Jimmy_041 wrote:Real question: Does Adelaide include the casino?
you would think so Jimmy based on those figures .
by the wonder elephant » Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:59 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Real question: Does Adelaide include the casino?
by StrayDog » Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:20 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Real question: Does Adelaide include the casino?
by StrayDog » Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:40 am
therisingblues wrote:It would be interesting to see city of Unley pokies revenue per capita vs other areas though.
by Wedgie » Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:35 am
by therisingblues » Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:34 pm
StrayDog wrote:therisingblues wrote:It would be interesting to see city of Unley pokies revenue per capita vs other areas though.
Again, sorry for the delay.
It's a bit deceptive but the Unley calculations were there, you might have just needed to scroll down inside the "code" panel / window.
I can't recall needing to do that in the old site format. (?)
by finals fever » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:13 am
by csbowes » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:26 am
by Big Phil » Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:54 am
csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
by therisingblues » Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:48 am
csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
The memorabilia scandal being an example of a screw up, as it turns out nothing was stolen.
by Bounce of the ball » Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:57 pm
Big Phil wrote:csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
Yes - very much jumped, before he was pushed...
by Big Phil » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:03 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:Big Phil wrote:csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
Yes - very much jumped, before he was pushed...
How do you know Phil ?
by Bounce of the ball » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:35 pm
by csbowes » Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:01 am
therisingblues wrote:csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
The memorabilia scandal being an example of a screw up, as it turns out nothing was stolen.
Screw up by who? Or are you inferring it turned out to be a non-screw up?
by Barto » Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:50 pm
csbowes wrote:therisingblues wrote:csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
The memorabilia scandal being an example of a screw up, as it turns out nothing was stolen.
Screw up by who? Or are you inferring it turned out to be a non-screw up?
Nothing was stolen, stuff was just in a cupboard somewhere.
Club is being threatened with a law suit for defamation by the wrongly accused.
That's my understanding.
by The analyst » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:43 pm
by csbowes » Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:11 pm
The analyst wrote:Any suggestion that Matt Benson was forced out by Sturt is utter rubbish, Maybe those inferring anything other than this should deal in facts over fiction.
by The analyst » Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:03 pm
csbowes wrote:The analyst wrote:Any suggestion that Matt Benson was forced out by Sturt is utter rubbish, Maybe those inferring anything other than this should deal in facts over fiction.
My information comes from three sources and I know which board member led the charge...
So I have faith in what I've been told.
Unfortunately its not likely the full story will ever be publicised.
by therisingblues » Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:09 pm
csbowes wrote:therisingblues wrote:csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
The memorabilia scandal being an example of a screw up, as it turns out nothing was stolen.
Screw up by who? Or are you inferring it turned out to be a non-screw up?
Nothing was stolen, stuff was just in a cupboard somewhere.
Club is being threatened with a law suit for defamation by the wrongly accused.
That's my understanding.
by therisingblues » Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:12 pm
Barto wrote:csbowes wrote:therisingblues wrote:csbowes wrote:My info is he was forced out of Sturt by the board.
The memorabilia scandal being an example of a screw up, as it turns out nothing was stolen.
Screw up by who? Or are you inferring it turned out to be a non-screw up?
Nothing was stolen, stuff was just in a cupboard somewhere.
Club is being threatened with a law suit for defamation by the wrongly accused.
That's my understanding.
The wrongly accused is owed a public apology IMO.
by csbowes » Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:38 am
The analyst wrote:csbowes wrote:The analyst wrote:Any suggestion that Matt Benson was forced out by Sturt is utter rubbish, Maybe those inferring anything other than this should deal in facts over fiction.
My information comes from three sources and I know which board member led the charge...
So I have faith in what I've been told.
Unfortunately its not likely the full story will ever be publicised.
Well, and not for the first time on this forum, CS Bowes you are emphatically wrong.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |