SA Footy

Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Bum Crack wrote:Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Don’t take any notice of the last 2 years fixture against us. You are playing better this year and we are battered and bruised. Will most likely have to make 3-4 changes this week


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jim05 wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Don’t take any notice of the last 2 years fixture against us. You are playing better this year and we are battered and bruised. Will most likely have to make 3-4 changes this week


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not buying into your reverse psychology

Bum Crack wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Don’t take any notice of the last 2 years fixture against us. You are playing better this year and we are battered and bruised. Will most likely have to make 3-4 changes this week


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not buying into your reverse psychology

You don’t think you are playing better?
Smith and Brown already going to miss with Heppell touch and go aswell.
Should get Fantasia back but will need 1-2 more to come up

Booney wrote:

Jase wrote:5 more seconds just 5 more fecking seconds

5 seconds? Playing the second half wouldn't hurt.

That was always going to happen. We couldn't keep getting clearances like we did. Kruez, Simpson and Newman getting injured hurt (pardon the pun). Gallant effort to fight back after being headed. That team last year would've lost by 6 goals.

Wedgie wrote:Was worried getting the hardest run of all teams to start 2019. Now we're through that period hopefully we can do ok whilst we're rebuilding.

My heart's bleeding.....

gadj1976 wrote:

Booney wrote:

Jase wrote:5 more seconds just 5 more fecking seconds

5 seconds? Playing the second half wouldn't hurt.

That was always going to happen. We couldn't keep getting clearances like we did. Kruez, Simpson and Newman getting injured hurt (pardon the pun). Gallant effort to fight back after being headed. That team last year would've lost by 6 goals.

The team last year wouldn't have been leading by 36 points at any stage either...

Things are certainly looking up...

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

gadj1976 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:Was worried getting the hardest run of all teams to start 2019. Now we're through that period hopefully we can do ok whilst we're rebuilding.

My heart's bleeding.....

As does mine to see Carlton still struggling 24 years after they cheated to win a flag.

Wedgie wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:Was worried getting the hardest run of all teams to start 2019. Now we're through that period hopefully we can do ok whilst we're rebuilding.

My heart's bleeding.....

As does mine to see Carlton still struggling 24 years after they cheated to win a flag.

You'd know all about that, the other club you barrack for that is

LMA wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:Was worried getting the hardest run of all teams to start 2019. Now we're through that period hopefully we can do ok whilst we're rebuilding.

My heart's bleeding.....

As does mine to see Carlton still struggling 24 years after they cheated to win a flag.

You'd know all about that, the other club you barrack for that is

It's different cheating to win a prelim.

PS Gadj and I have known each other for over 30 years in case the humour/sarcasm didn't come across.

That's unfortunate for him

LMA wrote:That's unfortunate for him

Absolutely!

Bum Crack wrote:Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Bloody Essendon. I've been saying the same thing. AMT kills us every time. We need to tick three things off before we loosen the lid

1. Essendon May headscratcher
2. The post bye slumber
3. The Chris Scott September shocker

2 and 3 in particular are bloody annoying as it has happened every year since we last one a flag.

regards,

REB

Jase wrote:

Booney wrote:

Jase wrote:5 more seconds just 5 more fecking seconds

5 seconds? Playing the second half wouldn't hurt.

I'll give you the 3rd quarter but the 4th was OK...

Symptomatic of a young side, but, it seems as though the learning process is a slow one. Hawthorn aren't exactly top 4 material and are without key personnel, you really needed to put them to the sword early in the third and put the game away when quite the opposite happened. Came out slow after half time and had no answers to their assault.

Having said that, another glaring example of inconsistent umpiring in the last quarter, fair dinkum, run in open space and throw it and it's a throw, throw it when you're getting tackled and all is well. Baffling.

Booney wrote:

Jase wrote:

Booney wrote:

Jase wrote:5 more seconds just 5 more fecking seconds

5 seconds? Playing the second half wouldn't hurt.

I'll give you the 3rd quarter but the 4th was OK...

Symptomatic of a young side, but, it seems as though the learning process is a slow one. Hawthorn aren't exactly top 4 material and are without key personnel, you really needed to put them to the sword early in the third and put the game away when quite the opposite happened. Came out slow after half time and had no answers to their assault.

Having said that, another glaring example of inconsistent umpiring in the last quarter, fair dinkum, run in open space and throw it and it's a throw, throw it when you're getting tackled and all is well. Baffling.

Totally agree with your comments... there was obviously going to be a reaction from the Hawks at the start of the 3rd but we just couldn't slow the momentum...

I was really proud with the way we kept going until the end in the 4th though... we didn't roll over and get belted but gave ourselves a chance to win...

I thought the umpiring was interesting to say the least but that isn't the reason we lost...

I don't understand the inability to see a throw or purely dropping the ball in n a tackle... if you don't handball or kick it should be incorrect disposal...

Onto the Roos this week... bloody terrifying... one we should have a good chance at winning, which usually means we wont...

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Rik E Boy wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Bloody Essendon. I've been saying the same thing. AMT kills us every time. We need to tick three things off before we loosen the lid

1. Essendon May headscratcher
2. The post bye slumber
3. The Chris Scott September shocker

2 and 3 in particular are bloody annoying as it has happened every year since we last one a flag.

regards,

REB

What's AMT?

4. Injuries - keep both Kelly & Ratatoulie sound, along with Gazz, and you are in it up to your elbows.

Corona Man wrote:What's AMT?.

Tippa

Corona Man wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:Guarantee we will get flogged by the bombers next week. They should be paying 3.20 and money for jam.

Bloody Essendon. I've been saying the same thing. AMT kills us every time. We need to tick three things off before we loosen the lid

1. Essendon May headscratcher
2. The post bye slumber
3. The Chris Scott September shocker

2 and 3 in particular are bloody annoying as it has happened every year since we last one a flag.

regards,

REB

What's AMT?

4. Injuries - keep both Kelly & Ratatoulie sound, along with Gazz, and you are in it up to your elbows.

Until September when they get all *ahem* catty with Scott.

Cats flag to lose

woodublieve12 wrote:Cats flag to lose