SA Footy

LPH wrote:Re: Eagles comment - Have you not been listening?

Please explain to us all again, how the Port Adelaide Magpies still exist & have claim to the 36 Premierships

Well, I guess nobody won them then, if Port didn't?

The current 'Magpies'?

I like how you paraphrase statements to concoct an argument - quite devious

Haven't you been listening?

How could a reserves team claim league premierships? That's just silly. Our league team has the 36 premierships, plus one more from the competition it currently plays in

Rising Power wrote:How could a reserves team claim league premierships? That's just silly. Our league team has the 36 premierships, plus one more from the competition it currently plays in

Cool, add Liverpools and Yankees wins to North's tally too, makes just as much sense

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... Port Supporters think they are still one of the best supported clubs in the SANFL. Obviously didn't attend the finals this year where they had a pathetic turnout.

"It is an excuse for the SANFL clubs to try and generate another couple of home games for themselves for the all-mighty (sic) dollar"

"The boycott from Port Adelaide fans if this happens will be very real".

Someone might like to point out to the author of the above that on 2015 figures the Smearpies have the second smallest away-game crowd of the ten teams. Any financial gain to a SANFL club hosting an extra home game (note: singular) would be minimal, and a boycott from the few remaining dinkum Port fans would hardly be noticed.

cennals05 wrote:HAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... Port Supporters think they are still one of the best supported clubs in the SANFL. Obviously didn't attend the finals this year where they had a pathetic turnout.

Care to reference where this was written and by whom?

Rising Power wrote:

cennals05 wrote:HAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... Port Supporters think they are still one of the best supported clubs in the SANFL. Obviously didn't attend the finals this year where they had a pathetic turnout.

Care to reference where this was written and by whom?

http://www.fansunite.com.au/2015/09/21/ ... to-grow-up

Poor Port. Always the victims.

Pseudo wrote:"It is an excuse for the SANFL clubs to try and generate another couple of home games for themselves for the all-mighty (sic) dollar"

"The boycott from Port Adelaide fans if this happens will be very real".

Someone might like to point out to the author of the above that on 2015 figures the Smearpies have the second smallest away-game crowd of the ten teams. Any financial gain to a SANFL club hosting an extra home game (note: singular) would be minimal, and a boycott from the few remaining dinkum Port fans would hardly be noticed.

Yep laughed at that, surely you are still alot better off getting 1500 of your own supporters and 0 Port supporters to your own ground than getting 1000 Port people and 1000 of your own away supporters.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibx1lwtcOoU




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dols wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibx1lwtcOoU




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relevance to this thread?

Spargo wrote:

Dols wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibx1lwtcOoU




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relevance to this thread?

quite relevant. Hoses down all your theories about not wanting to win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Spargo wrote:

Dols wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibx1lwtcOoU
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relevance to this thread?

You'll need to quote about 2308 comments on here mate.

Dols wrote:

Spargo wrote:

Dols wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibx1lwtcOoU




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relevance to this thread?

quite relevant. Hoses down all your theories about not wanting to win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

Dols wrote:

Spargo wrote:

Dols wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ibx1lwtcOoU




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relevance to this thread?

quite relevant. Hoses down all your theories about not wanting to win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.

are you calling chad a lier?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chad will do what he is told.

Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.[/quote]are you calling chad a lier?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

What's a "lier" ?

twosheds wrote:Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.

are you calling chad a lier?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

What's a "lier" ?[/quote]a lier is a typo, your dad not pulling out is a big mistake


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dols wrote:

PatowalongaPirate wrote:
Au contraire, the primary focus of the power reserves is to develop players for the league side - not win games of football. Whilst I'm sure the players give their all and try to win; this is not the number 1 directive that will be given to Chad.

are you calling chad a liar?

100% YES!!!!