SA Footy

tigerpie wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Am I missing it, how long is the suspension?

Minimum 3 months....if it can be proved that it was taken out of competition.

Sent from my SM-A546E using Tapatalk

Did he not test positive on game day?
Pretty sure that's in competition.

whufc wrote:

tigerpie wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Am I missing it, how long is the suspension?

Minimum 3 months....if it can be proved that it was taken out of competition.

Sent from my SM-A546E using Tapatalk

Did he not test positive on game day?
Pretty sure that's in competition.

How long would something like coke stay in the system to be tested as being 'in competition'

Given how early players have to get to the ground these days im presuming he has had to take it somewhere in the changerooms for it to have an affect by the time the game comes along. Presuming he is taking it for increased game day performance rather than just recreational abuse.

AFL rules dictate that the “in-competition” period starts at “11:59pm on the day before a competition in which the athlete is scheduled to participate through the end of such competition and the sample collection process’’.

whufc wrote:

tigerpie wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Am I missing it, how long is the suspension?

Minimum 3 months....if it can be proved that it was taken out of competition.

Sent from my SM-A546E using Tapatalk

Did he not test positive on game day?
Pretty sure that's in competition.

How long would something like coke stay in the system to be tested as being 'in competition'

Given how early players have to get to the ground these days im presuming he has had to take it somewhere in the changerooms for it to have an affect by the time the game comes along. Presuming he is taking it for increased game day performance rather than just recreational abuse.

A rewriting of the AFL’s anti-doping code in 2021 stipulated that an athlete who tests positive in-competition to a “substance of abuse”, which includes cocaine, could be banned for just three months if the athlete can prove the substance was used out of competition and was “unrelated to sporting performance”.

Also under the AFL’s anti-doping code, if the player can prove the violation was not intentional or there are other circumstances or completes a treatment program approved by AFL, the ban could be as little as a month.

daysofourlives wrote:Funny how its always no names that get caught.
Never an absolute star of the game.
But we know the AFL does everything above board, they would never hide anything. Just a coincidence

Is this the culture Goodwin speaks of ad nauseum?

tigerpie wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Funny how its always no names that get caught.
Never an absolute star of the game.
But we know the AFL does everything above board, they would never hide anything. Just a coincidence

Is this the culture Goodwin speaks of ad nauseum?

There's a reason they're absolute stars....they look after themselves off field.
Not doing lines or going to the races the night before a grand final.
More ridiculous conspiracy theories from you Daisy that doesn't surprise me.
They do test the stars.....Dane Swan was getting piss tested at 6 am the morning after a game regularly.

tigerpie wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Funny how its always no names that get caught.
Never an absolute star of the game.
But we know the AFL does everything above board, they would never hide anything. Just a coincidence

Is this the culture Goodwin speaks of ad nauseum?

There's a reason they're absolute stars....they look after themselves off field.
Not doing lines or going to the races the night before a grand final.
More ridiculous conspiracy theories from you Daisy that doesn't surprise me.
They do test the stars.....Dane Swan was getting piss tested at 6 am the morning after a game regularly.

Zelezny Chucks wrote:LOL imagine using Dane Swan as an example of a clean star

tigerpie wrote:They do test the stars.....Dane Swan was getting piss tested at 6 am the morning after a game regularly.

Booney wrote:

Zelezny Chucks wrote:LOL imagine using Dane Swan as an example of a clean star

Of all the choices.

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:

Zelezny Chucks wrote:LOL imagine using Dane Swan as an example of a clean star

Of all the choices.

My comment was in reference to the statement that they don't test the stars.
I didn't say he was clean did I?
I said he was a star that got hounded by the testers, even when he was overseas on holidays.
He has never tested positive.

tigerpie wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Funny how its always no names that get caught.
Never an absolute star of the game.
But we know the AFL does everything above board, they would never hide anything. Just a coincidence

Is this the culture Goodwin speaks of ad nauseum?

There's a reason they're absolute stars....they look after themselves off field.
Not doing lines or going to the races the night before a grand final.
More ridiculous conspiracy theories from you Daisy that doesn't surprise me.
They do test the stars.....Dane Swan was getting piss tested at 6 am the morning after a game regularly.

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:

Zelezny Chucks wrote:LOL imagine using Dane Swan as an example of a clean star

Of all the choices.

My comment was in reference to the statement that they don't test the stars.
I didn't say he was clean did I?
I said he was a star that got hounded by the testers, even when he was overseas on holidays.
He has never tested positive.