Page 7 of 11

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 1:28 pm
by LaughingKookaburra
Eddies clutching @ straws when he says it effects the result @ a pivotal point of the match. He has no proof that it would.

If I wanted to be a smartarse to the bloke I could argue that there should be a sin bin in AFL for malicious acts on a footy field like when Cloke king hit Tyson Edwards in a prelim final. That was pivotal as he was killing them and the Crows were taking it up to them @ a cruical time.
He then invites the thug and his old man on the footy show to plead his case to play in a gf.

By the way if that incident didn't occur I have no doubt the result would have been the same, its just the way footy goes.

Suck it up butter cup.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 1:45 pm
by stan
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Eddies clutching @ straws when he says it effects the result @ a pivotal point of the match. He has no proof that it would.

If I wanted to be a smartarse to the bloke I could argue that there should be a sin bin in AFL for malicious acts on a footy field like when Cloke king hit Tyson Edwards in a prelim final. That was pivotal as he was killing them and the Crows were taking it up to them @ a cruical time.
He then invites the thug and his old man on the footy show to plead his case to play in a gf.

By the way if that incident didn't occur I have no doubt the result would have been the same, its just the way footy goes.

Suck it up butter cup.


Suck it up is correct. The umpire in control called all clear, the game stops when he calls time I'm pretty sure. But would it of effected the out come? Who knows really thats not something that can be answered. Although the Score would have been 58 - 50 at 3 1/4 time. But the crows had so much more run and Collingwood looked flat. I think its just Eddie being Eddie again.

Just on the Cloke King hit, well no it was actually in the marking contest and not a off the ball king hit on Tyson. Yes it was a cheap shot, but he deserved his games and missed that GF and I can recall hearing from him too much after that.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 1:52 pm
by LaughingKookaburra
I know mate I'm more making the point that he makes noise @ times just to suit him.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 4:36 pm
by stan
LaughingKookaburra wrote:I know mate I'm more making the point that he makes noise @ times just to suit him.


Well yeah he does thats a given.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 5:19 pm
by Booney
And 16 clubs wish they had an Eddie as their front man, except for Port. We've got Kochie :lol:

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 5:42 pm
by JK
bennymacca wrote:Big difference was we were actually switched on from the start this week.

Also please feel free to bet against the crows whenever you like. :)


Backed their reserves tonight, hope the trend continues :D

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 6:02 pm
by bennymacca
AO siren is 105dB, a full 10dB higher than the AFL min requirement of 95dB.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-05-16/sirengate-mark-ii

for those that dont know, 10dB is roughly 10 times more power put into the siren (though we dont hear it as being 10 times louder because our ears also hear in the logarithmic scale)

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 7:21 pm
by LaughingKookaburra
**** id like to hear what the Subiaco siren is. My games attended there I've almost had my head blown off by the siren.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 7:55 pm
by dedja
zing ball, you know it makes sense ...

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 8:50 pm
by dedja
The Swans demolishing the Bombers ... triple figure spanking beckons.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:07 pm
by Q.
Confirmed tonight that umps are made of porcelain.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:22 pm
by Q.
And are blind.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:24 pm
by Jase
Not having the best of nights are they....

Sent from my XT925 using Tapatalk

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 10:58 pm
by valleys07
Given the budgets latest introduction- I hope that poor umpire has $7 on his person...

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2014 11:52 pm
by woodublieve12
If Hannebery gets games it will be worse then the Viney decision... Had hands on footy when made contact... Malceski should get nothing too

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 12:13 am
by dedja
Agreed, classic side on approach to protect himself which every kid gets taught in under 9s.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 1:07 am
by LaughingKookaburra
dedja wrote:zing ball, you know it makes sense ...


Still reckon the led advertising screens on the boundary flashing is a great way. You can then see @ eye level the exact time it goes off and not have to look up @ the screen.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 1:11 am
by LaughingKookaburra
dedja wrote:Can also use it to check if a goal has been touched.


What if it hails and the ball looks like a portable disco ball ;)

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 1:37 am
by saintal
woodublieve12 wrote:If Hannebery gets games it will be worse then the Viney decision... Had hands on footy when made contact...


Two blokes both going in low for the footy at the same time, one was better protected than the other. Nothing in it at all.

Re: AFL Round 9 Discussion

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2014 4:49 pm
by Jim05
Sucked in Richmond you bunch of flogs