SA Footy

carey wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Not a complete bush pig either

Hard to believe but I’ve done worse

Gee I’m surprised

amber_fluid wrote:

carey wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Not a complete bush pig either

Hard to believe but I’ve done worse

Anyone that says they haven’t is full of shit.

I won’t mention how much worse

carey wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:

carey wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Not a complete bush pig either

Hard to believe but I’ve done worse

Anyone that says they haven’t is full of shit.

I won’t mention how much worse

Westies Pram lady says ‘hi Carey’

carey wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Not a complete bush pig either

Hard to believe but I’ve done worse

Yes, Victa, you have.

Just saw Rampke on the news..... geez he is Tex Walker stupid!

Corona Man wrote:Just saw Rampke on the news..... geez he is Tex Walker stupid!

Harsh

Booney wrote:

carey wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Not a complete bush pig either

Hard to believe but I’ve done worse

Yes, Victa, you have.

That was a footy trip. All bets are off on footy trips.

Wedgie wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Just saw Rampke on the news..... geez he is Tex Walker stupid!

Harsh

Yep Tex is smarter than Rampe

Brodlach wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Just saw Rampke on the news..... geez he is Tex Walker stupid!

Harsh

Yep Tex is smarter than Rampe

****. How does Rampe get out of the house in then morning then.

stan wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Just saw Rampke on the news..... geez he is Tex Walker stupid!

Harsh

Yep Tex is smarter than Rampe

****. How does Rampe get out of the house in then morning then.

He wouldn't be able to get out of bed let alone the house if he was more stupid than Taylor.

Heppell must be loving it, without Rampe all the attention would be on him after being big smiles after losing a season defining match.

Spargo wrote:Ablett not even cited.

Rules for some and rules for others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Turbo wrote:

Spargo wrote:Ablett not even cited.

Rules for some and rules for others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nothing in it clearly. Just an honest good Christain elbow to the head lol.

Being serious I thought it was less of an impact than last week.

stan wrote:

Turbo wrote:

Spargo wrote:Ablett not even cited.

Rules for some and rules for others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nothing in it clearly. Just an honest good Christian elbow to the head lol.

Being serious I thought it was less of an impact than last week.

Absolute joke not to be found guilty last week even if only a fine let alone not even be cited this week
And I will call out that I personally think G. Ablett is a champ and the best I have seen in my time..

Reckless..... Yes
High contact..... Yes
Impact....Low to medium
Outcome.... At a minimum it is guilty and probably a fine last week but a game for the exact replica incident this week as he hadn't learn't.
What will it take, a fractured eye socket or something ?

The North Melbourne lad gets a game for a clash of heads with Rohan after tucking up well to bump in the act of a shepherd ( that art is gone now too !! )
Yes yes yes he chose to bump.
Ablett chose to jump off the ground again and raise his arms and make head contact.. Twice now !!!

Well, the AFL have absolutely guaranteed one thing.

The booing of a Ablett will continue bigger and stronger.
Not about his faith beliefs but because there clear evidence in this that he is being treated more favorably than others !!!!

Would love to know how they choose the Rising Star Nomination each week. Criteria seems to change week to week from having a body of work to earn it or just one good game.

Can't see how a lad who is eligible can get 6 coaches votes in a win & not get a nomination. Staggering.

David Brent wrote:Would love to know how they choose the Rising Star Nomination each week. Criteria seems to change week to week from having a body of work to earn it or just one good game.

Can't see how a lad who is eligible can get 6 coaches votes in a win & not get a nomination. Staggering.

Who got it and who got ripped off?

Lightning McQueen wrote:

David Brent wrote:Would love to know how they choose the Rising Star Nomination each week. Criteria seems to change week to week from having a body of work to earn it or just one good game.

Can't see how a lad who is eligible can get 6 coaches votes in a win & not get a nomination. Staggering.

Who got it and who got ripped off?

I think Myers from Geelong got it?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Who got it and who got ripped off?

I think Myers from Geelong got it?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Yep, Miers got it.

Who were you thinking DB? Bolton or Stack?

No kidding wrote:

stan wrote:

Turbo wrote:

Spargo wrote:Ablett not even cited.

Rules for some and rules for others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nothing in it clearly. Just an honest good Christian elbow to the head lol.

Being serious I thought it was less of an impact than last week.

Absolute joke not to be found guilty last week even if only a fine let alone not even be cited this week
And I will call out that I personally think G. Ablett is a champ and the best I have seen in my time..

Reckless..... Yes
High contact..... Yes
Impact....Low to medium
Outcome.... At a minimum it is guilty and probably a fine last week but a game for the exact replica incident this week as he hadn't learn't.
What will it take, a fractured eye socket or something ?

The North Melbourne lad gets a game for a clash of heads with Rohan after tucking up well to bump in the act of a shepherd ( that art is gone now too !! )
Yes yes yes he chose to bump.
Ablett chose to jump off the ground again and raise his arms and make head contact.. Twice now !!!

Well, the AFL have absolutely guaranteed one thing.

The booing of a Ablett will continue bigger and stronger.
Not about his faith beliefs but because there clear evidence in this that he is being treated more favorably than others !!!!

Spot on NK
The inconsistencies with the rulings continue to broaden and become more mystifying by the week.
The AFL are all huff and puff when it comes to clamping down on dangerous actions. They just want a bit each way it seems
If its a no name nobody player they make an example of them but if its a high profile player they duck for cover and come up with all sorts of PISS WEAK excuses to avoid a backlash but at the same time they just dig themselves into a deeper hole.
Mark Robertson summed it up perfectly last night on AFL 360 on both the non reporting of Ablett and Fyffe along with the brain fade of Rampe climbing the goalpost.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Who got it and who got ripped off?

I think Myers from Geelong got it?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Yep, Miers got it.

Who were you thinking DB? Bolton or Stack?

Bolton- 4 goals, 16 disposals, 7 tackles, 9 score involvements & 6 Coaches Votes as above.

Miers- 1 goal, 22 Disposals, 2 tackles, 7 score involvements & 0 coaches votes.

I get that Miers has had the better season but last week they rewarded Zurhaar for his one off out standing game then the next week they reward consistency over a stand out game. That's more my point I'm trying to make (as well as trying to get a tiger recognised.)