by catchit » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:21 pm
by catchit » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:23 pm
by Rolls Royce » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:27 pm
by Well run » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:28 pm
catchit wrote:2nd to 5th are gonna be playing finals cricket before the finals, that will be a big advantage come march..
by Well run » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:35 pm
Rolls Royce wrote:Its classic watching you deflect attention from your mob Ben.
Look at the teams man for man on paper and tell me after the Salisbury West mass exodus 2 seasons back that Two Wells are not a far more talented side ? I love your approach to this situation though![]()
PS. You aren't still hurting from the semi against Westies a few years back are you ?![]()
PPS. Yes, I know the boys lost the week after.
by Rolls Royce » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:40 pm
masterplan man wrote:Rolls Royce wrote:Its classic watching you deflect attention from your mob Ben.
Look at the teams man for man on paper and tell me after the Salisbury West mass exodus 2 seasons back that Two Wells are not a far more talented side ? I love your approach to this situation though![]()
PS. You aren't still hurting from the semi against Westies a few years back are you ?![]()
PPS. Yes, I know the boys lost the week after.
PPPS - Im sure the answer from ben is going to be something along the lines of how sweet there victory was last season against Westies!!!!
PPPPS- I to like reading big ben's way of getting to people it certainly works!!!!!!!!!!!
by catchit » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:42 pm
Rolls Royce wrote:Its classic watching you deflect attention from your mob Ben.
Look at the teams man for man on paper and tell me after the Salisbury West mass exodus 2 seasons back that Two Wells are not a far more talented side ? I love your approach to this situation though![]()
PS. You aren't still hurting from the semi against Westies a few years back are you ?![]()
PPS. Yes, I know the boys lost the week after.
by catchit » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:50 pm
Rolls Royce wrote:masterplan man wrote:Rolls Royce wrote:Its classic watching you deflect attention from your mob Ben.
Look at the teams man for man on paper and tell me after the Salisbury West mass exodus 2 seasons back that Two Wells are not a far more talented side ? I love your approach to this situation though![]()
PS. You aren't still hurting from the semi against Westies a few years back are you ?![]()
PPS. Yes, I know the boys lost the week after.
PPPS - Im sure the answer from ben is going to be something along the lines of how sweet there victory was last season against Westies!!!!
PPPPS- I to like reading big ben's way of getting to people it certainly works!!!!!!!!!!!
No doubt that will be the response, and fair enough too. But thats my point. It was/is a Salisbury West side minus 5 blokes from the years they were favorites. Any other club losing the quality of those 5 would've been relegated. Go through Two Wells and Sandy's equivalents to the Salisbury West departures and you'll understand the taunting is unfair.
by Well run » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:57 pm
by Rolls Royce » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:59 pm
catchit wrote:Rolls Royce wrote:masterplan man wrote:Rolls Royce wrote:Its classic watching you deflect attention from your mob Ben.
Look at the teams man for man on paper and tell me after the Salisbury West mass exodus 2 seasons back that Two Wells are not a far more talented side ? I love your approach to this situation though![]()
PS. You aren't still hurting from the semi against Westies a few years back are you ?![]()
PPS. Yes, I know the boys lost the week after.
PPPS - Im sure the answer from ben is going to be something along the lines of how sweet there victory was last season against Westies!!!!
PPPPS- I to like reading big ben's way of getting to people it certainly works!!!!!!!!!!!
No doubt that will be the response, and fair enough too. But thats my point. It was/is a Salisbury West side minus 5 blokes from the years they were favorites. Any other club losing the quality of those 5 would've been relegated. Go through Two Wells and Sandy's equivalents to the Salisbury West departures and you'll understand the taunting is unfair.
come on rr i am not being unfair.. no matter who left you are still way out in front and thats full credit to the boys.. so you have to still be fav.. dont start making excuses incase they go down to the wells
by Rolls Royce » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:01 pm
masterplan man wrote:Ill have to say though RR.. Yes you had 5 blokes leave but TW and to a lesser degree Sandy have a lot less population to pick from!!!!!
Sals West have how many senior teams!!!!
by Well run » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:06 pm
by catchit » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:15 pm
Rolls Royce wrote:masterplan man wrote:Ill have to say though RR.. Yes you had 5 blokes leave but TW and to a lesser degree Sandy have a lot less population to pick from!!!!!
Sals West have how many senior teams!!!!
You are missing the point. It wasn't just any old 5.
Just because a club has 4 sides, does not make it 44 grade 1 players.
Like I said, take out the equivalents of the other two sides.
by Browny25 » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:25 pm
catchit wrote:its been a while since anyone has mentioned sals west being fav for the flag..
with miles to come in surely makes them $1.10 again
by Browny25 » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:29 pm
by cantbatcantbowl » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:30 pm
browny2323 wrote:catchit wrote:its been a while since anyone has mentioned sals west being fav for the flag..
with miles to come in surely makes them $1.10 again
I reckon more like $1.80
by cantbatcantbowl » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:32 pm
Rolls Royce wrote:masterplan man wrote:Ill have to say though RR.. Yes you had 5 blokes leave but TW and to a lesser degree Sandy have a lot less population to pick from!!!!!
Sals West have how many senior teams!!!!
You are missing the point. It wasn't just any old 5.
Just because a club has 4 sides, does not make it 44 grade 1 players.
Like I said, take out the equivalents of the other two sides.
by Browny25 » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:33 pm
cantbatcantbowl wrote:browny2323 wrote:catchit wrote:its been a while since anyone has mentioned sals west being fav for the flag..
with miles to come in surely makes them $1.10 again
I reckon more like $1.80
two wells $1.10
by catchit » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:35 pm
cantbatcantbowl wrote:browny2323 wrote:catchit wrote:its been a while since anyone has mentioned sals west being fav for the flag..
with miles to come in surely makes them $1.10 again
I reckon more like $1.80
two wells $1.10
by cantbatcantbowl » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:40 pm
catchit wrote:cantbatcantbowl wrote:browny2323 wrote:catchit wrote:its been a while since anyone has mentioned sals west being fav for the flag..
with miles to come in surely makes them $1.10 again
I reckon more like $1.80
two wells $1.10
cantbatcantbowl !!how can you respect that name:roll:
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |