SA Footy

MatteeG wrote:

morell wrote:You can have your half back flanker, Hawthorn:

It's funny but most Port folks point to that or the Shrug on Burgoyne in the pre season comp when they discuss SPP. You can keep your stiff arm hero...

The don't argue is the most overrated thing in football

Burton $1.65
McGrath $3.50
Powell-Pepper $3.75

MW wrote:

MatteeG wrote:

morell wrote:You can have your half back flanker, Hawthorn:

It's funny but most Port folks point to that or the Shrug on Burgoyne in the pre season comp when they discuss SPP. You can keep your stiff arm hero...

The don't argue is the most overrated thing in football

Ay?

It can be the difference between a holding the ball, a shitty uncontrolled scrubber release or a clean disposal to a team mate.

Some stats...

MW wrote:Some stats...

Yeah but that doesn't take into account the Z quotient when divided by the percentage of the algorithm determined by the current distance of the moon from the earth.

MW wrote:Some stats...

Don't think you can go purely off stats - those three all play different roles and positions which is clear by the large discrepancy over all fields.

I rate Burton highly, but I also think he should comfortably be above the rest - this is a guy who began playing regularly last year and injury is what cost him a finals spot.. he probably should've been nominated last year.

McGrath is a gun too.

I think any of those 3 are worthy winners.

Agree they've all been impressive and could go to any of those three.

**** that.

SPP's 2017 is streets ahead of both of them.

morell wrote:**** that.

SPP's 2017 is streets ahead of both of them.

All in the eye of the beholder son.

MW wrote:Some stats...

I know all 3 play completely different roles. What is SPP averaging for contested possies & clearances?

I guess you can match that up with metres gained / rebound 50's / intercept marks for Burton as a comparison for roles possibly?

Zartan wrote:

morell wrote:**** that.

SPP's 2017 is streets ahead of both of them.

All in the eye of the beholder son.

**** that too.

He's objectively having the best season in terms of helping his team win football games.

Grind my gears Zarts! Grinds em!

bertiebeatle wrote:

MW wrote:Some stats...

I know all 3 play completely different roles. What is SPP averaging for contested possies & clearances?

I guess you can match that up with metres gained / rebound 50's / intercept marks for Burton as a comparison for roles possibly?

A clanger comparison would be interesting too.

A whopping .5 of a difference between SPP and Burton for Clangers.

Considering 50% of SPPs disposals are contested that should actually be a much higher discrepancy.

morell wrote:**** that.

SPP's 2017 is streets ahead of both of them.

Wait, is that .. is that an opinion??

No, it's a conclusion.

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:Some stats...

Yeah but that doesn't take into account the Z quotient when divided by the percentage of the algorithm determined by the current distance of the moon from the earth.

Then multiplied by your IQ and divided by the size of your c*ck.

amber_fluid wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:Some stats...

Yeah but that doesn't take into account the Z quotient when divided by the percentage of the algorithm determined by the current distance of the moon from the earth.

Then multiplied by your IQ and divided by the size of your c*ck.

I did that and the divisor didn't change the answer

amber_fluid wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:Some stats...

Yeah but that doesn't take into account the Z quotient when divided by the percentage of the algorithm determined by the current distance of the moon from the earth.

Then multiplied by your IQ and divided by the size of your c*ck.

cant divide by zero

morell wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MW wrote:Some stats...

Yeah but that doesn't take into account the Z quotient when divided by the percentage of the algorithm determined by the current distance of the moon from the earth.

Then multiplied by your IQ and divided by the size of your c*ck.

I did that and the divisor didn't change the answer

Literally spat my drink out when I read that, well played!

morell wrote:No, it's a conclusion.

* conclusions based on individual opinions are a scourge on society