by cracka » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:13 pm
by carey » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:24 pm
cracka wrote:Wasn't it pissing down with rain when Collingwood & Port played. Would've kept some away.
by amber_fluid » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:32 pm
tipper wrote:Booney wrote:Off track, but how would it be counted or recorded? ( As with Port winning one )
with a big ******* asterix next to it
by cracka » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:33 pm
carey wrote:cracka wrote:Wasn't it pissing down with rain when Collingwood & Port played. Would've kept some away.
Cracka, please don't use common sense on here, it has no place.
It wouldn't matter what Port did, they could brake attendance records and the same couple on here will find away to slip one in to Port.
They know who they are.
by carey » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:41 pm
by Spargo » Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:12 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Tom Lynch got a fine!!! Disgrace! Just punches a bloke... How did he not get a game?
by JK » Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:16 pm
carey wrote:I'm realistic mate I think we take Richmonds spot and just miss. Your mob to push top 4 for mine.
Whilst we've played 2 reasonable games, facts are Melbourne didn't rock up and Collingwood had a very average side in. With this being said you can only play the opposition that rocks up. Dogs a huge test this week.
Hope I'm wrong but the 8 is set for mine. Unless Dogs get more injuries or the Eagles start losing at home the rest look safe to me.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:58 pm
Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tom Lynch got a fine!!! Disgrace! Just punches a bloke... How did he not get a game?
Precedent has been set earlier in the season with blokes getting only fined for the same thing. Having said that, Laidler's reaction was pretty weak.
Good to see the AFL looking after their golden boys by not even siting Joel Selwood for bumping Phil Davis in the head - it looked pretty deliberate. But one of their other favourites in Luke Parker wasn't called to account for his similar "effort" v Richmond a few weeks back so we shouldn't be surprised.
by Spargo » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:05 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tom Lynch got a fine!!! Disgrace! Just punches a bloke... How did he not get a game?
Precedent has been set earlier in the season with blokes getting only fined for the same thing. Having said that, Laidler's reaction was pretty weak.
Good to see the AFL looking after their golden boys by not even siting Joel Selwood for bumping Phil Davis in the head - it looked pretty deliberate. But one of their other favourites in Luke Parker wasn't called to account for his similar "effort" v Richmond a few weeks back so we shouldn't be surprised.
Poor bloody North. Top of the ladder playing an 'away' game at your own deck and you're spewing because only one Cat was rubbed out for bullshit.
regards,
REB
by woodublieve12 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:27 pm
Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tom Lynch got a fine!!! Disgrace! Just punches a bloke... How did he not get a game?
Precedent has been set earlier in the season with blokes getting only fined for the same thing. Having said that, Laidler's reaction was pretty weak.
Good to see the AFL looking after their golden boys by not even siting Joel Selwood for bumping Phil Davis in the head - it looked pretty deliberate. But one of their other favourites in Luke Parker wasn't called to account for his similar "effort" v Richmond a few weeks back so we shouldn't be surprised.
by Spargo » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:39 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tom Lynch got a fine!!! Disgrace! Just punches a bloke... How did he not get a game?
Precedent has been set earlier in the season with blokes getting only fined for the same thing. Having said that, Laidler's reaction was pretty weak.
Good to see the AFL looking after their golden boys by not even siting Joel Selwood for bumping Phil Davis in the head - it looked pretty deliberate. But one of their other favourites in Luke Parker wasn't called to account for his similar "effort" v Richmond a few weeks back so we shouldn't be surprised.
Laidler weak? You sure? Punched straight up in the ribs, and it wasn't one of those piss weak love taps
by woodublieve12 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:46 pm
Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tom Lynch got a fine!!! Disgrace! Just punches a bloke... How did he not get a game?
Precedent has been set earlier in the season with blokes getting only fined for the same thing. Having said that, Laidler's reaction was pretty weak.
Good to see the AFL looking after their golden boys by not even siting Joel Selwood for bumping Phil Davis in the head - it looked pretty deliberate. But one of their other favourites in Luke Parker wasn't called to account for his similar "effort" v Richmond a few weeks back so we shouldn't be surprised.
Laidler weak? You sure? Punched straight up in the ribs, and it wasn't one of those piss weak love taps
He stands his ground in contests, backs into packs keeping his feet, yet went down this time faster than a Balinese hooker.
by Spargo » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:02 pm
by helicopterking » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:29 pm
by woodublieve12 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:32 pm
by Q. » Tue Jun 07, 2016 12:13 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Wedgie wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:I understand some points. But in business if your income has risen 25% in a key category at its peak and then within 5 years has dropped back to the base it started at (or below it) then around the boardroom there are knives flying and heads roll. Andy D found that out.
They wouldn't be concerned at all, they wouldn't be stupid enough to compare a premiership year when they played better supported teams prior to the league expanding and crowds dropping across the board to this year. Even if they did it is better than expected.
They would have been stoked getting the third highest average home crowds of all time prior to the Power game. Things like the Powers lack of excitement factor is out of their hands.
I envy Collingwoods figures, they're to be commended. They're world class.
I reckon some of Eddies comments recently show there are some very large concerns internally Wedgie. He's a very good operator and for him to come out and question himself in media situations shows he's rattled.
by helicopterking » Tue Jun 07, 2016 5:39 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Who was the west coast player who was very lucky to get off before a GF? Was that in 05 or 06? I think his name was Adam hunter
Not the swans fault they had a very good defence team...
by JK » Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:40 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Nothing wrong with dropping the boot in to Port Adelaide
I understand some points. But in business if your income has risen 25% in a key category at its peak and then within 5 years has dropped back to the base it started at (or below it) then around the boardroom there are knives flying and heads roll. Andy D found that out.
by Booney » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:05 am
by Wedgie » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:32 am
Booney wrote:Tom Hawkins 2 down to 1 for that?!?!?!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |