by Hefty » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:30 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:31 pm
HH3 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:HH3 wrote: I bring Adelaide into it, because thats what most people are whinging about. Take Adelaide out of the equation then tell me who gives a f**k. Nobody.
Melbourne media are saying they hope karma hits NM hard. Its called player management.
That's a bit contradictory. It's only Adelaide whingeing, but Melbourne media calling for the Karma bus.
They're crying "poor Adelaide".
by Brodlach » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:34 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by HH3 » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:40 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:HH3 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:HH3 wrote: I bring Adelaide into it, because thats what most people are whinging about. Take Adelaide out of the equation then tell me who gives a f**k. Nobody.
Melbourne media are saying they hope karma hits NM hard. Its called player management.
That's a bit contradictory. It's only Adelaide whingeing, but Melbourne media calling for the Karma bus.
They're crying "poor Adelaide".
So you think Melbourne media are sticking up for Adelaide?
by Booney » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:48 pm
Brodlach wrote:Wonder if all this could work into a Kangaroo victory got 10 blokes busting their asses to play finals next week and Richmond thinking they just need to turn up to win, we all know how mentally fragile Richmond are.
Don't think it's a good look for footy but the whinging is over the top, got to play and win next week, it's finals
by whufc » Fri Sep 04, 2015 4:33 pm
by Booney » Fri Sep 04, 2015 4:44 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 04, 2015 4:51 pm
Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
by Booney » Fri Sep 04, 2015 4:51 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
Hard to argue with your logic.
If you think there's an integrity issue in this situation, then conversely there's one in the SANFL?
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 04, 2015 4:54 pm
by whufc » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:03 pm
Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:05 pm
whufc wrote:Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
I was just how in my opinion i could see why Scott would want to rest players and why he thinks this would be beneficial for his side come finals.
by Booney » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:06 pm
whufc wrote:Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
I was just how in my opinion i could see why Scott would want to rest players and why he thinks this would be beneficial for his side come finals.
by whufc » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:12 pm
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
I was just how in my opinion i could see why Scott would want to rest players and why he thinks this would be beneficial for his side come finals.
Of course it is. It's just broken the exact rule the AFL put in place to avoid this. That's all.
by whufc » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:14 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:whufc wrote:Booney wrote:It's actually nothing to do with Adelaide.
Why people have brought them into it, I don't know.
Funny though, 632,409 topics and 1.6m hits on integrity in the SANFL forum.....lol's in here.
Of course, spud grade hard wicket is very comparable to AFL.
I was just how in my opinion i could see why Scott would want to rest players and why he thinks this would be beneficial for his side come finals.
I'm not sure you're analogy's quite right, though, Whuffa. Scott's not playing Firrito at FF and swing Ben Brown to FB.
by HH3 » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:17 pm
by bennymacca » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:23 pm
by whufc » Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:25 pm
bennymacca wrote:If that was actually the case you would rest them all through the season rather than all at once at the end.
Its not North's fault, its the fact that the AFL put in a rule to prevent exactly this scenario, and then still signed off on it when it comes up
by daysofourlives » Fri Sep 04, 2015 7:56 pm
by HH3 » Fri Sep 04, 2015 8:39 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |