Page 5 of 5

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 4:38 pm
by Spargo
The above post has appeared in two other threads also - WTF?
Edit - well it was there briefly :lol:

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 4:40 pm
by am Bays
dedja wrote:countdown to account removal ... 10, 9, 8, 7, 6 ...


Bloody North supporters....

Look at the Bays supporters posting in numbers!!

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 8:50 pm
by kickinit
Pseudo wrote:
kickinit wrote:
on the rails wrote:In any case the whole comp is compromised and will eventually lie down and die under the suffocation and bullying of the AFL. Those 6 Presidents and their supporting CEO's will be remembered for only that in years to come but only if people can be bothered to remember!


I don't get how you can say the afl has bullied the sanfl. They asked for what they wanted and the sanfl clubs gave it to them. Like I said port second proposal didn't change a lot from the first. 7 of the 8 clubs were asked what they wanted changed and in result it was 7-1 vote for yes.


Standover tactics like threatening to deny coin and media exposure, and threatening to join the ammos should be rightly regarded as bullying.


You do realise that at this time the SANFL owned both the AFL teams. I;d still like to know what coin they were going to deny, how they were going to deny media exposure. So what if they joined the ammo's what difference would it make to the sanfl clubs if they did.

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 9:35 pm
by Spargo
F#ck me, you just don't get it.

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 6:32 am
by kickinit
Spargo wrote:F#ck me, you just don't get it.


Yeh I do get it, the sanfl clubs voted yes and now they have to deal with it. It is their fault and no one else.

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 6:59 am
by stan
kickinit wrote:
Spargo wrote:F#ck me, you just don't get it.


Yeh I do get it, the sanfl clubs voted yes and now they have to deal with it. It is their fault and no one else.

I said this some time ago that the clubs voted yes. Regardless of the shit **** spin crap from Trigg or whoever the clubs needed to do there own checks. Now we are stuck with this. We the fans may not have voted for it but our clubs did.

Thats a point that can't be argued. However whether its good for the comp can be and will be regardless.

Re: Glenelg FC

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:11 am
by Jim05
kickinit wrote:
Spargo wrote:F#ck me, you just don't get it.


Yeh I do get it, the sanfl clubs voted yes and now they have to deal with it. It is their fault and no one else.

The AFL have bullied the SANFL plenty.
Threatened to withdraw some grass roots funding if the SANFL GF wasnt moved forward so the AFL GF can be the finale.