SA Footy

Rance out Richmond will only beat Port by about 8 goals now.

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Do you think Jack Riewoldt is the sort of player that needs to leave Richmond to realise his full potential? No smart arse responses. He bleeds ability but I believe he needs to be challenged and pushed. At Richmond I think he has too much say. I just think he would be an absolute gun in a good side with firm leaders.

I get what your saying but he has been very good for the past 18months-2years. He has matured a hell of a lot from the sook he was. Imagine the Tiges with out him.

carey wrote:Rance out Richmond will only beat Port by about 8 goals now.

Genuinely laughed at that.

CCOCS will be in full session next week

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Do you think Jack Riewoldt is the sort of player that needs to leave Richmond to realise his full potential? No smart arse responses. He bleeds ability but I believe he needs to be challenged and pushed. At Richmond I think he has too much say. I just think he would be an absolute gun in a good side with firm leaders.

Was the only one who kept them in it. They are a bottom 2 side without him

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Do you think Jack Riewoldt is the sort of player that needs to leave Richmond to realise his full potential? No smart arse responses. He bleeds ability but I believe he needs to be challenged and pushed. At Richmond I think he has too much say. I just think he would be an absolute gun in a good side with firm leaders.

Not sure, but I reckon it was the case for Vince - shows that for some the need to have to prove yourself again can be more important than meandering where you were

I know how he is currently playing and how Richmond would be without him. I'm just saying does he need to leave to realise his full potential? I reckon at another club he would be an absolute gun!

LaughingKookaburra wrote:I know how he is currently playing and how Richmond would be without him. I'm just saying does he need to leave to realise his full potential? I reckon at another club he would be an absolute gun!

It's worked for Toumpus, Polec and Dixon! They've been f**king suburb

***nothing to do with the topic at hand I know. Lol

I picked Melbourne and there is lots ti like about them but toward the end of the game there were some things that concerned me about their mental state.

Jones mouthing off to Cotchin to me means they are getting ahead of themselves. Viney's reaction at the end of the game wasn't exactly what I expected. It's almost like they weren't expecting to win.

Good win but they will need to back it up next week. Back to back wins for the first time in 5 years is great but it should be the start, not the end.

carey wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:I know how he is currently playing and how Richmond would be without him. I'm just saying does he need to leave to realise his full potential? I reckon at another club he would be an absolute gun!

It's worked for Toumpus, Polec and Dixon! They've been f**king suburb

***nothing to do with the topic at hand I know. Lol

Take it easy on Dixon, Booney gets a bit touchy about him

Jim05 wrote:

Grenville wrote:The Bolton effect, he's a good coach. He's learned from the best.

Best coach in the world wouldn't be able to do much with a sack of potatoes

Jim...no need to talk about Whoosha like that.

Go us

Farggggen stoked about today's game. We've been better every week and I'm really happy with the way we're structuring up. I don't care that Freo are 0-Fyfe but I think winning a game in Perth in any circumstances is huge. Well done Blues. Proud of the boys.

Is there a bigger waste of anything than Channel Seven's "Sounds of the game"?

Magellan wrote:Is there a bigger waste of anything than Channel Seven's "Sounds of the game"?

Nup. I keep saying it. Waste of time and effort.

gadj1976 wrote:

Magellan wrote:Is there a bigger waste of anything than Channel Seven's "Sounds of the game"?

Nup. I keep saying it. Waste of time and effort.

Whenever I am unlucky enough to tune in and catch it all I hear is someone calling for the ball, congratulating a teammate for doing something good, or telling someone to man up. Better off miking up a seagull.

Magellan wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

Magellan wrote:Is there a bigger waste of anything than Channel Seven's "Sounds of the game"?

Nup. I keep saying it. Waste of time and effort.

Whenever I am unlucky enough to tune in and catch it all I hear is someone calling for the ball, congratulating a teammate for doing something good, or telling someone to man up. Better off miking up a seagull.

All you'd here is "mine, mine, mine"

Yes I have kids and yes I've seen nemo LOTS of times

Corona Man wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Oh Bernie

Oh Rance... Enjoy your holiday, get a spray tan!

Bad by Rance.., Bernie has to go also.. first week back from a suspension & does the same.. bye bye

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Do you think Jack Riewoldt is the sort of player that needs to leave Richmond to realise his full potential? No smart arse responses. He bleeds ability but I believe he needs to be challenged and pushed. At Richmond I think he has too much say. I just think he would be an absolute gun in a good side with firm leaders.

Ridic call.... only he & Rance (also Edwards) have been the only blokes putting in for the Tigs... No Riewoldt & tigs are a complete shamble.!!! One of the best key forwards of last 2 & half years easy!!!

That wasn't the question I asked nor the point I made....

I asked whether he needs to leave Richmond to realise his absolute full potential? I mentioned he's a good player who bleeds talent. I reckon if he played for a club with well established leaders that he would be an absolute gun. Right now he's a very good player but I think he has the ability to kick 80+ goals a season.

David Brent wrote:

Corona Man wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Oh Bernie

Oh Rance... Enjoy your holiday, get a spray tan!

Bad by Rance.., Bernie has to go also.. first week back from a suspension & does the same.. bye bye

Bernie should get rewarded for defending his mate, after that dog act by Rance

Bernie did an identical act in the 2nd quarter i think, just not as hard. They showed it about 3 times

MW wrote:Bernie did an identical act in the 2nd quarter i think, just not as hard. They showed it about 3 times

Was it Bernie or Viney who came up and got Rance after the dirty incident? I may have got it wrong?