SA Footy

Do you blokes keep crowd Stats?

Would like to know how the SANFL is travelling compared to previous years - with the fine weather and close comp I would have thought this year is stacking up reasonabley well?

Now that Im typing this Im thinking Phil used to post have these stats etc...I know he reads this so might like to post them here

cheers

Code: Select all

1997   82   263950   3218.90
1998   87   320912   3688.64
1999   88   281168   3195.09
2000   90   266982   2966.47
2001   90   279570   3106.33
2002   90   279113   3101.26
2003   90   260137   2890.41
2004   90   253097   2812.19
2005   90   246910   2743.44
2006   86   247004   2872.14

Keep in mind 1997-99 had the curtain raisers, so the numbers are less than 90.

Thanks Spelly - looks like it will be the best year for 4 years, thought it might be better though esp with the poor crowd pulling Westies down the bottom...would be interested in the individual clubs break down if you have them

I don't think the small increase in crowds this year is anything to get too excited about.

The increase can be mainly put down to 3 factors

Adelaide's driest winter on record
The novelty of having Saturday Night games at Elizabeth (which may well wear off, especially with certain recent publicity...)
A 25% increase in crowds at Glenelg Oval due to Glenelg's improved form, which is probably something else which is not sustainable.

The SANFL and the clubs need to keep promoting the League and not get complacent - I don't believe there has been any real, permanent increase in interest in the competition this year.

Dutchy wrote:Thanks Spelly - looks like it will be the best year for 4 years, thought it might be better though esp with the poor crowd pulling Westies down the bottom...would be interested in the individual clubs break down if you have them

I don;t have the individual crowd records off hand, that chart I did have made - Phil has the different teams I think.

And Ecky is right, for any real increase in attendance to match the three criteria shown, it would have had to been over 3000 per match.

spell_check wrote:

Code: Select all

1997   82   263950   3218.90
1998   87   320912   3688.64
1999   88   281168   3195.09
2000   90   266982   2966.47
2001   90   279570   3106.33
2002   90   279113   3101.26
2003   90   260137   2890.41
2004   90   253097   2812.19
2005   90   246910   2743.44
2006   86   247004   2872.14

Keep in mind 1997-99 had the curtain raisers, so the numbers are less than 90.

Can you explain what each column represents?
I understand the 1st one...

Punk Rooster wrote:

spell_check wrote:

Code: Select all

1997   82   263950   3218.90
1998   87   320912   3688.64
1999   88   281168   3195.09
2000   90   266982   2966.47
2001   90   279570   3106.33
2002   90   279113   3101.26
2003   90   260137   2890.41
2004   90   253097   2812.19
2005   90   246910   2743.44
2006   86   247004   2872.14

Keep in mind 1997-99 had the curtain raisers, so the numbers are less than 90.

Can you explain what each column represents?
I understand the 1st one...

Would be year, number of games in the year, total attendance, aver per game.

Yes.

South got 4000 to a Sunday game at Noarlunga, the Bays have also done well. I think there could be signs of added interest....

south should play more sundy games as that would allow players in the local SFL to attend matches.

I think Glenelg should also play on sundays as they have had 2 good crowds on the 2 games that they had.