Page 1 of 1

28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:45 pm
by spell_check
Is an equal record for most behinds in a match by North. It matches 20.28 (148) against West 4.9 (33) in Round 17 1974.
It is the 2nd highest behinds kicked against Port, 15.29 (119) by Glenelg to Port 20.10 (130) in Round 20 1974.
The most number of behinds against Port at Alberton previously was 20.24 (144) by West Torrens to Port 15.14 (104), Round 5 1974.
Norths' previous highest behind tally against Port was 14.21 (105) to 17.13 (115), Round 1 1992 at Football Park. At Alberton it was 15.20 (110) to 9.7 (61), Round 4 1947.
This is only the second time the score 18.28 (136) has been posted in one match by a team. The other one was in Round 2 1967, by Norwood against Woodville 11.12 (78) at Norwood.
The last time a team kicked 28 behinds or more was Sturt who also kicked 28 behinds, 19.28 (142) vs West 19.8 (122) in Round 5 1984, at Adelaide.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:01 pm
by Hondo
It wouldn't be Port's biggest loss at Alberton but where does that result for North rank all-time v Port at Alberton? Top 10?

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:13 pm
by RoosterMarty
hondo71 wrote:It wouldn't be Port's biggest loss at Alberton but where does that result for North rank all-time v Port at Alberton? Top 10?



I think we won by more last year, it was about 82 points or something but I could be wrong. It would certainly be up in the top 10 I would think.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:22 pm
by goraw
spell_check wrote:Is an equal record for most behinds in a match by North. It matches 20.28 (148) against West 4.9 (33) in Round 17 1974.
It is the 2nd highest behinds kicked against Port, 15.29 (119) by Glenelg to Port 20.10 (130) in Round 20 1974.
The most number of behinds against Port at Alberton previously was 20.24 (144) by West Torrens to Port 15.14 (104), Round 5 1974.
Norths' previous highest behind tally against Port was 14.21 (105) to 17.13 (115), Round 1 1992 at Football Park. At Alberton it was 15.20 (110) to 9.7 (61), Round 4 1947.
This is only the second time the score 18.28 (136) has been posted in one match by a team. The other one was in Round 2 1967, by Norwood against Woodville 11.12 (78) at Norwood.
The last time a team kicked 28 behinds or more was Sturt who also kicked 28 behinds, 19.28 (142) vs West 19.8 (122) in Round 5 1984, at Adelaide.


what a guru :shock:

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:26 pm
by Mr66
It adds up to fifty behinds kicked if you count the Port players
own backsides. :lol:

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:39 pm
by Wedgie
We were actually barracking for a couple of points late in the last quarter to hit the 30 point mark, we booed when Younie kicked a goal.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:39 pm
by spell_check
RoosterMarty wrote:
hondo71 wrote:It wouldn't be Port's biggest loss at Alberton but where does that result for North rank all-time v Port at Alberton? Top 10?



I think we won by more last year, it was about 82 points or something but I could be wrong. It would certainly be up in the top 10 I would think.


Equal 4th and a record for North, behind:
86 pts, Sturt 24.11 (155) to 9.15 (69), Round 14 1973
85 pts, Glenelg 26.9 (165) to 11.15 (81), Round 16 1993
75 pts, West 24.12 (156) to 12.9 (81), Round 15 1985
74 pts, Glenelg 17.16 (118) to 6.8 (44), Round 1 1950

The match last year was the previous record for North, 72 points - 22.14 (146) to 11.8 (74) in Round 16.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:47 pm
by Hondo
OMG!

Why oh why didn't they have that stat at the ground ... only 5 points (1 goal) away from Port's biggest ever loss at Alberton!!!!

They North fans could have yelled out to the players .. Jars ... someone

:D

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:49 pm
by Wedgie
hondo71 wrote:OMG!

Why oh why didn't they have that stat at the ground ... only 5 points (1 goal) away from Port's biggest ever loss at Alberton!!!!

:D


We're saving that for next year, we've progressively beaten them by more each year at Alberton since Jarman took over. :wink:

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:52 pm
by Hondo
Wedgie wrote:
hondo71 wrote:OMG!

Why oh why didn't they have that stat at the ground ... only 5 points (1 goal) away from Port's biggest ever loss at Alberton!!!!

:D


We're saving that for next year, we've progressively beaten them by more each year at Alberton since Jarman took over. :wink:


We have to make sure we remember then ....

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:12 pm
by spell_check
Also:

46 scoring shots is a record by a team against Port at Alberton. The previous was 44 by West Torrens in the match stated in the 1st post. The previous best by North was 40 - 21.19 (145) vs 15.14 (104) Round 13 1972.
It is also a record for the most scoring shots by North against Port. The Round 13 1972 match was the record.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:22 pm
by magpie in the 80's
spell_check wrote:Also:

46 scoring shots is a record by a team against Port at Alberton. The previous was 44 by West Torrens in the match stated in the 1st post. The previous best by North was 40 - 21.19 (145) vs 15.14 (104) Round 13 1972.
It is also a record for the most scoring shots by North against Port. The Round 13 1972 match was the record.


you absolutely astound me spelly with your stats. you remind me of those commericials for tax returns when you appear to have found YET another stat that no one has heard before. can imagine you at your computer going YES!!!! with a clenched fist :D

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:34 pm
by therisingblues
Spelly doesn't really exist MIT80's. He IS a computer with a built in clenched fist that he waves whenever he discovers a new stat.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:37 pm
by Hasbeen
spell_check wrote:Also:

46 scoring shots is a record by a team against Port at Alberton. The previous was 44 by West Torrens in the match stated in the 1st post. The previous best by North was 40 - 21.19 (145) vs 15.14 (104) Round 13 1972.
It is also a record for the most scoring shots by North against Port. The Round 13 1972 match was the record.

Thanks Bruce thats some speeecial stats.
The 3rd kick in the 2nd quarter, how does that rate in distance kicked at Alberton?

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:38 pm
by magpie in the 80's
therisingblues wrote:Spelly doesn't really exist MIT80's. He IS a computer with a built in clenched fist that he waves whenever he discovers a new stat.


:shock: :finga: (lol)

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:41 pm
by spell_check
magpie in the 80's wrote:
spell_check wrote:Also:

46 scoring shots is a record by a team against Port at Alberton. The previous was 44 by West Torrens in the match stated in the 1st post. The previous best by North was 40 - 21.19 (145) vs 15.14 (104) Round 13 1972.
It is also a record for the most scoring shots by North against Port. The Round 13 1972 match was the record.


you absolutely astound me spelly with your stats. you remind me of those commericials for tax returns when you appear to have found YET another stat that no one has heard before. can imagine you at your computer going YES!!!! with a clenched fist :D


lol, I like that post. :)

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:07 pm
by Interceptor
What is Port's worst ever season at Alberton spelly?
Already 3 losses there so far this year.

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:44 pm
by spell_check
Interceptor wrote:What is Port's worst ever season at Alberton spelly?
Already 3 losses there so far this year.

1983 - 2 wins 6 losses

Other seasons Port have lost 4 or more matches at Alberton are:

1948 - 3 wins 5 losses
1949 - 3 wins 4 losses
1969 - 4 wins 5 losses
1985 - 3 wins 4 losses
1991 - 3 wins 5 losses

Re: 28 behinds

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:29 pm
by eaglehaslanded
Let's just imagine what would have happened if North kicked straight. The result was embarrasing enough as it was but if North kicked straight they could have potentialy won by 130+. On a day we all thought the Pies would come out fighting in the memory of Von Williams they showed nothing. You should be absolutely ashamed Magpies.