SA Footy

Panther host the Dogs at Noarlunga...

Both coming off a good win...

Radio - 1197am RPH Adelaide from 1:30pm

Broke the Elizabeth hoodoo earlier in the season, now need to end the Noarlunga one (last win 2006 v Dogs at the ground).

Important game to keep in order to keep in touch with the top 3 while also protecting our spot in the 5, given North and Norwood are likely to win this week.

Integrity cup round 2.

We Need a good match up to stop Eddy. Hopefully Stephenson can comeback this week.

Go U Dogs.

UK Fan wrote:Integrity cup round 2.

We Need a good match up to stop Eddy. Hopefully Stephenson can comeback this week.

Go U Dogs.

should go in the things that make me laugh thread but seriously if the doggies win then they are definitely back in the hunt

The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

RB wrote:The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

RB wrote:The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

wah wah

woodublieve12 wrote:

RB wrote:The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

wah wah

Curious as to who you support in the SANFL woodublieve? Why do come into the SANFL forum? (serious questions)

saintal wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

RB wrote:The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

wah wah

Curious as to who you support in the SANFL woodublieve? Why do come into the SANFL forum? (serious questions)

bays from pretty much birth. But since i moved to noarlunga 2 years ago i've got a very big soft spot for the panthers to a point were i reckon i'll start following them. But i'm not a die hard supporter... I am when it comes to the swans.. Myself and my kids are members.

I come on here like everyone else... For a good read but like some in recent time are getting frustrated by the ongoing carry on....

This is a south vs central forum not a whinge thread about integrity!!!

woodublieve12 wrote:

saintal wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

RB wrote:The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

wah wah

Curious as to who you support in the SANFL woodublieve? Why do come into the SANFL forum? (serious questions)

bays from pretty much birth. But since i moved to noarlunga 2 years ago i've got a very big soft spot for the panthers to a point were i reckon i'll start following them. But i'm not a die hard supporter... I am when it comes to the swans.. Myself and my kids are members.

I come on here like everyone else... For a good read but like some in recent time are getting frustrated by the ongoing carry on....

This is a south vs central forum not a whinge thread about integrity!!!

Yet you chose to make your "wah wah" post instead of contributing anything at all to the South v Dogs discussion

woodublieve12 wrote:

saintal wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

RB wrote:The fact that you don't understand what integrity means will surprise very few.

wah wah

Curious as to who you support in the SANFL woodublieve? Why do come into the SANFL forum? (serious questions)

bays from pretty much birth. But since i moved to noarlunga 2 years ago i've got a very big soft spot for the panthers to a point were i reckon i'll start following them. But i'm not a die hard supporter... I am when it comes to the swans.. Myself and my kids are members.

I come on here like everyone else... For a good read but like some in recent time are getting frustrated by the ongoing carry on....

This is a south vs central forum not a whinge thread about integrity!!!

Ok, cheers.

It's hard to describe the change in fortune of these two sides n such a short space of time. Only a couple of years ago no one would have given South a hope, but this week I suspect they start as favourites.

You kind of keep waiting for the South bubble to burst and Centrals have that uncanny knack of pulling something out of nowhere so I'm going for a Bulldog victory.
Centrals by less than 10 points

johntheclaret wrote:Yet you chose to make your "wah wah" post instead of contributing anything at all to the South v Dogs discussion

yep. Why is ok that people continually bring in there own agenda to a pre match and post match forums which is not about the game??
Probably the wah wah call was a bit out of line, i apologise. But there is a whole thread to that issue and i would guess people come to these forums to chat about the game... hearing the same thing over and over again is pretty tiresome...

UKF mentioned it was the Integrity Cup, part 2 - a name for this game adopted by many who care about the comp.
The fact someone chose to troll about that is not the fault of us who have been anti AFL reserves.

woodublieve12 wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:Yet you chose to make your "wah wah" post instead of contributing anything at all to the South v Dogs discussion

yep. Why is ok that people continually bring in there own agenda to a pre match and post match forums which is not about the game??
Probably the wah wah call was a bit out of line, i apologise. But there is a whole thread to that issue and i would guess people come to these forums to chat about the game... hearing the same thing over and over again is pretty tiresome...

So who do you think will win and why?

That was interesting too, that you've been a Bays fan since birth but are leaning towards changing your allegiance to South. Personally I couldn't do that but is it because of location or dissolution with Glenelg.

johntheclaret wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:Yet you chose to make your "wah wah" post instead of contributing anything at all to the South v Dogs discussion

yep. Why is ok that people continually bring in there own agenda to a pre match and post match forums which is not about the game??
Probably the wah wah call was a bit out of line, i apologise. But there is a whole thread to that issue and i would guess people come to these forums to chat about the game... hearing the same thing over and over again is pretty tiresome...

So who do you think will win and why?

That was interesting too, that you've been a Bays fan since birth but are leaning towards changing your allegiance to South. Personally I couldn't do that but is it because of location or dissolution with Glenelg.

more so location.

South should win comfortably, 38pts
Love the way south have been playing this year.. I know they are only 4th but massive improvement... Centrals not up to it imho. And i can't see anyone stopping Eddy up forward...

Woodublieve12, we Southies welcome you and your family with open arms, the club is currently offering a great value 3 game membership, go to our web-site for details. The club is in dire need for more members particularly from those who reside down south, so please come along to the games, speak to the club about membership and you can be assured the club is family and community focused.

Go Panthers...

Sadly, I will be missing this game - but listening on RPH (with a secretive earplug in one ear, whilst officiating @ a Swim Meet @ Marion Pool).
Important game for South - win & consolidate spot in the 5, lose & back in the pack for 4th & 5th.
Traditionally, these are the games that SAFC supporters have been let down - so hope this is a 'new day' for them & South get the points.

South by 21 pts.

woodublieve12 wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:Yet you chose to make your "wah wah" post instead of contributing anything at all to the South v Dogs discussion

yep. Why is ok that people continually bring in there own agenda to a pre match and post match forums which is not about the game??
Probably the wah wah call was a bit out of line, i apologise. But there is a whole thread to that issue and i would guess people come to these forums to chat about the game... hearing the same thing over and over again is pretty tiresome...

That's a fair point. Should have made it in the first place instead of trolling.

Dogwatcher wrote:UKF mentioned it was the Integrity Cup, part 2 - a name for this game adopted by many who care about the comp.
The fact someone chose to troll about that is not the fault of us who have been anti AFL reserves.

Thank you. UKF's post was about the game anyway.