SA Footy

Q. wrote:Gooooooooooooodbye. That's at least a two-year ban.

It might well be, in two years when we find out.

Booney wrote:

Q. wrote:Gooooooooooooodbye. That's at least a two-year ban.

It might well be, in two years when we find out.

The Essendon druggies will get away with it cos they didnt test positive. These two who needed to meet a skin fold test wont!

Surely Eddie will blame this on the Swans somehow???

Q. wrote:Gooooooooooooodbye. That's at least a two-year ban.

I think it's up to 2 year ban rather than at least 2 years...I could be wrong though
either way, their careers are over

am Bays wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:Collingwood Football Club players Lachy Keeffe and Josh Thomas have reportedly tested positive to a performance enhancing drug.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/afl/afl-news/collingwood-footballers-lachlan-keeffe-and-josh-thomas-face-positive-drug-test-20150330-1maznj.html

AFL (Patrick Keane) reporting that the substance is Clenbuterol on MMM footy site

Poor blokes have just eaten some of Alberto Contador's left over Clenbuterol enhanced Steak.

nothing to see here, move along....

Any restaurants around the Lexus Centre serve steaks imported from China???
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/apr/23/michael-rogers-uci-contaminated-meat

woodublieve12 wrote:Surely Eddie will blame this on the Swans somehow???

the afl related simpsons quote guys have come up with a couple of beauty's already

https://www.facebook.com/AFLSimpsons?fref=nf

Q. wrote:Gooooooooooooodbye. That's at least a two-year ban.

Could be 4 years, AFL adopted the new WADA code on Jan 1, players tested positive in Feb so the new longer ban would take effect.
Also with 2 players done it could mean team sanctions.

Both players are denying they knowingly took it.

Q. wrote:Both players are denying they knowingly took it.

Means nothing. Saad didnt know he was ingesting a banned substance.

HH3 wrote:

Q. wrote:Both players are denying they knowingly took it.

Means nothing. Saad didnt know he was ingesting a banned substance.

Because they don't do hair follicle testing, which would determince accidental dosing or systematic dosing, then the outcome of Clenbuterol cases is determined by your ability to argue that the positive test was a result of contamination. I don't think there's been many, if any, successful arguments over the years though.

There was that one case in Mexico. lol

So what happens if they are innocent and the b sample proves this? Can the club make any sort of claim for being ineligible to play to players, and what about the players can they put in a claim for loss of income and they won't be gaining match payments?

Dogwatcher wrote:There was that one case in Mexico. lol

Over 100 cases wasnt it?
Pretty sure in the u17 Soccer World Cup in Mexico there was over 100 players who tested positive

Rumour that there might be more positive tests to come involving players from other clubs!

Q. wrote:Rumour that there might be more positive tests to come involving players from other clubs!

Where did you hear this?

Coach Bombay wrote:

Q. wrote:Rumour that there might be more positive tests to come involving players from other clubs!

Where did you hear this?

Ricky Nixon's twitter feed

Q. wrote:Rumour that there might be more positive tests to come involving players from other clubs!

Has been a rumour for a couple of days.

Q. wrote:Rumour that there might be more positive tests to come involving players from other clubs!

No surprise at all.

Dont think these guys were deliberately cheating. More likely they popped a couple of googs that was cut with the stuff

Jim05 wrote:Dont think these guys were deliberately cheating. More likely they popped a couple of googs that was cut with the stuff

Nobody would cut rec drugs with Clen