Page 27 of 78

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:01 pm
by cracka
Zartan wrote:Dangerfield 33 Carlton Draughts, and 129 Dreamteam points.. Adelaide still a better side with out him? ;)

He certainly racked them up. Most saying Sloane was the better player but if you look at the numbers, Danger was the winner.
And there is no way we are better off without him. We'd be closer to 7 & 1 if he was still here IMO.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:06 pm
by JK
cracka wrote:
Zartan wrote:Dangerfield 33 Carlton Draughts, and 129 Dreamteam points.. Adelaide still a better side with out him? ;)

He certainly racked them up. Most saying Sloane was the better player but if you look at the numbers, Danger was the winner.
And there is no way we are better off without him. We'd be closer to 7 & 1 if he was still here IMO.


As a neutral I thought Sloane had the better game on Friday night. and comfortably .. As someone else alluded to earlier (Booney I think), Sloane didn't have a lot of buddies so stood out as a bit of a one man band.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:25 pm
by cracka
JK wrote:
cracka wrote:
Zartan wrote:Dangerfield 33 Carlton Draughts, and 129 Dreamteam points.. Adelaide still a better side with out him? ;)

He certainly racked them up. Most saying Sloane was the better player but if you look at the numbers, Danger was the winner.
And there is no way we are better off without him. We'd be closer to 7 & 1 if he was still here IMO.


As a neutral I thought Sloane had the better game on Friday night. and comfortably .. As someone else alluded to earlier (Booney I think), Sloane didn't have a lot of buddies so stood out as a bit of a one man band.

Certainly would have sore shoulders from carrying the rest of the mids from Friday night.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 10:21 am
by Dutchy
bennymacca wrote:
Dutchy wrote:When is Scott Thompson going to announce his retirement?


Was awesome for the first 6 rounds of the year, and to be honest we still need him as the crouch boys aren't there yet.

Could see him playing next year too


The guy butchers the ball and never hurt opponents, agree with Booney hope he plays on!

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 10:42 am
by hawks21
Dutchy wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Dutchy wrote:When is Scott Thompson going to announce his retirement?


Was awesome for the first 6 rounds of the year, and to be honest we still need him as the crouch boys aren't there yet.

Could see him playing next year too


The guy butchers the ball and never hurt opponents, agree with Booney hope he plays on!

:roll: :roll: He turns 34 next year so i doubt he will go on. Has been a great player and servant. Hopefully we will use his and Dangers money a quality outside midfielder.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2016 11:47 am
by Feenix
JK wrote:
cracka wrote:
Zartan wrote:Dangerfield 33 Carlton Draughts, and 129 Dreamteam points.. Adelaide still a better side with out him? ;)

He certainly racked them up. Most saying Sloane was the better player but if you look at the numbers, Danger was the winner.
And there is no way we are better off without him. We'd be closer to 7 & 1 if he was still here IMO.


As a neutral I thought Sloane had the better game on Friday night. and comfortably .. As someone else alluded to earlier (Booney I think), Sloane didn't have a lot of buddies so stood out as a bit of a one man band.

Sloane was definitely better than Dangerfield on Friday his possessions had a lot more influence on the game. Some of Dangerfield's possessions were terrible

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2016 11:30 pm
by marbles
so brad crouch is out of contract who grew up just north of geelong probably loving the cats is not really getting a run would be missing home and has done enough to earn a decent contract to possibly head back to that area :D do i sense a common theme here

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:43 am
by Grahaml
Dangerfield wasn't really getting a run?

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 7:21 am
by BoundaryRider84
marbles wrote:so brad crouch is out of contract who grew up just north of geelong probably loving the cats is not really getting a run would be missing home and has done enough to earn a decent contract to possibly head back to that area :D do i sense a common theme here

No thanks you can keep him

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 8:25 am
by MW
marbles wrote:so brad crouch is out of contract who grew up just north of geelong probably loving the cats is not really getting a run would be missing home and has done enough to earn a decent contract to possibly head back to that area :D do i sense a common theme here


done enough :lol:
For Carlton standards, sure

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:50 am
by hawks21
Pyke has indicated a couple of changes this week (in the midfield). I thought Thommo might be rested but Pyke has said he will play.

Lyons and or Ellis-Yoleman big chances to come in.

I think Douglas is in trouble.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 10:51 am
by MW
Don't be surprised if Thommo is rested.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:33 am
by bennymacca
Douglas and crouch I reckon. Maybe just one of them

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:50 am
by Feenix
Surely Douglas will be dropped hes been terrible.

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 11:58 am
by MW
bennymacca wrote:Douglas and crouch I reckon. Maybe just one of them


Crouch will be better for the run against GC
Thommo needs a rest
Douglas needs to be dropped and brought back for GWS as we need his pace

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:12 pm
by Booney
MW wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Douglas and crouch I reckon. Maybe just one of them


Crouch will be better for the run against GC
Thommo needs a rest
Douglas needs to be dropped and brought back for GWS as we need his pace


:shock: Malcolm Douglas? Michael Douglas?

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:18 pm
by MW
The point being we need HIS pace...not saying he's quick but he's quicker than the alternatives

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 12:29 pm
by JK
Booney wrote:
MW wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Douglas and crouch I reckon. Maybe just one of them


Crouch will be better for the run against GC
Thommo needs a rest
Douglas needs to be dropped and brought back for GWS as we need his pace


:shock: Malcolm Douglas? Michael Douglas?


Buster Douglas? Kirk Douglas?

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:01 pm
by Corona Man
MW wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Douglas and crouch I reckon. Maybe just one of them


Crouch will be better for the run against GC
Thommo needs a rest
Douglas needs to be dropped and brought back for GWS as we need his pace

So his pace, is only an asset when playing GWS? Or does he run slower in Qld - :roll:

Re: Crows 2016

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:10 pm
by MW
Corona Man wrote:
MW wrote:
bennymacca wrote:Douglas and crouch I reckon. Maybe just one of them


Crouch will be better for the run against GC
Thommo needs a rest
Douglas needs to be dropped and brought back for GWS as we need his pace

So his pace, is only an asset when playing GWS? Or does he run slower in Qld - :roll:


I'm sure you are a smart guy, work it out