t?
Surely you must be related to Wedgie or MW?

Booooooooooooo

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:12 pm
by Brett
Oh well how good are you. I thought I heard Frampton was in ruck.Like your mob I , like many , dont know many Port players . Did you go today and were you one of the many wearing Green. Go back under your rock like the majority of your Franchise .

Daniel Pearce played .

Good attempt at humour though.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:41 pm
by bertiebeatle
Brett wrote:Oh well how good are you. I thought I heard Frampton was in ruck.Like your mob I , like many , dont know many Port players . Did you go today and were you one of the many wearing Green. Go back under your rock like the majority of your Franchise .

Daniel Pearce played .

Good attempt at humour though.


Type in www.sanfl.com.au & you can easily find the team lists. I understand that might be a bit too difficult for you to do before throwing rubbish comments out there but at least try. Also I don’t recall ever mentioning Pearce but anyway

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:58 pm
by MW
bertiebeatle wrote:
Brett wrote:
Booney wrote:
Brett wrote:I think you should provide some feedback to the franchise . Have people on gates to allow them in and suggest a way to stop whinging about no money would be to have facilities open around the ground so people can buy something.

Back to the footy and how good was Frampton today .


Like Pearce he didn't actually play.


Umm.............. yeah OK.


You that cooked in the head to not know who actually played and who didn’t?
Surely you must be related to Wedgie or MW?


What the fk? I don't even know who you are.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:55 am
by stan
This is becoming a strange thread.

Re: Port v Sturt Sat 1410

PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:45 am
by Booney
Brett wrote:Oh well how good are you. I thought I heard Frampton was in ruck.Like your mob I , like many , dont know many Port players . Did you go today and were you one of the many wearing Green. Go back under your rock like the majority of your Franchise .

Daniel Pearce played .

Good attempt at humour though.


He didn't. Danyle did though.