by Sojourner » Tue May 22, 2012 11:20 am
by story of my life » Tue May 22, 2012 11:51 am
Sojourner wrote:Looking for some of the history on the original move of the Sturt FC away from Unley Oval to Adelaide, does anyone have the year they went to Adleaide and the year they returned to Unley?
What was the then reasoning behind the move to Adelaide Oval by the club? Was it successful initially?
My memories of the earlier games at Unley were long walks to get a park and to get to the ground, massive crowds and a very strong suburban atmosphere. Much of it lost with the move to Adelaide and paid carparking in the parklands and so on. I recall there was a strong groundswell of support amongst Sturt members to get Sturt back to Adelaide and after they got mobilised it was able to be worked out with the council with the temporary fencing and so on leading back to today.
I also recall an incident where a local resident deliberatley walked out onto the ground with his dog during a game which may have been a juniors game? The umpires blew the whistle and held the game up until he crossed over the ground to make his point. I think this then led to a bylaw banning people from the ground whilst organised sport was underway irresepective if a temporary fence was up or not?
Any recollections you have on the move and the move back would be much appreciated!
by Bluedemon » Tue May 22, 2012 4:53 pm
by Pseudo » Tue May 22, 2012 5:07 pm
Bluedemon wrote:the move happened in about the mid 80's,
by on the rails » Tue May 22, 2012 5:08 pm
by FlyingHigh » Tue May 22, 2012 6:30 pm
by Pseudo » Tue May 22, 2012 8:54 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Always thought it was due to the ground rationalistion idea too. Torrens went to Footy Park in 90, Bays 91-92 and Eagles 91-92 as well,
by Spargo » Tue May 22, 2012 9:09 pm
Pseudo wrote:Bluedemon wrote:the move happened in about the mid 80's,
Would've been 1986. I remember Sturt beating Glenelg in the final round of 1985. The game was touted as "the last at Unley Oval".
by dedja » Tue May 22, 2012 9:12 pm
by Bluedemon » Wed May 23, 2012 10:14 am
FlyingHigh wrote:Always thought it was due to the ground rationalistion idea too. Torrens went to Footy Park in 90, Bays 91-92 and Eagles 91-92 as well, but by 92-93 the idea had changed to reconnect with the local area, due of course, to the impact of the AFL.
Did Sturt only look at returning to Unley or did they entertain any other ideas in the late 90's?
Kind of remember a push for Woodville to play their home games at Footy Park in 89 or 90 too, and this may have been going to happen if we didn't merge?
by Look Good In Leather » Wed May 23, 2012 6:07 pm
Bluedemon wrote:the move happened in about the mid 80's, i think it was to do with the SANFL back then looking at ground rationlisation. i remember us going back to Unley in 1997 i reckon with the first game back being against South on a wet day, i got my photo in the local Messenger.
by Mr66 » Wed May 23, 2012 11:19 pm
Spargo wrote:Port also played home matches at Adelaide Oval in the 70's for a season I reckon.
by whufc » Fri May 25, 2012 11:22 am
by JK » Fri May 25, 2012 6:47 pm
on the rails wrote:The NAFC Board in recent years also flirted with the idea of playing there again but alot of protests from the members plus the catering / gate split etc. not being favourable the idea was canned. Thank god again with the soon to be "over used AO" for AFL, where would that have left clubs like Sturt and North had they chosen to stay or relocate to AO in each situation?
by Mr66 » Sat May 26, 2012 12:21 pm
whufc wrote:Probably doesnt need its own topic but was the story behind Sturt and the wooden spoon run. Was it poor management, lack of funds, poor recruiting, terrible coaches etc etc i just remember being a teenager and Sturt were always the easy beats.
by on the rails » Mon May 28, 2012 10:31 am
JK wrote:on the rails wrote:The NAFC Board in recent years also flirted with the idea of playing there again but alot of protests from the members plus the catering / gate split etc. not being favourable the idea was canned. Thank god again with the soon to be "over used AO" for AFL, where would that have left clubs like Sturt and North had they chosen to stay or relocate to AO in each situation?
So what was the board's rationale for the proposed move mate? Hard to see a good reason with the points youve raised above
by JK » Mon May 28, 2012 11:19 am
on the rails wrote:JK wrote:on the rails wrote:The NAFC Board in recent years also flirted with the idea of playing there again but alot of protests from the members plus the catering / gate split etc. not being favourable the idea was canned. Thank god again with the soon to be "over used AO" for AFL, where would that have left clubs like Sturt and North had they chosen to stay or relocate to AO in each situation?
So what was the board's rationale for the proposed move mate? Hard to see a good reason with the points youve raised above
Not sure why the Board thought there was any validity in the move? I know the CEO had a "couldn't be bothered" attitude to our clubs history and the need to ensure you have a home ground / base. He was a big believer in gound rationalisation so the move would have suited him and the board being hosted in comfort in the AO members area!
by on the rails » Mon May 28, 2012 12:46 pm
by robranisgod » Mon May 28, 2012 5:53 pm
on the rails wrote:There was a massive backlash when it was proposed - suprisingly some of the Board at the time are still serving but they were somehow convinced by Elliott and co. that the move was a good idea! In the end the financial deal (including building training facilties etc.) proposed by the SACA wasn't as sweet as it first looked so it was canned on that basis plus the supporter backlash. Believe it or not the same deal was offered to Sturt who also looked briefly at moving back to AO!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |