Page 54 of 246

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:52 am
by the milky bar kid
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Don't worry, we have all of those Church boys' names and phone numbers ....big recruiting drive for next season.


If they are playing on hard wicket, is it really cricket? :-k :lol:

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:05 pm
by Harry49
Did the ATCA v A&SCA game go ahead yesterday?
PDCA knocked off C&CCA with relative ease.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:27 pm
by Trader
Harry49 wrote:Did the ATCA v A&SCA game go ahead yesterday?
PDCA knocked off C&CCA with relative ease.


Scheduled for Jan 15th according to the SAMCA website.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:53 pm
by leftarmoffie
the milky bar kid wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Don't worry, we have all of those Church boys' names and phone numbers ....big recruiting drive for next season.


If they are playing on hard wicket, is it really cricket? :-k :lol:


Hard wicket cricketers do make handy Turf players as Senor would know

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:01 am
by Sonofbrowny25
question! if a bloke left on day 1 early and he is a bowler does he have to wait the next week that amount of time before he can bowl? we bowled 9 overs on day one without him there

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:13 am
by Lightning McQueen
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:question! if a bloke left on day 1 early and he is a bowler does he have to wait the next week that amount of time before he can bowl? we bowled 9 overs on day one without him there

Generally, yes if it exceeds 15 minutes.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:20 am
by Sonofbrowny25
Lightning McQueen wrote:
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:question! if a bloke left on day 1 early and he is a bowler does he have to wait the next week that amount of time before he can bowl? we bowled 9 overs on day one without him there

Generally, yes if it exceeds 15 minutes.


thought so...... doesnt help us one little bit hahah

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:29 am
by Trader
Lightning McQueen wrote:
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:question! if a bloke left on day 1 early and he is a bowler does he have to wait the next week that amount of time before he can bowl? we bowled 9 overs on day one without him there

Generally, yes if it exceeds 15 minutes.


I disagree. From the laws of cricket:

Law 2 (Substitutes and runners; batsman or fielder leaving the field; batsman retiring; batsman commencing innings)

Part 5. Fielder absent or leaving the field
If a fielder fails to take the field with his side at the start of the match or at any later time, or leaves the field during a session of play,

Section (c) if he is absent for 15 minutes of playing time or longer, he shall not be permitted to bowl thereafter, subject to (i), (ii) or (iii) below, until he has been on the field for at least the length of playing time for which he was absent.

Subsection (i) Absence or penalty for time absent shall not be carried over into a new day’s play.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:33 am
by human_torpedo
I always thought it was only that day it applies to. Im with Trader

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:35 am
by human_torpedo
But just for this week Sonofbrowny25 we will go with it does, so whoever left early cant bowl for that amount of time this week..

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:33 am
by Sonofbrowny25
Trader wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:question! if a bloke left on day 1 early and he is a bowler does he have to wait the next week that amount of time before he can bowl? we bowled 9 overs on day one without him there

Generally, yes if it exceeds 15 minutes.


I disagree. From the laws of cricket:

Law 2 (Substitutes and runners; batsman or fielder leaving the field; batsman retiring; batsman commencing innings)

Part 5. Fielder absent or leaving the field
If a fielder fails to take the field with his side at the start of the match or at any later time, or leaves the field during a session of play,

Section (c) if he is absent for 15 minutes of playing time or longer, he shall not be permitted to bowl thereafter, subject to (i), (ii) or (iii) below, until he has been on the field for at least the length of playing time for which he was absent.

Subsection (i) Absence or penalty for time absent shall not be carried over into a new day’s play.


thanks mate this clears it up! happy with the outcome.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:01 am
by Sonofbrowny25
human_torpedo wrote:But just for this week Sonofbrowny25 we will go with it does, so whoever left early cant bowl for that amount of time this week..


its a fifth change bowler anyway matw ;)

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:07 am
by human_torpedo
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:
human_torpedo wrote:But just for this week Sonofbrowny25 we will go with it does, so whoever left early cant bowl for that amount of time this week..


its a fifth change bowler anyway matw ;)

Luke Nelson is the only form bowler atm anyway. Unless its him its irrelevant

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:09 am
by Sonofbrowny25
human_torpedo wrote:
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:
human_torpedo wrote:But just for this week Sonofbrowny25 we will go with it does, so whoever left early cant bowl for that amount of time this week..


its a fifth change bowler anyway matw ;)

Luke Nelson is the only form bowler atm anyway. Unless its him its irrelevant


he is bowling quicker than i have ever seen this season!

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:13 am
by human_torpedo
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:
human_torpedo wrote:
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:
human_torpedo wrote:But just for this week Sonofbrowny25 we will go with it does, so whoever left early cant bowl for that amount of time this week..


its a fifth change bowler anyway matw ;)

Luke Nelson is the only form bowler atm anyway. Unless its him its irrelevant


he is bowling quicker than i have ever seen this season!

Came onto the bat nicely in our cheeky LO6 showdown the other week

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:19 am
by Sonofbrowny25
its a fifth change bowler anyway matw ;)[/quote]
Luke Nelson is the only form bowler atm anyway. Unless its him its irrelevant[/quote]

he is bowling quicker than i have ever seen this season![/quote]
Came onto the bat nicely in our cheeky LO6 showdown the other week[/quote]

yeah he said he couldn't take a wicket to save him on that day!
i thought your form bowler was scott.... we were wrong there.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:25 am
by human_torpedo
Only Scott will tell you he is our form bowler..

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:36 am
by Sonofbrowny25
human_torpedo wrote:Only Scott will tell you he is our form bowler..



that austin bloke bowls well! mitchy just does a job as usual.

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 1:12 pm
by Dogwatcher
human_torpedo wrote: Came onto the bat nicely in our cheeky LO6 showdown the other week


That was fun. ;)

Re: ATCA

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 9:01 pm
by Whatsfordinner
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all!! Hope everyone has been safe and well.

Anyone got any predictions for the remainder of the season? My thoughts:

A1 -
Minor Premiers - SPOC
Premiers - Grange
A1 Player of Year - Jack Dent
Relegated - Pembroke / Brighton

A2 -
Minor Premiers - ROCS
Premiers - Unley
A2 Player of Year - Lachlan Sandercock
Relegated - Modbury / Woodville Rech

A3 -
Minor Premiers - Pooraka
Premiers - Pooraka
A3 Player of Year - Mitchell Dearing
Relegated - PAOC / Golden Grove