SA Footy

Posted: **Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:41 pm**

SANFL > WAFL > VFL > AFL Crap

Great stuff Spelly.

Posted: **Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:47 pm**

Wedgie wrote:SANFL > WAFL > VFL > AFL Crap

Great stuff Spelly.

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:54 pm**

More awesome stats, mate.

That there are twice as many AFL games as SANFL and WAFL, magnifies those differencs even more. Also in the AFL there were heaps more rushed points adding to the scoring shots this year - saw a few in the SANFL this year, but not nearly as many.

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:38 pm**

Cracking work spelly. All those comparative numbers look good for the SANFL except for the average margin ... 46 points is a lot! I guess there has been a few enormous blow outs this year which have propelled that average a bit.

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:46 pm**

It just shows that this league is the best there is around.
With the Ave Margin, it doesn't help when Sturt have been playing like crap this year.

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:50 pm**

The average losing margin Sturt had was 66.47.

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:06 pm**

spell_check wrote:The average losing margin Sturt had was 66.47.

OUCH!
Do you have comparitive stats of North's effort in 2003 as we got thumped by 100+ quite often?

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:54 pm**

Wedgie wrote:
spell_check wrote:The average losing margin Sturt had was 66.47.

OUCH!
Do you have comparitive stats of North's effort in 2003 as we got thumped by 100+ quite often?

60.46.

Posted: **Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:39 pm**

spell_check wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
spell_check wrote:The average losing margin Sturt had was 66.47.

OUCH!
Do you have comparitive stats of North's effort in 2003 as we got thumped by 100+ quite often?

60.46.

Crikey, I knew it was a bad year for Sturt but I didn't think anyone would lose worse than we did in the worst year of our history.
Thanks again Spelly, great work.

SA Footy

Comparison of scoring between the AFL and the three leagues

Comparison of scoring between the AFL and the three leagues