SA Footy

For anybody wanting to see what Sutton Derby are about:

https://www.youtube.com/live/Rp0VIyKuIqc?feature=shared

The Moose wrote:For anybody wanting to see what Sutton Derby are about:

https://www.youtube.com/live/Rp0VIyKuIqc?feature=shared

Looking for a laugh today. Will tune in

Coromandel look like they are sooking it up I can only assume SD are on about 350 or so


SD bat pissed off he got out, can only assume he was on 199 maybe Coromandels first wicket

You wouldn’t want to be Coromandel and get rinsed by Sutton Derby. They have been trolling their Facebook posts something chronic…

According to PlayHQ SD bowled out for 48 and second innings 6/55

Coro declared 3/136

Odds SD don't rock up next weekend?

Armchair expert wrote:Odds SD don't rock up next weekend?

Odds they won’t make Christmas?

Clubs should be asking for reduced team fees or waived umpire fees next year as punishment for the association for allowing this to happen.

Deduct points from WYC for every performance SD put up like today as well. Their team's aren't looking too different from last year anyways and as said who hasn't lost a few players this year.

footy1992 wrote:You wouldn’t want to be Coromandel and get rinsed by Sutton Derby. They have been trolling their Facebook posts something chronic…

Good on ya champ. Just having a bit of cheeky fun. You can jog on now. Back to your clubrooms. 10 of the Sutton Derby lads were decent fellas, just playing way out of their depth because of one bloke. We had a good time with them when they were out there with us. Plenty of laughs were had on both sides.

Anyone know if Flagstaff Hill B grade got a team up in section 9 yesterday.
No scores or teams nominated for either team for the game against Mitchell Park.
Surely if they forfeit 3 games in a row they get tossed from the division.

Moe wrote:Anyone know if Flagstaff Hill B grade got a team up in section 9 yesterday.
No scores or teams nominated for either team for the game against Mitchell Park.
Surely if they forfeit 3 games in a row they get tossed from the division.

They forfeited again

Sent from my SM-S906E using Tapatalk

Keefy wrote:

Moe wrote:Anyone know if Flagstaff Hill B grade got a team up in section 9 yesterday.
No scores or teams nominated for either team for the game against Mitchell Park.
Surely if they forfeit 3 games in a row they get tossed from the division.

They forfeited again

Sent from my SM-S906E using Tapatalk

They are a joke.
Boot them

Tight_Lines wrote:Clubs should be asking for reduced team fees or waived umpire fees next year as punishment for the association for allowing this to happen.

Deduct points from WYC for every performance SD put up like today as well. Their team's aren't looking too different from last year anyways and as said who hasn't lost a few players this year.

Sutton Derby rocked up with 6 players week 2 and played cricket for 18 minutes.

storyoftheyear wrote:Sutton Derby rocked up with 6 players week 2 and played cricket for 18 minutes.

So what you are saying the umpire earnt his money. Not a bad rate of pay for 18 minutes. Can I umpire them next round?

storyoftheyear wrote:Sutton Derby rocked up with 6 players week 2 and played cricket for 18 minutes.

How long does the association hold out on this?

Booney wrote:

storyoftheyear wrote:Sutton Derby rocked up with 6 players week 2 and played cricket for 18 minutes.

How long does the association hold out on this?

I think the association has an out this week. Sutton Derby ended up making more than Plympton Footballers did. They'll be able to point to that and say there are several similar results in the same round.

Plympton have several players that have performed in Section 1 over a long period of time, are they one of the weaker sides this year? Absolutely, however Plympton having an off game should in no way be compared to the farce that is SD.

If the executive use that as an excuse to not take action it will only further prove their ignorance. They dropped that ball big time and rather than do anything about it they are sticking their head in the sand.

Round 1 - The ground controversy and letter
Round 2 - Only 8 players and not filling out the score book with most players leaving immediately after getting out.
Round 3 - Only 6 players attend the ground on week 2

See a bit of a pattern? SD are a shambles.

It's the rolling up with 6 or 8 players that is the most worrying, might be 4 in a week or two, then what?

They were 6/55 still 100 or so behind

I'm not surprised they got 6 people rocking up