Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:09 ammighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:31 amMW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:21 pmMW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:23 pmMW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:25 pmwoodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:32 pmSpargo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:34 pmMW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:36 pmmighty hounds wrote:MW wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Rory Laird signs on for 3 more years
While he was not ever going to leave, that IMO is a more important signing than Sloane. Very happy.
Ridiculous, completely disagree with that
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:38 pmPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:25 pmmorell wrote:Em Dubs you've lost me on that one.
Sloane is an exceptionally good two way midfielder. Laird is a good quality back pocket.
There is also no way in hell Laird could offer the offensive capabilities Sloane does in the midfield.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:28 pmPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:30 pmPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:34 pmmorell wrote:He's a back pocket.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:37 pmMW wrote:morell wrote:He's a back pocket.
So was Gavin Wanganeen
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:48 pmmorell wrote:He's a back pocket.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:50 pmBooney wrote:MW wrote:morell wrote:He's a back pocket.
So was Gavin Wanganeen
HOW DARE YOU!
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:55 pmstan wrote:While I would agree that the loss of Laird or Sloane would be a huge loss for the crows, I would say losing Sloane is much bigger. Don't get me wrong Laird is a very good player and if your freaky camps get too much we are happy to take him off your hands, but I feel that you can least afford to lose your best midfielder only a few years are losing your then best midfield.
That would start to leave a hole and whilst the young players are coming through, it would start to get a bit much to cover.
Sort of sounds like MW is trying to talk down Sloane so the possible loss of him wont seem so bad.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:59 pmPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 2:08 pmBrodlach wrote:It is interesting that it’s always these SEN ‘blokes’ coming up with the Crow stories
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 2:19 pmMW wrote:
Put it this way...
Could Laird go into the midfield and do what Sloane does? Most likely yes.
Could Sloane go down back and do what Laird does? Not a chance.
IMO...
