Re: AFL 360 - (and other Foxtel footy programs)
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:04 pm
Yeah, a good mate knows Gerard well so teed it up whilst in melb.
gadj1976 wrote:did anyone see On the Couch on Monday night? In particular the ridiculousness of Gieschen interpreting the uninterpretable? So you can't push, block, bump or hold, but you can 1/2 push, 3/4 push 'use your forearm as a bumper' and hold your ground.
What a load of codswallop.
JK wrote:gadj1976 wrote:did anyone see On the Couch on Monday night? In particular the ridiculousness of Gieschen interpreting the uninterpretable? So you can't push, block, bump or hold, but you can 1/2 push, 3/4 push 'use your forearm as a bumper' and hold your ground.
What a load of codswallop.
Totally agree, it's madness
Baron Greenback wrote:JK wrote:gadj1976 wrote:did anyone see On the Couch on Monday night? In particular the ridiculousness of Gieschen interpreting the uninterpretable? So you can't push, block, bump or hold, but you can 1/2 push, 3/4 push 'use your forearm as a bumper' and hold your ground.
What a load of codswallop.
Totally agree, it's madness
Absolute arseclown who is ruining our great game.
And don't get me started on KB. Flog.
gadj1976 wrote:did anyone see On the Couch on Monday night? In particular the ridiculousness of Gieschen interpreting the uninterpretable? So you can't push, block, bump or hold, but you can 1/2 push, 3/4 push 'use your forearm as a bumper' and hold your ground.
What a load of codswallop.
gadj1976 wrote:Baron Greenback wrote:JK wrote:gadj1976 wrote:did anyone see On the Couch on Monday night? In particular the ridiculousness of Gieschen interpreting the uninterpretable? So you can't push, block, bump or hold, but you can 1/2 push, 3/4 push 'use your forearm as a bumper' and hold your ground.
What a load of codswallop.
Totally agree, it's madness
Absolute arseclown who is ruining our great game.
And don't get me started on KB. Flog.
I just read that KB reckons Chris Scott and Nathan Buckley have lost it.......... http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/d ... 2j80y.html
Why don't the AFL realise we need a rules summit, not a rules committee and start listening to people who made the game what it is/was. Roos, Matthews, Walls........people of that type of ilk to determine what the game should look like. Not blokes who have a vested interest in it like KB who's there to keep himself gainfully employed and also defends his turf, when it isn't his turf to defend.
whufc wrote:There is only two rule changes i like in the last 10 years.
1/ Chopping the arms, rewards the player infront.
2/The rush behind rule, makes the players play the game.
The rules i despise are
1/ The sliding rule
2/ the 4896 different interpretations of the holding the ball these days
3/ the sub rule (has killed fantasy football lol )
4/ the 25 for running within the 5? metre zone after a free kick, especially when the player has no intention of affecting the play and on occasions is following their opponent.
test wrote:Did anyone watch On The Couch interview with Peter Jackson? Impressive man and seems the right man for Melbourne going forward.
Spargo wrote:Robbo not holding back in giving it to the AFL tonight.
Things starting to sway the way of Essendon I feel.
Turbo wrote:Spargo wrote:Robbo not holding back in giving it to the AFL tonight.
Things starting to sway the way of Essendon I feel.
Robbo is a bomber PR rep. Nothing to see here
Jim05 wrote:Turbo wrote:Spargo wrote:Robbo not holding back in giving it to the AFL tonight.
Things starting to sway the way of Essendon I feel.
Robbo is a bomber PR rep. Nothing to see here
FALSE
He is far from it anymore
The club even revoked his membership