Pseudo wrote:a stately pleasuredome in Xanadu...
A disused roller skating rink in Los Angeles co-owned by Gene Kelly, from what I remember.
by Magellan » Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:36 am
Pseudo wrote:a stately pleasuredome in Xanadu...
by Rising Power » Thu Mar 10, 2016 12:03 pm
by Booney » Thu Mar 10, 2016 12:16 pm
by Mickyj » Thu Mar 10, 2016 12:17 pm
Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
by stan » Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:08 pm
Mickyj wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
Does make you wonder why a media station with a port Adelaide fan in its team brings up no reserves cause that means no port academy side
by stan » Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:09 pm
Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
by Booney » Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:10 pm
stan wrote:Mickyj wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
Does make you wonder why a media station with a port Adelaide fan in its team brings up no reserves cause that means no port academy side
Not really the blokes an idiot.
MMM are all about spruking rumours, the best one was a runmour a few years back that Jars on MMM ran with in which it turned out the origns of it were via a deliberate troll on Big footy. So really anything coming from MMM is most likely speculation at best.
by Magellan » Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:43 pm
Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
by bennymacca » Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:58 pm
Booney wrote:stan wrote:Mickyj wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
Does make you wonder why a media station with a port Adelaide fan in its team brings up no reserves cause that means no port academy side
Not really the blokes an idiot.
MMM are all about spruking rumours, the best one was a runmour a few years back that Jars on MMM ran with in which it turned out the origns of it were via a deliberate troll on Big footy. So really anything coming from MMM is most likely speculation at best.
MMM are the bottom of the barrel when it comes to any sort of credibility in any form. Music and sport the two they have the least clue about.
by therisingblues » Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:02 pm
Pseudo wrote:VALE PARK wrote:Did his grandson play cricket for Pakistan?
Kublai? No, he decreed a stately pleasuredome in Xanadu...
by Booney » Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:29 pm
bennymacca wrote:Jars said we were getting Al Clarkson to coach
by tipper » Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:03 pm
Magellan wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
That last line has a distinct "methinks she protests too much" air to it.
by stan » Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:05 pm
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:stan wrote:Mickyj wrote:[quote="Rising Power"]http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
Does make you wonder why a media station with a port Adelaide fan in its team brings up no reserves cause that means no port academy side
Not really the blokes an idiot.
MMM are all about spruking rumours, the best one was a runmour a few years back that Jars on MMM ran with in which it turned out the origns of it were via a deliberate troll on Big footy. So really anything coming from MMM is most likely speculation at best.
MMM are the bottom of the barrel when it comes to any sort of credibility in any form. Music and sport the two they have the least clue about.
by stan » Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:08 pm
tipper wrote:Magellan wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
That last line has a distinct "methinks she protests too much" air to it.
to me, it has a feel similar to the afl reserves issue way back when. there were various claims made back then that turned out to me no more than hot air...
"The AFL Reserves issue will not be addressed until the licences are sold."
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38794
by Trent Plucktrum » Thu Mar 10, 2016 9:08 pm
Magellan wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
That last line has a distinct "methinks she protests too much" air to it.
by therisingblues » Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:05 pm
Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
by Magellan » Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:02 am
therisingblues wrote:Rising Power wrote:http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/3361/
SANFL STATEMENT - RESERVES
The SANFL notes recent media speculation about the future of its reserves competition.
The speculation is inaccurate and unfounded.
We wish to make it clear that no change is being considered or anticipated with regard to our reserves competition.
No further comment will be made on this matter.
"Now go sit in the corner and have a good think about what you did!!!"
by VALE PARK » Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:30 pm
by VALE PARK » Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:31 pm
by Reddeer » Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:25 pm
VALE PARK wrote:I hope everyone will pass on to their supporters and mates in all the clubs this discussion topic.
If it does get proposed by the SANFL, thinking rank and file members will rally to the cause.
Don't touch our league and destroy our clubs culture.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |