Re: Round thirteen thirteeeen
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 8:41 am
I'm sorry people get offended by **** all these days.
daysofourlives wrote:locky801 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Free kicks
Power 18
Hawks 8
yeah but powder fans will still whinge
My spastic ******* mother(power member) said and i quote" you brought us down to your level"
I replied with lucky you had the 3 extra players
Her "youre kidding arent you"
They are certainly a special kind of breed arent they,
I dont just blame them though, we are still copping it from the Clarko holding the ball outburst, no umpire can handle being told theyre doing it wrong, especially from a coach. It was never going to end well for us. Id love to know the stats since that North game on both FF and FA plus ones we dont get.
Rucking infringements are a raffle at the best of times, but i thought Lycett to Butters for the sealer was one of the most obvious frees youll ever get. We still wouldnt have won and i hope we dont win another game, i quite like having the no2 draft pick
Bum Crack wrote:I'm sorry people get offended by **** all these days.
We were extremely accurate whilst they missed plenty of easy shots. Richmond had a lot of poor inside 50’s where they just bombed it in and a lot of shallow entries where our defenders managed to hold them off.daysofourlives wrote:Spargo wrote:Inside 50’s - Richmond 67-24 Essendon
How the **** do you only lose by 12 pts with those figures
Jim05 wrote:We were extremely accurate whilst they missed plenty of easy shots. Richmond had a lot of poor inside 50’s where they just bombed it in and a lot of shallow entries where our defenders managed to hold them off.daysofourlives wrote:Spargo wrote:Inside 50’s - Richmond 67-24 Essendon
How the **** do you only lose by 12 pts with those figures
Wasn’t much in it but Lynch did give a sly push/jab to Hurley’s throat.daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:We were extremely accurate whilst they missed plenty of easy shots. Richmond had a lot of poor inside 50’s where they just bombed it in and a lot of shallow entries where our defenders managed to hold them off.daysofourlives wrote:Spargo wrote:Inside 50’s - Richmond 67-24 Essendon
How the **** do you only lose by 12 pts with those figures
Can we just give Lynch a game and stop all the crap.
While we're at it lets make any head rubs to an oppo player a free kick. I watched local U15 and U17 footy yesterday and its rife in that, you cant expect kids that age to have the same discipline as an AFL footballer to be able to ignore. At some stage some kid will snap.
He got told this week that any more indiscretions and he would be sent directly to the tribunal so let’s see if they do or notdaysofourlives wrote:Agree wasnt much in it, he will get another fine, how often can you keep fining blokes before enough is enough.
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Cats are flat as a tack
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Holding the ball out the window, both teams getting away with playing rugby..
But the 15m is just ridiculous...
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Wedgie wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Holding the ball out the window, both teams getting away with playing rugby..
But the 15m is just ridiculous...
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
For years they let players get away with 5 - 10 metre kicks, today they're calling 25 metre kicks play on.
Obviously the rule of the day and must have been the only discussion before the game by the umpires.
Armchair expert wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Cats are flat as a tack
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Crows stop running in the second half, still an easy win coming for you
Armchair expert wrote:Jenkins offers a lot more than Esava
Brodlach wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Jenkins offers a lot more than Esava
Has JJ played this season?
daysofourlives wrote:My spastic ******* mother(power member)
Booney wrote:daysofourlives wrote:My spastic ******* mother(power member)
She'd be so proud.