SA Footy

Spargo wrote:

Booney wrote:Short.

Ridiculously short. I’ll admit I had a crack at them at $5 preseason then got $8 after round 1, but even money in this comp? Pass…

Just keep rolling money into em. Better than bank interest.

.

Spargo wrote:.

Lol
Norwood 2 games plus percentage behind the Dogs with 6 to go and we are “even” with them.
What’s that saying about fools and money?

Jim05 wrote:

Spargo wrote:.

Lol
Norwood 2 games plus percentage behind the Dogs with 6 to go and we are “even” with them.
What’s that saying about fools and money?

all it shows is that the bookies are spineless

stampy wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Spargo wrote:.

Lol
Norwood 2 games plus percentage behind the Dogs with 6 to go and we are “even” with them.
What’s that saying about fools and money?

all it shows is that the bookies are spineless

Yep, I haven’t been able to get on Glenelg since Round 5. Had to use different mates’ accounts.

mal wrote:RD10 LADDER

GL
ST
AC
CD
EG
PA
NA
WA
SA
NW

This is how I reckon the Minor Round will finish

GL
ST
AC
EG
NA
CD
PA
WA
SA
NW

R13 LADDER
GL
ST
AC
PA
NA
CD
EG
SA
WA
NW

MY REVISED FINISH
GL
AC
ST
PA
NA
EG
NW
SA
WA

PA has improved heeps
NW can now avoid the wooden spoon

mal wrote:

mal wrote:RD10 LADDER

GL
ST
AC
CD
EG
PA
NA
WA
SA
NW

This is how I reckon the Minor Round will finish

GL
ST
AC
EG
NA
CD
PA
WA
SA
NW

R13 LADDER
GL
ST
AC
PA
NA
CD
EG
SA
WA
NW

MY REVISED FINISH
GL
AC
ST
PA
NA
EG
NW
SA
WA

PA has improved heeps
NW can now avoid the wooden spoon

Excuse me, but where are we?

Merging with the Eagles? They’re good at that….

Agenda item 1, The Menzels….

am Bays wrote:Merging with the Eagles? They’re good at that….

Agenda item 1, The Menzels….

Why would we want to merge with the Eagles if the Menzels aren't there!

gazzamagoo wrote:

am Bays wrote:Merging with the Eagles? They’re good at that….

Agenda item 1, The Menzels….

Why would we want to merge with the Eagles if the Menzels aren't there!

gazzamagoo wrote:

mal wrote:

mal wrote:RD10 LADDER

GL
ST
AC
CD
EG
PA
NA
WA
SA
NW

This is how I reckon the Minor Round will finish

GL
ST
AC
EG
NA
CD
PA
WA
SA
NW

R13 LADDER
GL
ST
AC
PA
NA
CD
EG
SA
WA
NW

MY REVISED FINISH
GL
AC
ST
PA
NA
EG
NW
SA
WA

PA has improved heeps
NW can now avoid the wooden spoon

Excuse me, but where are we?

CD 6TH
But with a tERrifIC finish can get as high as 4th

.

Norwood and West are now out of comtention, given that they are 4 games out of the 5 with 4 games remaining, and the two teams on 7 wins (NA and CD) have 2 points to split between them in the penultimate round.

I wonder what odds will be offered for a Legs flag this week?

Similarly, Sturt and the Bays are now certs for September action. Even if Sturt lost all its remaining games, CD and NA can't both win all remaining games.

.

Spargo wrote:.

These odds highlight an issue that I think should be outlawed.
It is impossible for Norwood and West to now make the finals, therefore betting agencies should not be allowed to take bets on them,
They are both 4 games behind both North and Central with 4 games to go, but given that North still are to play Central neither Norwood nor West can make the five.

robranisgod wrote:

Spargo wrote:.

These odds highlight an issue that I think should be outlawed.
It is impossible for Norwood and West to now make the finals, therefore betting agencies should not be allowed to take bets on them,
They are both 4 games behind both North and Central with 4 games to go, but given that North still are to play Central neither Norwood nor West can make the five.

What if the NA v CD game was a draw?

Then they'll each earn a point, and West/Norwood still can't catch either of them.

Barring someone having points docked somehow, it's mathematically impossible for either West or Norwood to make finals. I agree that betting agencies should not lawfully be able to take bets on such outcomes.

RB wrote:Then they'll each earn a point, and West/Norwood still can't catch either of them.

Barring someone having points docked somehow, it's mathematically impossible for either West or Norwood to make finals. I agree that betting agencies should not lawfully be able to take bets on such outcomes.

Perhaps Norwood could arrange for North to field a 19th man this weekend.

Pseudo wrote:

RB wrote:Then they'll each earn a point, and West/Norwood still can't catch either of them.

Barring someone having points docked somehow, it's mathematically impossible for either West or Norwood to make finals. I agree that betting agencies should not lawfully be able to take bets on such outcomes.

Perhaps Norwood could arrange for North to field a 19th man this weekend.

That would be appropriate given that Norwood did it at the start of the last quarter of the 1982 Second Semi Final and didn't even get a fine.
Different times of course, but I always think of opposing coach, John Cahill's comment at the time, that he would hate to win a game by demanding a count.

Assuming Port Reserves finish 4th, whoever finishes 5th would have to play a port side able to play as many AFL listed players as they want, given the AFL side is in the finals. Correct or no?