Re: ASCA
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 9:43 am
Not sure how they could lose with all those inspirational facebook posts
Booney wrote:Train on the oval before hand?
Trader wrote:Granted I don't follow ASCA all that closely, and Sutton Derby sound like a difficult club based on that letter posted, however, I must admit without knowing the details, I can sympathise with them a little.
If it's their home fixture, and their ground (billabong oval) was available, why did the association move the game on them?
Why did the away team (ICC) get to request it being moved?
Sure, talk of training on an oval first, and fans at lower grade cricket, is clearly a long bow from the SD lads, but the underlying sense that they should be allowed to host their home game does seem reasonable.
The Bedge wrote:Trader wrote:Granted I don't follow ASCA all that closely, and Sutton Derby sound like a difficult club based on that letter posted, however, I must admit without knowing the details, I can sympathise with them a little.
If it's their home fixture, and their ground (billabong oval) was available, why did the association move the game on them?
Why did the away team (ICC) get to request it being moved?
Sure, talk of training on an oval first, and fans at lower grade cricket, is clearly a long bow from the SD lads, but the underlying sense that they should be allowed to host their home game does seem reasonable.
Believe there were concerns around the ground having suitable facilities i.e. toilets
Booney wrote:None?
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:None?
LG Perriam Memorial Oval - looking on google maps, doesn't look like there is anything - shelter, parking, toilets.
The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:None?
LG Perriam Memorial Oval - looking on google maps, doesn't look like there is anything - shelter, parking, toilets.
footy1992 wrote:It’s at St Peter’s surrounded by a billabong!Barkeroo wrote:Where is Billabong oval?
whitepointers wrote:I heard Flaggies forfeit was due to 10 players going on a footy trip so may be a once off hopefully
The Bedge wrote:Trader wrote:Granted I don't follow ASCA all that closely, and Sutton Derby sound like a difficult club based on that letter posted, however, I must admit without knowing the details, I can sympathise with them a little.
If it's their home fixture, and their ground (billabong oval) was available, why did the association move the game on them?
Why did the away team (ICC) get to request it being moved?
Sure, talk of training on an oval first, and fans at lower grade cricket, is clearly a long bow from the SD lads, but the underlying sense that they should be allowed to host their home game does seem reasonable.
Believe there were concerns around the ground having suitable facilities i.e. toilets
SecretInformant wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:None?
LG Perriam Memorial Oval - looking on google maps, doesn't look like there is anything - shelter, parking, toilets.
It was good enough for Section 3 last year.
Armchair expert wrote:Not sure how they could lose with all those inspirational facebook posts
Correct mate, got the news last night about them forfeiting again.Keefy wrote:I see Flagstaff Hill fofeited in Section 9 again
Sent from my SM-S906E using Tapatalk
whitepointers wrote:Sutton had 8 players make the journey to porties today.
Very disappointing considering we erected a temporary grandstand to cater for all the travelling support