League Lowest Record

Anything to do with the history of the SANFL

League Lowest Record

Postby spell_check » Mon May 28, 2007 10:36 pm

Apparently Sturt and West only had 22 hit outs between them - 11 each. 22 is a League lowest record for a match.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby therisingblues » Mon May 28, 2007 10:45 pm

Does that mean there were very few ball ups and throw ins, or that the ruckmen were grabbing the pill or missing it altogether at the restarts?
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Hondo » Mon May 28, 2007 10:47 pm

But they kicked 31 goals so there's at least 31 centre bounces?

Lots of fresh-air swishes or a problem with the stats?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby scott » Mon May 28, 2007 10:49 pm

Are these Advertiser stats?
User avatar
scott
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Grahaml » Mon May 28, 2007 10:55 pm

Lots of bad bounces that hit the turf?
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby godoubleblues » Mon May 28, 2007 11:06 pm

the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:
User avatar
godoubleblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6063
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Littlehampton
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Millicent

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby spell_check » Mon May 28, 2007 11:07 pm

scott wrote:Are these Advertiser stats?


Yes.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby heater31 » Mon May 28, 2007 11:10 pm

godoubleblues wrote:the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:



Is the centre circle at unley on the cricket pitch square? if so a bloody cricket ball struggles to get above shin height sometimes so how do you expect a football to be bounced correctly
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16674
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1290 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby bulldogproud » Mon May 28, 2007 11:42 pm

Those stats could well be very accurate. To be counted as a hitout, the tap needs to be effective and benefit that ruckman's team. In the 2005 GF, almost all of the hitouts gained by the Eagles ruckmen should not have been counted as they were swallowed up by the Central running fleet.
Cheers!
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: West Beach
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 401 times
Grassroots Team: Imperials

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby spell_check » Tue May 29, 2007 12:00 am

My opinion of a hit out is different - it should be who won the ruck duel. Where it went is what the stat 'Clearances' are for or effective/ineffective hit outs.

I'd take the club stats as accurate anyday.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Jimmy » Tue May 29, 2007 12:55 am

godoubleblues wrote:the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:


yeah, i remember on the radio the commentators saying, oh he has to throw it up now.

Might as well just throw it up, i like the bounce but if they cant do it right then ffs, throw it up.
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby scott » Tue May 29, 2007 1:04 am

bulldogproud wrote:To be counted as a hitout, the tap needs to be effective and benefit that ruckman's team.


Those are called "hit outs to advantage". A hit out simply is that - a hit out. Where it goes next is irrelevant. Though, this is all up to interpretation on who counts the statistics. Roughly one in every four hit outs at AFL level goes to advantage.

And since the OP is quoting Advertiser stats, triple them and then you probably have a more accurate figure.
User avatar
scott
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby smithy » Tue May 29, 2007 1:23 am

Jimmy wrote:
godoubleblues wrote:the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:


yeah, i remember on the radio the commentators saying, oh he has to throw it up now.

Might as well just throw it up, i like the bounce but if they cant do it right then ffs, throw it up.


Field umpires on the AfL's list MUST bounce the ball in the SANFL.

Those that aren't can do as they please.
smithy
 

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Jimmy » Tue May 29, 2007 2:42 am

smithy wrote:
Jimmy wrote:
godoubleblues wrote:the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:


yeah, i remember on the radio the commentators saying, oh he has to throw it up now.

Might as well just throw it up, i like the bounce but if they cant do it right then ffs, throw it up.


Field umpires on the AfL's list MUST bounce the ball in the SANFL.

Those that aren't can do as they please.


yeah, that sounds familiar....bastards...stuffing it up....afl should just throw it up then ;)
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby sturt1 » Tue May 29, 2007 5:27 am

godoubleblues wrote:the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:



Agreed, what a joke. There was atleast 7 times that they recalled it and a couple where they couldnt be bothered. I wonder if the umpires do any of their training at the oval they will be umpiring at in the week leading up to the game.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby johntheclaret » Tue May 29, 2007 6:06 am

sturt1 wrote:
godoubleblues wrote:the bouncing by the umpires was atrocious
I reckon every second centre bounce was shite and recalled by the umpire for him to throw up
they may as well throw them up and stop wasting time, it must frustrate the players, especially the ruckmen who put all that energy in only for it to be thrown up again :roll:



Agreed, what a joke. There was atleast 7 times that they recalled it and a couple where they couldnt be bothered. I wonder if the umpires do any of their training at the oval they will be umpiring at in the week leading up to the game.


Sorry Sturt1, but why would the umps need to train to bounce the ball? Surely they should be clever enough to judge the type of surface and decide whether to throw or bounce.. even my mother can bounce a ball :roll: :ANAL:
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Mr66 » Tue May 29, 2007 8:34 am

hondo71 wrote:But they kicked 31 goals so there's at least 31 centre bounces?

Lots of fresh-air swishes or a problem with the stats?


35 if you count the start of each quarter.
If one person does it, it's insanity. If millions do it, it's religion.

http://www.beyondblue.org.au
User avatar
Mr66
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4392
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:08 pm
Location: Where the Streets Have No Name
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Ecky » Tue May 29, 2007 11:29 am

bulldogproud wrote:To be counted as a hitout, the tap needs to be effective and benefit that ruckman's team.


Yeah, this is the definition the Advertiser stats people say they use. But the problem is that it is far too open to interpretation, and with different people taking the stats at different grounds, it makes comparing hitout stats between teams/games basically meaningless. If you want to measure how effective teams are at stoppages you need to measure clearances. You need to keep the human element out of stats-recording as much as possible, and the only way to do this with hitouts is to record all hitouts.

Yet another example of how the Advertiser stats are letting the SANFL Statistics community (i.e. Spelly :) ) down.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
User avatar
Ecky
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:26 am
Location: Wherever the stats are
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 78 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby Blue Boy » Tue May 29, 2007 1:34 pm

From memory the ball was kept in play most of the day and I cant remember to many ball ups around the ground - the quaters didnt seem to go that long really.

There were a few recalls - I rekon one umpire had real trouble with it and then hit the ground whilst running backwards @ one stage to every ones delight .
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: League Lowest Record

Postby XXXXRooster » Tue May 29, 2007 10:31 pm

Some statsmen must count them different ways, guess they dont count them the same as the days where Frank Spiel would get 700 hit outs in a season!!
SANFL-NO THEATREGOERS ALLOWED!!!!
User avatar
XXXXRooster
Member
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Bouncing Around
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL History Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |