Syndicate ATO court case

Best Bets? Talking Odds? This is the place.

Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Interceptor » Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:02 pm

The ATO is chasing money from a long running high-stakes syndicate that is essentially claiming it's a hobby!

http://www.theage.com.au/national/36m-in-profits-gambling-business-just-a-hobby-ato-told-20120802-23gpf.html
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2985
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby OnSong » Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:12 pm

Interceptor wrote:The ATO is chasing money from a long running high-stakes syndicate that is essentially claiming it's a hobby!

http://www.theage.com.au/national/36m-in-profits-gambling-business-just-a-hobby-ato-told-20120802-23gpf.html

Where do I sign up?

They must be avid readers of the Late Mal!
Right in front of me. RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME!
User avatar
OnSong
Coach
 
Posts: 11152
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:53 pm
Has liked: 650 times
Been liked: 739 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Groover » Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:25 pm

I dont know how the ato can expect any money from a punters club! What would happen if the club lost all its money? Do they cjhae the ato for their money back? IMO its stupid to ask for tax on their winnings...
Hogg Shield Premier League Winner 2012
User avatar
Groover
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 2821
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 10:50 pm
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 391 times
Grassroots Team: Brahma Lodge

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby dedja » Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:27 pm

True, and their turnover is only $2.5 billion ...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.

This post has not been approved by Dave from Alberton.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 21584
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 388 times
Been liked: 1204 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Mythical Creature » Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:36 pm

$2.453 billion dollar turnover for $66 million profit.

Thats only a return of 2.7% unless I am reading it wrong! :?
If you don't like it, change it. If you don't want to change it, it can't be that bad!
User avatar
Mythical Creature
Veteran
 
Posts: 3580
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:22 am
Has liked: 189 times
Been liked: 240 times
Grassroots Team: United

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby valleys07 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:55 pm

Mythical Creature wrote:$2.453 billion dollar turnover for $66 million profit.

Thats only a return of 2.7% unless I am reading it wrong! :?


Thats what i have come up with too MC. Still handy!!!!
“Think of me like Yoda, but instead of being little and green I wear suits and I'm awesome. I'm your bro—I'm Broda!”

HOGG Shield 2015 Division I Premiers.
HOGG Shield 2017 Premier League Premiers.
User avatar
valleys07
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9166
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: From a place much more pure than yours
Has liked: 769 times
Been liked: 1173 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby MAY-Z » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:15 pm

Groover wrote:I dont know how the ato can expect any money from a punters club! What would happen if the club lost all its money? Do they cjhae the ato for their money back? IMO its stupid to ask for tax on their winnings...


this is as the ato are considering it to be a business

the things that the ato look at for determining if it is a business are

- whether the bets are conducted in an organised systematic and businesslike way
- the volume and size of the bets
- whether the betting is dependent largely on chance or a reward for skill
- whether they are betting for profit or pleasure

if it is a business they should be taxed just like any other business and could potentially use loses if they made them in the future
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Trader » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:37 pm

valleys07 wrote:
Mythical Creature wrote:$2.453 billion dollar turnover for $66 million profit.

Thats only a return of 2.7% unless I am reading it wrong! :?


Thats what i have come up with too MC. Still handy!!!!


Correct, handy indeed.
If you equate it to line betting at $1.90, they are hitting 54 winners to 46 losers, on the number of bets they are having, that's a very good advantage.
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
User avatar
Trader
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4270
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 1:19 pm
Has liked: 61 times
Been liked: 811 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby scoob » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:44 pm

MAY-Z wrote:
Groover wrote:I dont know how the ato can expect any money from a punters club! What would happen if the club lost all its money? Do they cjhae the ato for their money back? IMO its stupid to ask for tax on their winnings...


this is as the ato are considering it to be a business

the things that the ato look at for determining if it is a business are

- whether the bets are conducted in an organised systematic and businesslike way
- the volume and size of the bets
- whether the betting is dependent largely on chance or a reward for skill
- whether they are betting for profit or pleasure

if it is a business they should be taxed just like any other business and could potentially use loses if they made them in the future


FFS now they want to tax our punts! That's fine as long as I call it a business and can claim against all my losses!
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby overloaded » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:54 pm

What a joke. If your good enough to make money on the punt then you should keep it all
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....

I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
overloaded
2009 Punting Comp Winner
 
 
Posts: 6909
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 am
Location: far queue
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Mythical Creature » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:55 pm

valleys07 wrote:
Mythical Creature wrote:$2.453 billion dollar turnover for $66 million profit.

Thats only a return of 2.7% unless I am reading it wrong! :?


Thats what i have come up with too MC. Still handy!!!!


Do you reckon. You wouldn't put $2.5billion in a term deposit at 2.7%, yet there is a higher chance of losing it on the punt. Seems silly to me.
If you don't like it, change it. If you don't want to change it, it can't be that bad!
User avatar
Mythical Creature
Veteran
 
Posts: 3580
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:22 am
Has liked: 189 times
Been liked: 240 times
Grassroots Team: United

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby scoob » Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:01 pm

Mythical Creature wrote:
valleys07 wrote:
Mythical Creature wrote:$2.453 billion dollar turnover for $66 million profit.

Thats only a return of 2.7% unless I am reading it wrong! :?


Thats what i have come up with too MC. Still handy!!!!


Do you reckon. You wouldn't put $2.5billion in a term deposit at 2.7%, yet there is a higher chance of losing it on the punt. Seems silly to me.


They turnover $2.5b, they don't hold $2.5b in cash
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby overloaded » Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Very smart operators and the corporates would hate this group.

Would be interesting to see thier account spreadsheet
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....

I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
overloaded
2009 Punting Comp Winner
 
 
Posts: 6909
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 am
Location: far queue
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby scoob » Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:18 pm

I heard Another Grub was part of this club! :shock:
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby overloaded » Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:27 pm

probably is

I do know the ATO are after him
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....

I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
overloaded
2009 Punting Comp Winner
 
 
Posts: 6909
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 am
Location: far queue
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:01 pm

another case the ATO will lose and deservedly so
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 58230
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 12335 times
Been liked: 3926 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby dedja » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:06 pm

scoob wrote:
Mythical Creature wrote:
valleys07 wrote:
Mythical Creature wrote:$2.453 billion dollar turnover for $66 million profit.

Thats only a return of 2.7% unless I am reading it wrong! :?


Thats what i have come up with too MC. Still handy!!!!


Do you reckon. You wouldn't put $2.5billion in a term deposit at 2.7%, yet there is a higher chance of losing it on the punt. Seems silly to me.


They turnover $2.5b, they don't hold $2.5b in cash


Correct, they just reinvest their winnings (or a significant portion of it).

Good way to launder money apparently ...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.

This post has not been approved by Dave from Alberton.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 21584
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 388 times
Been liked: 1204 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Cash 123 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:21 pm

overloaded wrote:Very smart operators and the corporates would hate this group.

Would be interesting to see thier account spreadsheet


Would be a very big spreadsheet!!
Cash 123
Under 18s
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:28 am
Location: Apollo 13
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:29 pm

i wanna buy shares
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 58230
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 12335 times
Been liked: 3926 times

Re: Syndicate ATO court case

Postby Westsider » Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:55 am

ATO won't lose.

The guy will settle out of the courts. They already have him on record saying it's his primary income. He has (well had) 2 offices dedicated to the business.

It's pretty clear in law if the gambling is a hobby then it won't be taxed. However if it is a business and your primary (or secondary in some cases) source of income, then you should be declaring it.

The corporates loved him, they lavished him with gifts and rebates to get the business.
User avatar
Westsider
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:19 pm
Location: Westsideeeeeeeee
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Next

Board index   General Talk  The Gambling Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |