Peter Carey suspension for attempted striking

Anything to do with the history of the SANFL

Peter Carey suspension for attempted striking

Postby Rushby Hinds » Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:43 am

LL or someone, can u remember this?


Many moons ago Super was found guilty of attempted striking (he missed) and missed both the Bays losing finals that year.


(I can't remember if Glenelg took it to the supreme court.....)

I can remember the Bays investigated whether they could claim both the magoos and league games as a match each, but that didn't work.
User avatar
Rushby Hinds
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Peter Carey suspension for attempted striking

Postby Leaping Lindner » Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:07 pm

Borat wrote:LL or someone, can u remember this?


Many moons ago Super was found guilty of attempted striking (he missed) and missed both the Bays losing finals that year.


(I can't remember if Glenelg took it to the supreme court.....)

I can remember the Bays investigated whether they could claim both the magoos and league games as a match each, but that didn't work.


1984 during the Qualifying Final against Central. He then missed the 2nd Semi against Port and Prelim against Norwood.
I also can't remember if the Bays took it further (eg: Supreme Court) but I know that Graham Campbell to this day claims it cost them a flag. Probably the most ridiculous charge ever invented "attempting"(WTF) to strike.
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Peter Carey suspension for attempted striking

Postby Magpiespower » Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:40 pm

Leaping Lindner wrote: Graham Campbell to this day claims it cost them a flag.


Inaccurate b@stards cost us a flag.

11.23

FFS!
User avatar
Magpiespower
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6292
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:12 am
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 125 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:01 pm

And there I was thinking it was Norwood who cost them the flag :)
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Magpiespower » Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:14 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:And there I was thinking it was Norwood who cost them the flag :)


Don't remind me.

Russell Ebert is culpable as well.

But gee, we had the wood on Glenelg that year - 4, zip.
User avatar
Magpiespower
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6292
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:12 am
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 125 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Postby Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:06 am

If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Pseudo » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:50 am

Wedgie wrote:If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.

Carey's charge was lesser than Cupido's. Therefore if Cupido got a game, Super should have got a slap on the wrist.

In a perfect world Cupido would have got a reprimand, and Super wouldn't even have fronted the tribunal.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12217
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1650 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Postby Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:53 am

Pseudo wrote:
Wedgie wrote:If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.

Carey's charge was lesser than Cupido's. Therefore if Cupido got a game, Super should have got a slap on the wrist.


I disagree, I think attempting to hit someone as opposed to not hitting someone nor attempting to hit someone is definately a much worse charge.
I saw the Carey incident and I saw the Cupido incident, both live and both on TV and both from a non-biased point of view (if anything I was hoping for a Glenelg win last week).
Not even comparable, you're clutching at straws or are so biased that you shouldn't be commenting on either incident if you claim otherwise.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Pseudo » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:09 am

Wedgie wrote:I disagree, I think attempting to hit someone as opposed to not hitting someone nor attempting to hit someone is definately a much worse charge.

So Kewpie doll was up on a charge of not-striking? That vile Panther did, with forethought and malice, not-hit McConnell?

The vicious bastard! May the law show him no mercy! :lol:
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12217
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1650 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Postby Wedgie » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:12 am

Pseudo wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I disagree, I think attempting to hit someone as opposed to not hitting someone nor attempting to hit someone is definately a much worse charge.

So Kewpie doll was up on a charge of not-striking? That vile Panther did, with forethought and malice, not-hit McConnell?

The vicious bastard! May the law show him no mercy! :lol:


I don't care what he was up on a charge of, he did nothing nor attempt to do anything, anyone that calls that a strike is following the wrong game or has vested interest in not liking South.
I don't care what charge and umpire made nor do I care about what resulted in that charge when it comes to assessing the 2 incidents.
Common sense is the only thing Im interested in when it comes to comparing the 2 incidents.

And that doesn't even take into account that players regularly got games for attempting to strike in the early 80s where in the 00s players can rape, pillage and murder and not get a game.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Magpiespower » Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:54 am

Wedgie wrote:...in the 00s players can rape, pillage and murder and not get a game.


Can the tribunal suspend players for the things they do off the ground? :wink:
User avatar
Magpiespower
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6292
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:12 am
Location: Salisbury
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 125 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Postby Booney » Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:17 pm

Pseudo wrote:
Wedgie wrote:If Cupido's "hit" got 1 game then Carey's attempt should have got 18 games.
Can't have it both way lads.

Carey's charge was lesser than Cupido's. Therefore if Cupido got a game, Super should have got a slap on the wrist.

In a perfect world Cupido would have got a reprimand, and Super wouldn't even have fronted the tribunal.


Not that we want to transcend through different era's lads.Wonder if Cupiedough even knows who Super Carey is?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61452
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8161 times
Been liked: 11889 times

Postby oldfella » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:03 pm

Correct me if I am wrong but didnt Carey get reported the year before or after for striking around finals time - found guilty but repremanded -- Seem to recall at time discussion that attempting was more serious than actual :shock:
oldfella
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:47 pm
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 14 times

Postby Wedgie » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:08 pm

oldfella wrote:Correct me if I am wrong but didnt Carey get reported the year before or after for striking around finals time - found guilty but repremanded -- Seem to recall at time discussion that attempting was more serious than actual :shock:


Yep, it makes sense though if you put some thought into it.
Attempted murder is more serious than tapping someone on the shoulder.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby oldfella » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:20 pm

LOL
oldfella
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:47 pm
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 14 times

Postby leftlegger » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:24 am

geez, i am struggling to follow your logic on this one wedgie
User avatar
leftlegger
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: PHOS Camden

Postby matt » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:49 pm

The funny thing is that if 'attempted striking' was still a suspendable offence then Cupido would definitely have gone, iirc. From the reply on the news following the verdict he definitely took a swing at McConnell, and a big one* at that.
matt
Under 16s
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:49 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby stampy » Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:31 pm

the last minor round game of 1985 for smacking johnny paynter i reckon and supe got off and he admitted later he was as guilty as sin :D
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9064
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 76 times
Been liked: 378 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach


Board index   Football  SANFL History Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |