GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:13 amby Ian
Spelly,
From the "most dissapointing thread",
First of all, which teams have made a GF one year, then not played finals the following year?
Then secondly, which of those teams made the GF the next year?
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:35 amby am Bays
Glenelg 1990 2nd, 1991 - 6th, 1992 2nd
North 1987 1st, 1988 7th, 1989 2nd
not surprised you didn't get that one Ian, you've probably wiped 1989 from your consciousness like I have with 1990...
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:02 pmby spell_check
(Since 1931)
Norwood - 1933 2nd, 1934 7th
Glenelg - 1934 1st, 1935 8th
Sturt - 1936 2nd, 1937 6th
Torrens - 1939 2nd, 1940 7th
South - 1940 2nd, 1941 5th
Sturt - 1941 2nd, 1945 5th
Torrens - 1945 1st, 1946 5th
North - 1949 1st, 1950 5th
Norwood - 1950 1st, 1951 5th
North - 1952 1st, 1953 5th
West - 1954 2nd, 1955 7th
North - 1960 1st, 1961 5th
North - 1963 2nd, 1964 8th
Port - 1968 2nd, 1969 6th
Glenelg - 1970 2nd, 1971 6th
North - 1973 2nd, 1974 7th
Sturt - 1976 1st, 1977 7th
Sturt - 1978 2nd, 1979 9th
South - 1979 2nd, 1980 7th
Glenelg - 1982 2nd, 1983 7th
West - 1983 1st, 1984 6th
Sturt - 1983 2nd, 1984 7th
Port - 1984 2nd, 1985 7th
North - 1987 1st, 1988 6th
Glenelg - 1990 2nd, 1991 6th
West - 1991 2nd, 1992 6th
Eagles - 1994 2nd, 1995 8th
North - 2007 2nd, 2008 6th/7th
North - 1949 1st, 1950 5th, 1951 2nd
West - 1954 2nd, 1955 7th, 1956 2nd
Sturt - 1976 1st, 1977 7th, 1978 2nd
North - 1987 1st, 1988 6th, 1989 2nd
Glenelg - 1990 2nd, 1991 6th, 1992 2nd
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:28 pmby Booney
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Glenelg 1990 2nd, 1991 - 6th, 1992 2nd
North 1987 1st, 1988 7th, 1989 2nd
not surprised you didn't get that one Ian, you've probably wiped 1989 from your consciousness like I have with 1990...
Did someone say 1989 ,1990?
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:49 pmby gadj1976
spell_check wrote:(Since 1931)
Norwood - 1933 2nd, 1934 7th
Glenelg - 1934 1st, 1935 8th
Sturt - 1936 2nd, 1937 6th
Torrens - 1939 2nd, 1940 7th
South - 1940 2nd, 1941 5th
Sturt - 1941 2nd, 1945 5th
Torrens - 1945 1st, 1946 5th
North - 1949 1st, 1950 5th
Norwood - 1950 1st, 1951 5th
North - 1952 1st, 1953 5th
West - 1954 2nd, 1955 7th
North - 1960 1st, 1961 5th
North - 1963 2nd, 1964 8th
Port - 1968 2nd, 1969 6th
Glenelg - 1970 2nd, 1971 6th
North - 1973 2nd, 1974 7th
Sturt - 1976 1st, 1977 7th
Sturt - 1978 2nd, 1979 9th
South - 1979 2nd, 1980 7th
Glenelg - 1982 2nd, 1983 7th
West - 1983 1st, 1984 6th
Sturt - 1983 2nd, 1984 7th
Port - 1984 2nd, 1985 7th
North - 1987 1st, 1988 6th
Glenelg - 1990 2nd, 1991 6th
West - 1991 2nd, 1992 6th
Eagles - 1994 2nd, 1995 8th
North - 2007 2nd, 2008 6th/7th
North - 1949 1st, 1950 5th, 1951 2nd
West - 1954 2nd, 1955 7th, 1956 2nd
Sturt - 1976 1st, 1977 7th, 1978 2nd
North - 1987 1st, 1988 6th, 1989 2nd
Glenelg - 1990 2nd, 1991 6th, 1992 2nd
Geez, that's tough that we qualified for this listing with the war on in between
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:06 pmby spell_check
That was a bit technical, I agree there.
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:26 pmby Ian
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Glenelg 1990 2nd, 1991 - 6th, 1992 2nd
North 1987 1st, 1988 7th, 1989 2nd
not surprised you didn't get that one Ian, you've probably wiped 1989 from your consciousness like I have with 1990...
I knew it, tried to erase it from my mind, but................................... wasn't sure about others though
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:50 pmby Leaping Lindner
spell_check wrote:North - 1949 1st, 1950 5th, 1951 2nd
And to cap that off they came first in 1952. Ken Farmer's coaching recording reads 4 seasons for three Grand Finals and two flags. Amazing.
Re: GF - Miss Finals - GF
Posted:
Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:55 pmby am Bays
Leaping Lindner wrote:spell_check wrote:North - 1949 1st, 1950 5th, 1951 2nd
And to cap that off they came first in 1952. Ken Farmer's coaching recording reads 4 seasons for three Grand Finals and two flags. Amazing.
That is amazing LL, why didn't he go on in 53 LL?
Was their an undeground cell on the that new thingymejiggy known as the wireless that was whiteanting him? (thats a joke joyce)