Re: Port Adelaide 2021
Posted: Tue May 04, 2021 1:16 pm
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:I know I'm not.
#TheOracle
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:I know I'm not.
#TheOracle
Jim05 wrote:This is exactly what should happen.whufc wrote:P.s
If the AFL gave you permission to wear the Magpie guernsey once a year in the home showdowns but you were never ever ever allowed to request and raise any further usage of the magpie guernsey under circumstances and it was 100% legally binding for the next 100 years.....would you sign the deal?
The AFL and Port should sign a iron clad agreement that the PB’s can be worn once per year at Port’s home showdown and it never be mentioned again. No other special occasions or anything ever again even if heritage round returns.
whufc wrote:I think the biggest issue in this whole saga is the AFL lack any sort of faith in PA, their history Port have had a history of always wanting more (which isnt a bad thing) and signing what ever suits them at the time.They entered the league looking to remove themselves from the Magpie history, the club were open about that it was undeniable.
25 years on and they have made a very clear push to distance themselves from the Power and come under the moniker of PA. .
The Bedge wrote:whufc wrote:I think the biggest issue in this whole saga is the AFL lack any sort of faith in PA, their history Port have had a history of always wanting more (which isnt a bad thing) and signing what ever suits them at the time.They entered the league looking to remove themselves from the Magpie history, the club were open about that it was undeniable.
25 years on and they have made a very clear push to distance themselves from the Power and come under the moniker of PA. .
**** you dribble some shit
The Bedge wrote:whufc wrote:I think the biggest issue in this whole saga is the AFL lack any sort of faith in PA, their history Port have had a history of always wanting more (which isnt a bad thing) and signing what ever suits them at the time.They entered the league looking to remove themselves from the Magpie history, the club were open about that it was undeniable.
25 years on and they have made a very clear push to distance themselves from the Power and come under the moniker of PA. .
**** you dribble some shit
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:They are wearing it in the Showdown tomorrow
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
The SANFL showdownLightning McQueen wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:They are wearing it in the Showdown tomorrow
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Where does it say that?
The Showdown starting at 2.10 at Adelaide OvalLightning McQueen wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:They are wearing it in the Showdown tomorrow
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Where does it say that?
Jim05 wrote:The SANFL showdownLightning McQueen wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:They are wearing it in the Showdown tomorrow
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Where does it say that?
mots02 wrote:PRISON BAR JUMPERS SELLOUT
Sales of Port’s heritage guernsey have gone nuts at the Port Store at Alberton ahead of tomorrow night’s Showdown.
The club says it has sold out of the lace-up prison-bar guernsey, while 250 of the long sleeve woollen prison bar jumpers have been sold at $250 a pop, netting the club $62,500.
The uptake in traditional merchandise comes after the AFL refused to allow Port to wear the old strip during its state clash with the Crows following objections from Collingwood who also don black and white stripes.
The marketing ploy has worked a treat. Fans engaged (and enraged), money in the bank.
Well played PAFC.
Were the guernseys given to Port or have they just neglected to add in the cost?mots02 wrote:PRISON BAR JUMPERS SELLOUT
Sales of Port’s heritage guernsey have gone nuts at the Port Store at Alberton ahead of tomorrow night’s Showdown.
The club says it has sold out of the lace-up prison-bar guernsey, while 250 of the long sleeve woollen prison bar jumpers have been sold at $250 a pop, netting the club $62,500.
The uptake in traditional merchandise comes after the AFL refused to allow Port to wear the old strip during its state clash with the Crows following objections from Collingwood who also don black and white stripes.
The marketing ploy has worked a treat. Fans engaged (and enraged), money in the bank.
Well played PAFC.
Wedgie wrote:mots02 wrote:PRISON BAR JUMPERS SELLOUT
Sales of Port’s heritage guernsey have gone nuts at the Port Store at Alberton ahead of tomorrow night’s Showdown.
The club says it has sold out of the lace-up prison-bar guernsey, while 250 of the long sleeve woollen prison bar jumpers have been sold at $250 a pop, netting the club $62,500.
The uptake in traditional merchandise comes after the AFL refused to allow Port to wear the old strip during its state clash with the Crows following objections from Collingwood who also don black and white stripes.
The marketing ploy has worked a treat. Fans engaged (and enraged), money in the bank.
Well played PAFC.
They've well and truly rooted any chance they have of wearing it again and will probably have $62,500 less in their hand out from the AFL this year.
Well played? I think not.
If they played it smart they might have had a chance but none now.
mots02 wrote:A MAGA campaign with prison bar guernseys instead of stupid red hats.
Wedgie wrote:It will be no cash in the long run and has meant they have no chance of wearing the defunct clubs guernsey now.
They're also losing a lot of support they had for their cause by clearly breaking a contract which is also dangerous ground when you're not financially viable.
Only a loss for Port.
If they'd approached it from a logical point of view and adhered to the contract they signed they would have had 99% of the footy public behind them and also made more money in the long run.
They're ****** now.
Dumb.
valleys07 wrote:Wedgie wrote:It will be no cash in the long run and has meant they have no chance of wearing the defunct clubs guernsey now.
They're also losing a lot of support they had for their cause by clearly breaking a contract which is also dangerous ground when you're not financially viable.
Only a loss for Port.
If they'd approached it from a logical point of view and adhered to the contract they signed they would have had 99% of the footy public behind them and also made more money in the long run.
They're ****** now.
Dumb.
Are we sure Port are breaking a contract in the example Mots has mentioned above? I'm thinking that the article is a poor choice of words, rather than a breach of contract.
As far as I am aware (happy for someone to correct me here), but there is nothing preventing Port from selling any prison bar guernsey which features the magpies SANFL emblem, which is what I believe has been on sale at the Port store. So long as the guernsey does not feature any emblem/logo/sponsorship which is considered part of the AFL's IP, I don't believe we are in breach.