by Rushby Hinds » Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:43 am
by Leaping Lindner » Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:07 pm
Borat wrote:LL or someone, can u remember this?
Many moons ago Super was found guilty of attempted striking (he missed) and missed both the Bays losing finals that year.
(I can't remember if Glenelg took it to the supreme court.....)
I can remember the Bays investigated whether they could claim both the magoos and league games as a match each, but that didn't work.
by Magpiespower » Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:40 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote: Graham Campbell to this day claims it cost them a flag.
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:01 pm
by Magpiespower » Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:14 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:And there I was thinking it was Norwood who cost them the flag
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:06 am
by Pseudo » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:50 am
Wedgie wrote:If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:53 am
Pseudo wrote:Wedgie wrote:If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.
Carey's charge was lesser than Cupido's. Therefore if Cupido got a game, Super should have got a slap on the wrist.
by Pseudo » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:09 am
Wedgie wrote:I disagree, I think attempting to hit someone as opposed to not hitting someone nor attempting to hit someone is definately a much worse charge.
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:12 am
Pseudo wrote:Wedgie wrote:I disagree, I think attempting to hit someone as opposed to not hitting someone nor attempting to hit someone is definately a much worse charge.
So Kewpie doll was up on a charge of not-striking? That vile Panther did, with forethought and malice, not-hit McConnell?
The vicious bastard! May the law show him no mercy!
by Magpiespower » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:54 am
Wedgie wrote:...in the 00s players can rape, pillage and murder and not get a game.
by Booney » Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:17 pm
Pseudo wrote:Wedgie wrote:If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.
Carey's charge was lesser than Cupido's. Therefore if Cupido got a game, Super should have got a slap on the wrist.
In a perfect world Cupido would have got a reprimand, and Super wouldn't even have fronted the tribunal.
by oldfella » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:03 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:08 pm
oldfella wrote:Correct me if I am wrong but didnt Carey get reported the year before or after for striking around finals time - found guilty but repremanded -- Seem to recall at time discussion that attempting was more serious than actual
by leftlegger » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:24 am
by matt » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:49 pm
by stampy » Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:31 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |