SA Footy

Is there any way that the clubs can enforce a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the present group of Clowns
There must be a way of ridding the competition of the current Presentante?????(if you could call him/it that) as the situation has turned to Sh*t

Another brilliant idea by the management. Stop the 18 competition for a fortnight mid season?? So much for the centre of excellence..

They seem to be more concerned with kissing people's arses, some in the hope it will lead to a job with those they colluded with ( for instance a bald 'gentleman' now in a senior role at one of the SA AFL clubs).

Maybe install somebody who doesn't so obviously hate the SANFL would be good...

vics01 wrote:Another brilliant idea by the management. Stop the 18 competition for a fortnight mid season?? So much for the centre of excellence..

Actually it's not a bad plan, best U/18s are playing in Victoria with the State U/18s, College footy is still going (and learning sh!t habits) and it allows the other boys to play local and qualify for finals where appropriate.

Given they have played 2 games already what difference is it going to make to the comp. if State are playing?? 2 weeks away from a high standard, a very good example of the stupidity at the top level of SANFL at present. PS that useless college system is running in anycase

Reddeer wrote:Is there any way that the clubs can enforce a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the present group of Clowns
There must be a way of ridding the competition of the current Presentante?????(if you could call him/it that) as the situation has turned to Sh*t

So you expect the same gutless spineless people who voted YES to the afl sides in the SANFL now to grow some balls and vote No Confidence and take charge of the comp.

For some strange reason I don't think it's going to happen

Prior to the advent of the 2 AFL licenses the sanfl was run by the league delegates-ie reps from each member club. When the licenses were introduced the sanfl introduced the sanfl commission, whose sole role was governance and the maintaining of the licenses.
Now the sanfl has divested itself of the afl licenses shouldnt the Commission also be disbanded and leave the running of the sanfl to the League delegates??? It seems to the casual observer that the Commission now runs the show and the League delegates have very little imput into the running of the league.

Spot on blueandwhite and I don't think the current SANFL Commission will want to give up their positions and the perks that go with it!

This is what happen at Norwood on Sunday the Crows wanted the coaches box at 3/4 time of the reserves West v Norwood, then they wanted Wests Statisticians bench at 1/2 time of the reserves, then the reserves had to sit outside for 30 minutes after the game while the Crows warm up. And to top it up they blew the siren under directions of the SANFL with 3 minutes to go West trailing by 11 points and still in it, so it gave the Crows reserves more time to warm up. The sooner they are out of the SANFL the better.

blueandwhite wrote:Prior to the advent of the 2 AFL licenses the sanfl was run by the league delegates-ie reps from each member club. When the licenses were introduced the sanfl introduced the sanfl commission, whose sole role was governance and the maintaining of the licenses.
Now the sanfl has divested itself of the afl licenses shouldnt the Commission also be disbanded and leave the running of the sanfl to the League delegates??? It seems to the casual observer that the Commission now runs the show and the League delegates have very little imput into the running of the league.

Couldn't agree with you more, it's time the commission goes they continually do what isn't in the best interest of the league!!!

Thiele wrote:This is what happen at Norwood on Sunday the Crows wanted the coaches box at 3/4 time of the reserves West v Norwood, then they wanted Wests Statisticians bench at 1/2 time of the reserves, then the reserves had to sit outside for 30 minutes after the game while the Crows warm up. And to top it up they blew the siren under directions of the SANFL with 3 minutes to go West trailing by 11 points and still in it, so it gave the Crows reserves more time to warm up. The sooner they are out of the SANFL the better.

Have the league been asked for a comment on this? It is an absolute disgrace, and I would like to hear somebody try to defend it.

RB wrote:

Thiele wrote:This is what happen at Norwood on Sunday the Crows wanted the coaches box at 3/4 time of the reserves West v Norwood, then they wanted Wests Statisticians bench at 1/2 time of the reserves, then the reserves had to sit outside for 30 minutes after the game while the Crows warm up. And to top it up they blew the siren under directions of the SANFL with 3 minutes to go West trailing by 11 points and still in it, so it gave the Crows reserves more time to warm up. The sooner they are out of the SANFL the better.

Have the league been asked for a comment on this? It is an absolute disgrace, and I would like to hear somebody try to defend it.

West have sent an email to the SANFL

West should of just told them to **** off.

Jim05 wrote:West should of just told them to **** off.

its what they would have done to any other club if they were stupid enough to try it. wonder why they treated the ravens differently?

Jim05 wrote:West should of just told them to **** off.

we did and they did there set up after the reserves. Wonder how the bay u/18s got treated they played after the league on Sunday