by UK Fan » Fri Feb 25, 2022 1:05 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by whufc » Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:13 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:23 pm
UK Fan wrote:It Looks like lions have piled it on.
88 point smacking of crows.
Rachelle looked good for the crows. Ben Davis appears to have been given Kelly’s role down back.
by Armchair expert » Fri Feb 25, 2022 3:06 pm
by MW » Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:46 pm
Armchair expert wrote:#NoDawsonNoCrows
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 25, 2022 7:54 pm
MW wrote:Armchair expert wrote:#NoDawsonNoCrows
Trolling both port and crows after a trial match... gonna be a long year for you mate
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by MW » Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:19 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:41 pm
MW wrote:If you think gods waiting room will be immune to criticism good luck
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by stan » Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:27 am
Oh my UK fan is back, how where the days you spent away?UK Fan wrote:It Looks like lions have piled it on.
88 point smacking of crows.
Rachelle looked good for the crows. Ben Davis appears to have been given Kelly’s role down back.
by UK Fan » Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:11 am
stan wrote:Oh my UK fan is back, how where the days you spent away?UK Fan wrote:It Looks like lions have piled it on.
88 point smacking of crows.
Rachelle looked good for the crows. Ben Davis appears to have been given Kelly’s role down back.
Hope you had a good time. Crowd estimates haven't been accurate since you have been gone.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by stan » Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:32 pm
Good to have you back. We have missed you in the Covid19 thread.UK Fan wrote:stan wrote:Oh my UK fan is back, how where the days you spent away?UK Fan wrote:It Looks like lions have piled it on.
88 point smacking of crows.
Rachelle looked good for the crows. Ben Davis appears to have been given Kelly’s role down back.
Hope you had a good time. Crowd estimates haven't been accurate since you have been gone.
What crowds ??
by whufc » Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:48 am
by Booney » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:01 am
whufc wrote:Sounds like the Crows camp saga will just not go away.
Apparently Eddie Betts biography has now been delayed on the back of the recent media retraction. Allegedly this has irritated Betts and his book will now expose some further truths which he was going to avoid telling.
Is this true or not who knows but one thing is for sure he has a decent publicist using the situation to generate further interest in the book.
by amber_fluid » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:05 am
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Sounds like the Crows camp saga will just not go away.
Apparently Eddie Betts biography has now been delayed on the back of the recent media retraction. Allegedly this has irritated Betts and his book will now expose some further truths which he was going to avoid telling.
Is this true or not who knows but one thing is for sure he has a decent publicist using the situation to generate further interest in the book.
Simple arithmetic tells us Betts told McClure, McClure told the world, McClure has egg on his face = nobody believes him > Betts.
If Betts is unhappy the Age / 9 retracted some comments he's clearly the source and I can't wait to read his book.
by whufc » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:08 am
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Sounds like the Crows camp saga will just not go away.
Apparently Eddie Betts biography has now been delayed on the back of the recent media retraction. Allegedly this has irritated Betts and his book will now expose some further truths which he was going to avoid telling.
Is this true or not who knows but one thing is for sure he has a decent publicist using the situation to generate further interest in the book.
Simple arithmetic tells us Betts told McClure, McClure told the world, McClure has egg on his face = nobody believes him > Betts.
If Betts is unhappy the Age / 9 retracted some comments he's clearly the source and I can't wait to read his book.
by MW » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:14 am
by amber_fluid » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:19 am
MW wrote:What could betts say that would make it worse?
He'll say he was offended by the inappropriate use of the aboriginal artifact, and the questions around confidential personal information the organisers used on them.
If you think he's going to confirm all your wild fantasies about tied naked to trees etc then you'll be reading a book for no reason.
by amber_fluid » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:20 am
whufc wrote:Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Sounds like the Crows camp saga will just not go away.
Apparently Eddie Betts biography has now been delayed on the back of the recent media retraction. Allegedly this has irritated Betts and his book will now expose some further truths which he was going to avoid telling.
Is this true or not who knows but one thing is for sure he has a decent publicist using the situation to generate further interest in the book.
Simple arithmetic tells us Betts told McClure, McClure told the world, McClure has egg on his face = nobody believes him > Betts.
If Betts is unhappy the Age / 9 retracted some comments he's clearly the source and I can't wait to read his book.
The other somewhat interesting part is I believe the original author was Ali Clarke (Matt Clarkes wifes)
Since the delay and additions to book she will be not the author anymore...……...….
by whufc » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:20 am
MW wrote:What could betts say that would make it worse?
He'll say he was offended by the inappropriate use of the aboriginal artifact, and the questions around confidential personal information the organisers used on them.
If you think he's going to confirm all your wild fantasies about tied naked to trees etc then you'll be reading a book for no reason.
by whufc » Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:21 am
amber_fluid wrote:whufc wrote:Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Sounds like the Crows camp saga will just not go away.
Apparently Eddie Betts biography has now been delayed on the back of the recent media retraction. Allegedly this has irritated Betts and his book will now expose some further truths which he was going to avoid telling.
Is this true or not who knows but one thing is for sure he has a decent publicist using the situation to generate further interest in the book.
Simple arithmetic tells us Betts told McClure, McClure told the world, McClure has egg on his face = nobody believes him > Betts.
If Betts is unhappy the Age / 9 retracted some comments he's clearly the source and I can't wait to read his book.
The other somewhat interesting part is I believe the original author was Ali Clarke (Matt Clarkes wifes)
Since the delay and additions to book she will be not the author anymore...……...….
She obviously wouldn’t publish what he wanted so he went elsewhere
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |